State Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Jurisdictional coordination conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Jurisdictional coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
1 CLEARLAKE CENTRE LLC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States attorney
|
Jurisdictional separation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO (Federal Prosecutors)
|
Conflict jurisdictional dispute |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PALM BEACH POLICE
|
Professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated stopped communicating |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Obligated to discuss with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigated involved in case of |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to actions |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAFLS
|
Professional jurisdictional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of prosecution by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Federal Prosecutor (Sender)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
PBPD
|
Adversarial distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement consultation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
federal prosecutors
|
Professional strained |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001-05-01 | N/A | Palm Beach PD asked the state attorney's office to issue an arrest warrant for Jeffrey Epstein | Palm Beach, FL | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021791.jpg
This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 2006 discussing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details Reiter's push for more serious charges against Epstein, the subsequent plea deal controversy, and personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Reiter, including references to his divorce. The text criticizes the justice system's preferential treatment of wealthy defendants like Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021785.jpg
This document is a 2006 New York Times article (stamped by House Oversight) detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The police sought arrest warrants based on interviews with victims like Ms. Robson, but the State Attorney delayed, opting for a grand jury after Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) presented evidence attacking the accusers' credibility. Police Chief Reiter formally questioned the State Attorney's handling of the case, suggesting he disqualify himself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021782.jpg
This document, stamped by House Oversight, profiles Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter amidst the Epstein investigation. It details the conflict between Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, with Reiter urging Krischer's disqualification and eventually referring the Epstein case to the FBI. The text also defends Reiter's professional reputation against attacks from the 'Epstein camp,' citing support from fellow police chiefs and his history of handling high-profile cases involving the Kennedy family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021779.jpg
This document appears to be a House Oversight Committee record containing text from an editorial criticizing the handling of the Epstein case by State Attorney Barry Krischer, followed by a New York Post article from July 27, 2006. The text details how the plea deal allowed Epstein to avoid federal investigation and serious prison time despite police evidence (phone messages, school transcripts) proving he knew the victims were underage. It highlights the discrepancy between the police investigation's findings and the grand jury's decision to only charge him with soliciting a prostitute, noting he was released on $3,000 bail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021776.jpg
This document contains the text of a Palm Beach Post editorial and column from August 10, 2006, discussing the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details allegations of witness intimidation by private investigators, a proposed plea deal for probation, and includes quotes from the State Attorney's spokesman admitting that wealth can buy a different standard of justice. The text also summarizes the police findings of unlawful sex acts with five underage girls and the defense attorney's claim that Epstein did not know they were minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021770.jpg
This document contains an excerpt from a Palm Beach Post article dated August 14, 2006, discussing the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and the conflict between his defense team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It details allegations against Epstein involving minors, his lawyers' attempts to discredit Reiter by calling him a "nutcase" and bringing up his divorce, and Reiter's criticism of State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021765.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or column critiquing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case (circa 2006). It contrasts the overwhelming evidence collected by police—including phone messages, school transcripts, and witness testimony—against the prosecutors' reluctance to charge Epstein due to perceived victim credibility issues. The text highlights a controversial quote from a State Attorney spokesman admitting that wealth can indeed buy a different standard of justice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021762.jpg
This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 14, 2006, detailing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights Reiter's push for harsher charges (sexual activity with minors) versus the State Attorney's lighter plea deal, and documents the personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Chief Reiter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021670.jpg
This document is a printout of a 2010 Daily Beast article discussing the leniency Jeffrey Epstein received despite serious charges. It details former Police Chief Michael Reiter's deposition, which alleges interference by the State Attorney and DOJ, and outlines the recruitment of underage girls in Palm Beach coordinated by Epstein and his staff, specifically Haley Robson and Alfredo Rodriguez. The text lists high-profile associates who flew on Epstein's jets and his legal team, while noting the investigation identified dozens of victims across multiple international properties.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021524.jpg
This newspaper clipping details the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on civil lawsuits filed by two 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs. It highlights a family conflict where the mother of the first Jane Doe is trying to halt the lawsuit filed by the father, citing the daughter's estrangement from him. The article also mentions Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew), the defense strategy led by Alan Dershowitz involving Myspace evidence, and attorney Herman's press conference at the bridge used to transport recruited girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021453.jpg
A March 2007 FBI clipping from the West Palm Beach Post discusses the unusual lack of progress in the Jeffrey Epstein solicitation case. Legal experts and police speculate that the delays suggest a pending plea deal or an ongoing federal probe, with the FBI confirming they still have a 'pending case.' The article highlights the conflict between Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, and notes Epstein's connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012138.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The letter argues that a new Grand Jury subpoena violates Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and asserts that the investigation in New York lacks the federal elements (internet luring, coercion, etc.) necessary for prosecution. The defense claims that three principal accusers (names redacted) have given sworn statements that contradict the prosecution's case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030256.jpg
This document contains an email from Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'J' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to 'Ken' dated December 13, 2018. The email body includes a lengthy draft article or statement intended for a law journal that attempts to whitewash Epstein's past crimes as a 'non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement.' The text aggressively defends the original state plea deal, criticizes federal prosecutors for overreach, and characterizes Epstein as a philanthropist who has paid his debt to society.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016440.jpg
This document, part of House Oversight records, details the friction between investigators (Recarey and Reiter) and the Palm Beach County State Attorney's office (Krischer and Belohlavek) during the Epstein investigation. It highlights defense attorney Alan Dershowitz's attempts to discredit a victim using her MySpace page and marijuana use, and Investigator Recarey's strong rebuttal against such victim-blaming. The text also notes that the prosecutors actively avoided communication with the investigators and delayed the approval of subpoenas.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016437.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news article (likely the Miami Herald) featuring a photograph of lead detective Joe Recarey. It details the timeline of the 2005 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, noting that detectives identified between 21 and 35 underage victims before the arrest. Crucially, it alleges that then-State Attorney Barry Krischer pressured detectives Reiter and Recarey to downgrade or drop the charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.jpg
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030316.jpg
This document is an email from 'J' to 'ken' dated December 13, 2018, containing a draft article for a law journal. The article is a robust defense of Jeffrey Epstein, arguing he has paid his debt to society for past 'misdeeds' and should be allowed to move on. It criticizes the federal prosecution's 'overreach' in his case and portrays Epstein positively as a philanthropist and a 'trusted friend' of his legal team.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030312.jpg
This August 14, 2006, article from the Palm Beach Post details the conflict surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the criticism Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter leveled against State Attorney Barry Krischer for his lenient handling of the case, and the subsequent personal attacks on Reiter's character by Epstein's high-powered legal team. The article contrasts the police's push for serious charges with the eventual plea deal, which dropped a federal investigation and allowed Epstein to avoid significant prison time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030309.jpg
This document is a New York Times article from July 1, 2008, detailing Jeffrey Epstein beginning his 18-month sentence for soliciting prostitution in Palm Beach County, Florida. The article includes quotes from Epstein ('I respect the legal process') and his legal representative, Mr. Lefcourt, who criticizes the public release of information. An email disclaimer for 'jeevacation@gmail.com' is appended to the article, and the entire document is labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030309'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030308.jpg
This document summarizes the 2005 police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, detailing allegations from a 14-year-old girl and others who were recruited by an associate, Haley Robson. It highlights conflicts between the Palm Beach police, who sought to arrest Epstein, and the state attorney's office, led by Mr. Krischer, which delayed proceedings. The defense, including lawyers Lefcourt and Dershowitz, actively worked to discredit the accusers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030307.jpg
This New York Times article from September 3, 2006, details the sex crimes investigation into money manager Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, Florida. It outlines allegations from teenage girls, the police investigation, and the controversial decision by the state attorney to pursue a lesser charge of soliciting prostitution. The article highlights accusations of preferential treatment for the wealthy and connected Epstein, noting criticism from the police chief and the reputational fallout, including politicians returning his campaign donations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030305.jpg
This document consists of clippings from the Palm Beach Post, primarily from August 14, 2006, detailing the legal troubles of financier Jeffrey Epstein. It covers allegations of sexual assault against minors, a potential federal plea deal, Epstein's indictment on state charges, and the conflict between Epstein's legal team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, whom they accuse of a personal vendetta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030300.jpg
This document critiques the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in Palm Beach, questioning why prosecutors, led by State Attorney Barry Krischer, did not pursue more serious charges despite evidence that Epstein knew his victims were teenagers. It details efforts by Epstein's legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, to discredit the victims and highlights a lenient plea deal offered by the state. The text also notes allegations of witness intimidation and includes a quote from Epstein's lawyer admitting girls were at the house.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012270.jpg
This document is page 15 of a deposition transcript where an individual is questioned about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The interviewee denies ever contacting law enforcement and states that neither Epstein nor his associates contacted them after a 'massage,' with the exception of their best friend (whose name is redacted). The interviewee clarifies that their friend's inquiry about 'going back' was a personal conversation and not an official request on behalf of Mr. Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018923.jpg
This document is an FBI form containing an August 4, 2006, editorial from The Palm Beach Post by Elisa Cramer, which is highly critical of the state attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Cramer argues that Epstein, 53, should have faced charges for sex with minors (ages 14-17) rather than a single solicitation charge, questioning the decision to offer a plea deal and not proceed to a jury trial. The article highlights evidence that Epstein knew the girls' ages, his defense team's tactics to discredit victims, and raises concerns about a two-tiered justice system for the wealthy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity