BRAD EDWARDS

Person
Mentions
349
Relationships
88
Events
67
Documents
174

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
88 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
10
View
person Jane Doe
Client
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Kate
Client
8 Strong
3
View
person Virginia Giuffre
Client
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Courtney Wild
Client
6
2
View
person the witness
Business associate
6
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Adversarial
6
2
View
person Three young women
Client
5
1
View
person AK
Professional
5
1
View
person witness
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Witnesses who testified
Client
5
1
View
person victims
Professional
5
1
View
person Jack Scarola
Client
5
1
View
person SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
Professional
5
1
View
person Several young women (victims)
Client
5
1
View
person Virginia Roberts
Previous communication
5
1
View
person JANE DOE NO. 1
Client
5
1
View
person Jack Scarola
Business associate
5
1
View
person E.W.
Client
5
1
View
person MR. SCAROLA
Client
5
1
View
person witness
Acquaintance
5
1
View
person Questioner (Q)
Client
5
1
View
person Kate
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Meeting A meeting where Kate asked the Government to look into sponsoring her for a U-Visa. Brad Edwards ... N/A View
N/A N/A Epstein filed a lawsuit against the affiant, Brad Edwards, and Scott Rothstein alleging conspirac... Court (implied) View
N/A Proffer session Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate. N/A View
N/A Legal consultation Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards to report the abuse she suffered. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A trial that the author indicates might not have happened without her attorneys. N/A View
N/A N/A New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. West Palm Beach, Fla. View
N/A N/A Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. Court View
N/A N/A Fundraisers and parties at witness's home Witness's Home View
N/A N/A Start of Brad Edwards' investigation. N/A View
N/A N/A Win/Settlement with Deutsche Bank Legal Court/Settlement View
N/A N/A Meeting and Contacts with Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards by AUSA [REDACTED]. N/A View
N/A N/A Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). Broward County Circuit Court View
N/A N/A Lawsuit brought by Epstein against Brad Edwards. Florida View
2025-10-01 N/A Brad Edwards called the FBI. N/A View
2025-08-01 N/A Alfredo Rodriguez's second deposition. N/A View
2025-07-01 N/A Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition. N/A View
2025-07-01 N/A Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition where he mentioned handwritten notes/journal. N/A View
2025-07-01 N/A Brad Edwards had access to 'the list'. N/A View
2021-12-09 Legal proceeding appearances Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... N/A View
2021-11-20 N/A Discussion regarding trial order and witness testimony logistics. N/A View
2021-04-23 N/A Plea Hearing SDNY Court View
2020-07-17 N/A FBI received a USB drive containing photographs from Brad Edwards. New York Office View
2020-06-12 N/A Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action New York, New York View
2020-06-12 N/A Joint Stipulation dated by counsel New York, New York View
2020-02-06 N/A Filing of Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule New York, New York View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023001.jpg

An email sent by Darren Indyke on May 10, 2019, to Martin Weinberg and the address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The subject line indicates the email concerns a 'Privileged and Confidential' timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case published by the Miami Herald. The body of the email is heavily redacted, though the file attachments list names relevant to the case, including Virginia Roberts, Brad Edwards, and Barry Krischer.

Email
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022996.jpg

This document is an email from attorney Brad Edwards to Miles and Kathy Alexander, former employees of Jeffrey Epstein on Little St. James. Edwards is soliciting their cooperation and testimony for a defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell on behalf of his client, Virginia Giuffre (whose name is mostly redacted but revealed at the end). The email emphasizes that the Alexanders are remembered fondly by the victim and urges them to simply tell the truth about the recruitment and events on the island to support the ongoing litigation.

Email correspondence / legal inquiry
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011945.jpg

This article reports on court filings revealing links between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 modeling agency owner Jean Luc Brunel, alleging they brought underage girls into the country with promises of modeling contracts. The documents state that Epstein provided financial support to MC2 and used his New York condos to house models, while also attempting to block depositions of high-profile associates like Guislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton.

News article / legal filing report
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015601.jpg

This document is a background section of a legal motion filed by attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards in a defamation case. It argues that the Defendant (contextually Alan Dershowitz) is abusing subpoena power to harass a non-party victim, Jane Doe No. 3 (Virginia Giuffre), following a defamation campaign where the Defendant called the attorneys 'unethical' on the Today Show. The motion seeks to quash the subpoena to protect Jane Doe No. 3 from further intimidation.

Legal filing (motion background/argument)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015580.jpg

This document is an email thread from January 23, 2015, between Donna Paine, a freelance TV producer for ITN News, and attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards. Paine is requesting to be added to a media contact list in anticipation of a ruling by Judge Marra regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case and specific allegations made by Jane Doe #3 against Prince Andrew. Cassell confirms he will have his assistant, Joan, add Paine to their contacts list.

Email thread
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013464.jpg

This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.

Legal affidavit/declaration (page from a court filing)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013439.jpg

A 2011 Daily Telegraph article (part of House Oversight records) details the sentencing of Epstein employee Rodriguez, who stole Epstein's 'black book' as an insurance policy against Epstein and Maxwell. The document quotes Rodriguez's lawyer stating Epstein's sentence might have been harsher had the book been found earlier, and mentions a defamation lawsuit Epstein filed against victim's lawyer Brad Edwards regarding a Ponzi scheme allegation.

News article / house oversight committee exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013432.jpg

A 2009 LexisNexis printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article detailing the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article highlights that Epstein avoided life in prison for federal sex trafficking charges in exchange for a light state sentence, and controversially secured immunity for co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. Attorneys for the victims express outrage at the deal and the exclusion of victims from the process.

News article / lexisnexis database record
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013426.jpg

This document is a LexisNexis printout of a Sun-Sentinel article from June 15, 2009, detailing a legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal with federal prosecutors. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Jeff Colbath acknowledged procedural failures in sealing the deal and set a hearing for June 25, while attorneys for Epstein's victims, Bill Berger and Brad Edwards, criticized the "sweetheart agreement" and special treatment Epstein received. The article notes Epstein was serving an 18-month sentence with work release privileges and that local police had forwarded information to the FBI due to dissatisfaction with the State Attorney's handling of the case.

News article (lexisnexis database record)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013421.jpg

This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.

News article / database printout (lexisnexis)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013416.jpg

A Palm Beach Post article from September 18, 2009, reporting on the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. The deal, criticized by legal experts and victims' attorneys as a "sweetheart deal," protected potential co-conspirators from charges and initially included a provision for Epstein to pay for a lawyer to negotiate civil settlements with victims. The article highlights the lack of consultation with victims and the disparity in sentencing.

Webpage printout / news article
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg

A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.

News article (web archive printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg

This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.

Webpage printout / news article
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013337.jpg

This document page details the timeline and nature of multiple civil lawsuits filed against Jeffrey Epstein around 2008 by attorneys Brad Edwards and the firm Herman and Mermelstein. It describes complaints alleging sexual assault of minors filed in Florida and New York, including a specific suit by Ava Cordero.

Legal document / court filing (page 19)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013310.jpg

This document is a page from Brad Edwards' Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It lists questions Epstein refused to answer regarding sexual assaults on private planes and the procuring of minors (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe) for prostitution, arguing that the court should draw adverse inferences of guilt from his silence. The document also begins a legal argument stating that 'Litigation Privilege' does not protect Epstein from claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution.

Legal filing (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013307.jpg

This document is page 4 of Brad Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein's claims of wrongdoing against him are unsubstantiated and that Edwards had no involvement in the Scott Rothstein fraud. The text explicitly states Epstein is a 'serial molester of minors' (citing Virginia Roberts' statement) and references Epstein's guilty plea and agreement with the US Attorney's Office regarding payments to approximately 34 victims.

Legal pleading / court filing (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.jpg

This document is an email dated March 2, 2019, from Darren Indyke to Martin Weinberg (cc: jeevacation@gmail.com) containing a link to a Palm Beach Post article. The article, written by Jane Musgrave, reports that Jeffrey Epstein paid $5.5 million to three women to settle underage-sex lawsuits. The document includes captions referencing attorneys Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, and mentions Epstein's 2008 guilty plea.

Email
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029608.jpg

This document is a page from The Virgin Islands Daily News dated February 22, 2019. The main article reports on a ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra, stating that federal prosecutors, including Alexander Acosta, violated federal law by concealing a plea agreement with Jeffrey Epstein from his underage victims in 2008. A sidebar article details USVI Governor Albert Bryan Jr.'s trip to Washington D.C. to meet with Trump administration officials.

Newspaper article / clipping
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg

This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). A witness is testifying about an event around July 2010 involving a client represented by themselves and Brad Edwards. The testimony is interrupted by a phone line, leading to the identification of Ken Sweder, Alan Dershowitz, and Darrin Indyke as listeners on the call.

Legal transcript (deposition/hearing)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021860.jpg

This document is page 37 of a rough draft deposition transcript stamped by House Oversight. The witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding which attorneys they held a 'common interest privilege' with as of December 30, 2014. The witness identifies Brad Edwards, attorneys from Boies Schiller (representing Virginia Roberts), and Mr. Scarola (representing Brad Edwards).

Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021716.jpg

This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article from August 2011 detailing legal arguments before Judge Kenneth Marra regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two Jane Does, argued that the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with victims before signing the deal. The attorneys sought to nullify the agreement and unseal correspondence, aiming to expose Epstein to federal prosecution.

News article printout / legal evidence
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021709.jpg

This document is a printout of a Daily Mail article dated March 16, 2011, recounting Virginia's (Giuffre) experiences with Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Epstein sent her to Thailand for massage school in 2002, where she met and married her husband, Robert. The text outlines the subsequent FBI investigation, the discovery of hidden cameras at Epstein's Palm Beach home, and lawyer Brad Edwards' criticism of Epstein's lenient plea deal.

News article / web printout
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021671.jpg

This Daily Beast article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, highlighting the tension between local police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney (Barry Krischer). It discusses the involvement of Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 agency in recruiting girls, the aggressive tactics of Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) against police and victims, and the eventual non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges despite a draft indictment threatening 20 years in prison.

News article (the daily beast printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021551.jpg

A printout of a New York Post 'Page Six' article from July 21, 2008. The article reports that three women suing Jeffrey Epstein are asking US District Judge Kenneth Marra to void Epstein's plea deal with the State of Florida, arguing they were not consulted on the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein's representative, Howard Rubenstein, is quoted denying the allegations and claiming the women were not victims.

News article printout (web page)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Firm/Ponzi Scheme BRAD EDWARDS $0.00 Potential bonuses discussed regarding work on c... View
As Sender
26
As Recipient
14
Total
40

Cases

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: local and regional inv...

Edwards denies participating in any communications with investors or 'pumping' cases.

General communications
N/A

U-Visa Application

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: ["government"]

Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate during a proffer session.

Proffer session
N/A

U-Visa Application

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: ["government"]

Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate during a proffer session.

Proffer session
N/A

Information regarding abuse/Dershowitz

From: Doe
To: BRAD EDWARDS

Jane Doe No. 3 provided information related to the subject of abuse by Dershowitz.

Telephone calls
N/A

Epstein case status

From: the witness
To: BRAD EDWARDS

"Hey, Brad how are you? How is the Epstein stuff going?"

Conversation
N/A

TV Interviews

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: People in the area

Urging people to watch Virginia Roberts' interview scheduled on three TV programs.

Communication
N/A

Congratulations

From: Redacted Sender
To: BRAD EDWARDS

Congratulating Brad on the Deutsche Bank win and asking about the settlement figure and the JP Morgan lawsuit.

Email
N/A

Reporting abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Kate
To: BRAD EDWARDS

Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards when her daughter was 1 or 2 to tell him the full extent of the manipulation and abuse instigated by Ghislaine Maxwell.

Conversation
N/A

[EXTERNAL] Trial

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: USANYS Recipient (Reda...

Discussing an Order, next steps, and potential travel/scope of testimony for a witness.

Email
2021-11-20

doc 001 Doe vs Epstein estate complaint.pdf

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: [REDACTED]

Original email sending a PDF attachment of a legal complaint.

Email
2020-03-23

Re: [Redacted]

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: BRAD EDWARDS

Following up on document request; specifically asking for photographs of the witness.

Email
2019-09-30

RE: [Redacted]

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: [Redacted] (AUSA)

We will send you all of the emails we have.

Email
2019-09-23

N/A (Body of email shown)

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: Miles Alexander and Ka...

Legal outreach requesting cooperation and truthful testimony regarding events on Little St. James and recruitment by Ghislaine Maxwell.

Email
2016-05-17

Questioning regarding Jane and dates

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: Alessi

Alessi was questioned by Brad Edwards in Fort Lauderdale.

Testimony/deposition
2016-01-01

Resolution of matter regarding a tape

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: Anne B. Carroll

Edwards explained the legal necessity of the tape for the Jane Doe case; Carroll warned that Mr. Rush's disclosure was a 'stupid move' putting his job at risk.

Meeting
2010-04-23

Voicemail

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: [REDACTED] assistant

Voicemail left in the morning, likely regarding the Rothstein firm complaint.

Call
2009-12-09

Deposition of Larry Visoski

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: LARRY VISOSKI

Questioning regarding Visoski's knowledge of Epstein's activities and belief in allegations.

Deposition
2009-10-15

Deposition of Larry Eugene Morrison

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: Larry Eugene Morrison

Questioning regarding Morrison's knowledge of Epstein's activities and willingness to leave his daughter with Epstein.

Deposition
2009-10-06

Reporting evidence related to Epstein

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: FBI

Brad Edwards allegedly called the FBI to report evidence, including the 'Epstein list'.

Call
2009-10-01

Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: All counsel on attache...

Service of notice via U.S. Mail and email transmission (exact date in August illegible, likely mid-August)

Mail/email
2009-08-01

Draft Protective Order

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: BRAD EDWARDS

Sending draft protective order regarding disclosure of non-prosecution agreement to Edwards and Jane Does 1 and 2.

Email
2008-08-15

RE: Draft Protective Order

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Discussing the proposed protective order, specifically objecting to paragraph C regarding client acknowledgement requirements.

Email
2008-08-15

Stipulation of facts regarding Epstein case

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: AUSA [Redacted]

Edwards proposes adding facts about the secret NPA to the court notice and demands a copy of the agreement.

Letter
2008-08-01

Change of course regarding undisputed facts

From: AUSA [Redacted]
To: BRAD EDWARDS

Referenced in the opening paragraph.

Letter
2008-07-25

Response to Proposed Facts

From: BRAD EDWARDS
To: Government officials

Response to proposed facts and request for NPA and interview report.

Letter
2008-07-17

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity