BRAD EDWARDS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Courtney Wild
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Three young women
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AK
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witnesses who testified
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Several young women (victims)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Previous communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 1
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting where Kate asked the Government to look into sponsoring her for a U-Visa. Brad Edwards ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a lawsuit against the affiant, Brad Edwards, and Scott Rothstein alleging conspirac... | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Proffer session | Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal consultation | Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards to report the abuse she suffered. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial that the author indicates might not have happened without her attorneys. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Fundraisers and parties at witness's home | Witness's Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Start of Brad Edwards' investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Win/Settlement with Deutsche Bank | Legal Court/Settlement | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting and Contacts with Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards by AUSA [REDACTED]. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit brought by Epstein against Brad Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2025-10-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards called the FBI. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's second deposition. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition where he mentioned handwritten notes/journal. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards had access to 'the list'. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Discussion regarding trial order and witness testimony logistics. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Plea Hearing | SDNY Court | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | FBI received a USB drive containing photographs from Brad Edwards. | New York Office | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation dated by counsel | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Filing of Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule | New York, New York | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023001.jpg
An email sent by Darren Indyke on May 10, 2019, to Martin Weinberg and the address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The subject line indicates the email concerns a 'Privileged and Confidential' timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case published by the Miami Herald. The body of the email is heavily redacted, though the file attachments list names relevant to the case, including Virginia Roberts, Brad Edwards, and Barry Krischer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022996.jpg
This document is an email from attorney Brad Edwards to Miles and Kathy Alexander, former employees of Jeffrey Epstein on Little St. James. Edwards is soliciting their cooperation and testimony for a defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell on behalf of his client, Virginia Giuffre (whose name is mostly redacted but revealed at the end). The email emphasizes that the Alexanders are remembered fondly by the victim and urges them to simply tell the truth about the recruitment and events on the island to support the ongoing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011945.jpg
This article reports on court filings revealing links between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 modeling agency owner Jean Luc Brunel, alleging they brought underage girls into the country with promises of modeling contracts. The documents state that Epstein provided financial support to MC2 and used his New York condos to house models, while also attempting to block depositions of high-profile associates like Guislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015601.jpg
This document is a background section of a legal motion filed by attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards in a defamation case. It argues that the Defendant (contextually Alan Dershowitz) is abusing subpoena power to harass a non-party victim, Jane Doe No. 3 (Virginia Giuffre), following a defamation campaign where the Defendant called the attorneys 'unethical' on the Today Show. The motion seeks to quash the subpoena to protect Jane Doe No. 3 from further intimidation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015580.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 23, 2015, between Donna Paine, a freelance TV producer for ITN News, and attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards. Paine is requesting to be added to a media contact list in anticipation of a ruling by Judge Marra regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case and specific allegations made by Jane Doe #3 against Prince Andrew. Cassell confirms he will have his assistant, Joan, add Paine to their contacts list.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg
This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013439.jpg
A 2011 Daily Telegraph article (part of House Oversight records) details the sentencing of Epstein employee Rodriguez, who stole Epstein's 'black book' as an insurance policy against Epstein and Maxwell. The document quotes Rodriguez's lawyer stating Epstein's sentence might have been harsher had the book been found earlier, and mentions a defamation lawsuit Epstein filed against victim's lawyer Brad Edwards regarding a Ponzi scheme allegation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013432.jpg
A 2009 LexisNexis printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article detailing the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article highlights that Epstein avoided life in prison for federal sex trafficking charges in exchange for a light state sentence, and controversially secured immunity for co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. Attorneys for the victims express outrage at the deal and the exclusion of victims from the process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013426.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis printout of a Sun-Sentinel article from June 15, 2009, detailing a legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal with federal prosecutors. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Jeff Colbath acknowledged procedural failures in sealing the deal and set a hearing for June 25, while attorneys for Epstein's victims, Bill Berger and Brad Edwards, criticized the "sweetheart agreement" and special treatment Epstein received. The article notes Epstein was serving an 18-month sentence with work release privileges and that local police had forwarded information to the FBI due to dissatisfaction with the State Attorney's handling of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013421.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013416.jpg
A Palm Beach Post article from September 18, 2009, reporting on the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. The deal, criticized by legal experts and victims' attorneys as a "sweetheart deal," protected potential co-conspirators from charges and initially included a provision for Epstein to pay for a lawyer to negotiate civil settlements with victims. The article highlights the lack of consultation with victims and the disparity in sentencing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg
A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013337.jpg
This document page details the timeline and nature of multiple civil lawsuits filed against Jeffrey Epstein around 2008 by attorneys Brad Edwards and the firm Herman and Mermelstein. It describes complaints alleging sexual assault of minors filed in Florida and New York, including a specific suit by Ava Cordero.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013310.jpg
This document is a page from Brad Edwards' Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It lists questions Epstein refused to answer regarding sexual assaults on private planes and the procuring of minors (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe) for prostitution, arguing that the court should draw adverse inferences of guilt from his silence. The document also begins a legal argument stating that 'Litigation Privilege' does not protect Epstein from claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013307.jpg
This document is page 4 of Brad Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein's claims of wrongdoing against him are unsubstantiated and that Edwards had no involvement in the Scott Rothstein fraud. The text explicitly states Epstein is a 'serial molester of minors' (citing Virginia Roberts' statement) and references Epstein's guilty plea and agreement with the US Attorney's Office regarding payments to approximately 34 victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.jpg
This document is an email dated March 2, 2019, from Darren Indyke to Martin Weinberg (cc: jeevacation@gmail.com) containing a link to a Palm Beach Post article. The article, written by Jane Musgrave, reports that Jeffrey Epstein paid $5.5 million to three women to settle underage-sex lawsuits. The document includes captions referencing attorneys Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, and mentions Epstein's 2008 guilty plea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029608.jpg
This document is a page from The Virgin Islands Daily News dated February 22, 2019. The main article reports on a ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra, stating that federal prosecutors, including Alexander Acosta, violated federal law by concealing a plea agreement with Jeffrey Epstein from his underage victims in 2008. A sidebar article details USVI Governor Albert Bryan Jr.'s trip to Washington D.C. to meet with Trump administration officials.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). A witness is testifying about an event around July 2010 involving a client represented by themselves and Brad Edwards. The testimony is interrupted by a phone line, leading to the identification of Ken Sweder, Alan Dershowitz, and Darrin Indyke as listeners on the call.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021860.jpg
This document is page 37 of a rough draft deposition transcript stamped by House Oversight. The witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding which attorneys they held a 'common interest privilege' with as of December 30, 2014. The witness identifies Brad Edwards, attorneys from Boies Schiller (representing Virginia Roberts), and Mr. Scarola (representing Brad Edwards).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021716.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article from August 2011 detailing legal arguments before Judge Kenneth Marra regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two Jane Does, argued that the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with victims before signing the deal. The attorneys sought to nullify the agreement and unseal correspondence, aiming to expose Epstein to federal prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021709.jpg
This document is a printout of a Daily Mail article dated March 16, 2011, recounting Virginia's (Giuffre) experiences with Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Epstein sent her to Thailand for massage school in 2002, where she met and married her husband, Robert. The text outlines the subsequent FBI investigation, the discovery of hidden cameras at Epstein's Palm Beach home, and lawyer Brad Edwards' criticism of Epstein's lenient plea deal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021671.jpg
This Daily Beast article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, highlighting the tension between local police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney (Barry Krischer). It discusses the involvement of Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 agency in recruiting girls, the aggressive tactics of Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) against police and victims, and the eventual non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges despite a draft indictment threatening 20 years in prison.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021551.jpg
A printout of a New York Post 'Page Six' article from July 21, 2008. The article reports that three women suing Jeffrey Epstein are asking US District Judge Kenneth Marra to void Epstein's plea deal with the State of Florida, arguing they were not consulted on the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein's representative, Howard Rubenstein, is quoted denying the allegations and claiming the women were not victims.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Firm/Ponzi Scheme | BRAD EDWARDS | $0.00 | Potential bonuses discussed regarding work on c... | View |
Response to Proposed Facts
Response to proposed facts and request for NPA and interview report.
Proposed Undisputed Facts
Government's proposed set of stipulated facts.
Notification of Identified Victim (C.W.)
Notifying attorney that client C.W. is an identified victim under the non-prosecution agreement terms.
Victim Notification
Referenced letter regarding notification to Jane Doe #1.
Notification of Identified Victim (S.R.)
Notifying attorney that client S.R. is an identified victim under the non-prosecution agreement terms.
Notification of Identified Victim
Informing counsel that client is identified as a victim for NPA purposes
Service of Petition
Service of the Victim's Petition via US Mail and Facsimile.
Federal Prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Urges federal indictment of Epstein, citing abuse of >100 girls and inadequacy of state plea.
Urging Prosecution
Urged vigorous enforcement of federal laws against Epstein.
Request for Prosecution
Urging vigorous enforcement of federal laws and indictment of Epstein.
Plea Hearing Notification
Notifying counsel that the state plea hearing was scheduled for Monday, June 30, 2008.
Jeff Epstein
Edwards requests a meeting to share information and concerns. States he will be in the area meeting a client next week.
Representation of Jane Doe #1 and #2
Edwards informed AUSA of representation and asked to provide info for federal charges; was not told of existing NPA.
Representation
Edwards informed AUSA he represented victims; discussed potential federal charges; AUSA did not disclose NPA.
Representation
Called to hire him to get prosecutors to hear the truth.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity