| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
This document contains an email chain from May 2021 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and defense counsel regarding the scheduling of the trial for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails confirm that jury selection was scheduled for the week of November 15, 2021, with the trial set to begin on November 29, 2021. The correspondence includes discussions about checking for scheduling conflicts prior to submitting a proposal to the Court.
This document is an internal email dated November 20, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to their legal team. The email concerns a 'Jury instructions letter' and includes an attachment titled '2021-11-20,_GM,_edits_to_limiting_instructions_v3.docx', likely related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). The sender asks for comments on the attached draft.
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between defense attorney Christian Everdell and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY. They are negotiating the specific wording of a legal stipulation regarding a partial transcript of a witness's trial testimony given on a February 26th. The names of several other attorneys (Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca) appear in the CC line.
This document is an email dated May 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the case 'US v. Maxwell'. The email shares a draft joint letter seeking an extension for a pretrial schedule deadline, following a discussion held the previous day.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between attorney Daniel Rose and an Assistant US Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The discussion concerns the safety and wellness of a crime victim (Ms. [Redacted]) represented by Rose. Rose reports escalating harassment from the media and notes a specific incident where an unknown individual sent a video of Jeffrey Epstein to the victim's YouTube account.
An email dated July 24, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a 'protective order' for discovery. The email references an attachment with the filename containing 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'RMB' (likely Judge Richard M. Berman), indicating legal proceedings related to the Epstein case.
This document is an email dated July 18, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a contractor. The attorney requests that subpoena returns related to the Epstein investigation (specifically from American Express and Deutsche Bank) be burned to a disc. The disc is intended for a Special Agent and Detective, to be handed off to 'Mandy' (likely FBI Agent Amanda Young) and 'Paul' at a conference.
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between SDNY and FBI officials regarding the Epstein investigation. An Assistant U.S. Attorney instructs a contractor named Hamilton to burn subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank onto discs for a Special Agent and Detective. The chain also discusses the addition of a forensic accountant to the investigative squad and plans for a strategy meeting.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between a contractor named Hamilton and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the preparation of evidence discs containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank related to the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' investigation. The discs were to be delivered to a Special Agent and a Detective, potentially for hand-off at a conference.
This document is an email thread from July 17, 2019, regarding the legal case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. Attorney Martin Weinberg asks an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York if an original document can be viewed the following day. The discussion centers on an attachment titled 'Passport Photographs.pdf', with the prosecutor noting that pages 6 and 7 of the passport were blank and therefore not photographed.
An email dated July 16, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Berman. The email serves to provide courtesy copies of the Government's supplemental submission regarding Jeffrey Epstein's detention, including redacted public filings and unredacted versions requested to be filed under seal.
This document is an email chain between defense attorney Michael Bachner and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's female client. Bachner formally notifies the prosecution that his client intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, while the prosecution pushes back against a 'blanket' invocation. The emails also reference the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) being sent as an attachment.
This document is an email dated October 7, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'Emails' and it contains four attachments that appear to be FBI native PDF files (FBI_0000018415_native.pdf, etc.). The names of the sender and recipient are redacted.
This document is an email dated October 7, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email transmits an attached PDF titled '2020.07.15,_GM,_20_Cr._330_(AJN),_Scheduling_Order.pdf', which references case number 20 Cr. 330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) and Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN).
An email dated July 31, 2019, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Marc Fernich, Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and Michael Miller regarding case 19 Cr. 490 (Epstein). The email notifies counsel that the first discovery production has been loaded onto a drive and is ready for pickup at the Government's office, specifically in an envelope marked for Michael Miller.
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Michael Bachner, a lawyer, and an Assistant United States Attorney, along with other redacted individuals, concerning the scheduling of meetings and a 'reverse proffer' related to the Epstein investigation between July 11-15, 2019. The emails discuss various proposed meeting times at different locations in New York, including Bachner's office and the US Attorney's office, with some scheduling conflicts arising from a client's arraignment on a RICO charge in Queens County.
This document contains a chain of emails from July 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Marc Fernich, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence primarily concerns the coordination of returning personal items (cash, effects) seized from Epstein during his arrest, while the government explicitly states they are retaining his electronic devices pursuant to a search warrant. The emails also reference the submission of a government bail memorandum to Judges Pitman and Berman.
Email chain between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) U.S. Attorney's office and defense counsel (likely Hafetz & Necheles) regarding a grand jury subpoena issued to an associate of Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. The SDNY is explicitly requesting flight manifests, flight plans, and travel records dating back to 2000, as well as information regarding observations of young women or girls on flights and the identities of Epstein's staff. The emails discuss scheduling a call and potentially holding the subpoena return date in abeyance in exchange for a voluntary interview or attorney proffer.
An email dated August 1, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email confirms a request for records regarding flights on Jeffrey Epstein's jets, specifically log books, and inquires about the hiring history of a redacted individual who worked for Epstein in 2005 and 2015. The email serves as a precursor to a formal subpoena.
This document is an internal email chain from July 17, 2019, within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). A Deputy United States Attorney requests a copy of the 'Filed version of Epstein papers' from a colleague. The colleague replies with three PDF attachments (including a Defense Letter dated July 16, 2019) and notes that these are the publicly filed versions, offering the unredacted submission if needed.
This document is an internal email chain from July 16, 2019, between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. The emails discuss a legal filing and quote a specific defense argument explaining Jeffrey Epstein's possession of an expired Austrian passport. The defense claims Epstein acquired the passport in the 1980s for personal protection against hijackers while traveling in the Middle East as an affluent Jewish man.
This document is an email thread from July 16, 2019, involving Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns a detention submission for Jeffrey Epstein (referenced as 'JE' in the attachment). A key point in the thread is that an AUSA contacted Judge Berman's chambers and was informed that the Judge did not want to see photographs, leading the prosecution to decide not to bring them.
This document is an email from June 25, 2019, circulated within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email shares the text of an Associated Press article by Curt Anderson titled 'US: Once-secret Jeffrey Epstein sex offender deal must stand.' The article details federal prosecutors' stance that Epstein's 2008 plea deal cannot be voided despite violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
This document contains an email thread between Roberta Kaplan's law firm (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence, dated January and February 2020, concerns a 'Touhy letter' request for documents from the Department of Justice related to pending litigation (*Doe v. Indyke et al.*) against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The emails discuss scheduling a time to talk and reviewing the attached letters.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity