Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Sternheim

Person
Mentions
877
Relationships
86
Events
390
Documents
429
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
86 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
25
View
person Mr. Everdell
Co counsel
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
11
View
person Kate
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
14
View
person Judge
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
116
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Loftus
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Gill Velez
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Co counsel
7
3
View
person Ms. Conrad
Professional
7
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-08-22 N/A Sentencing Hearing for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-22 N/A Court filing date of the transcript document. Southern District of New York View
2022-08-10 N/A Courtroom discussion regarding logistics of presenting evidence on screens. Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of court document 761 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Discussion of Exhibits 823 and 824 Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Trial Resumed Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Discussion on Deliberation Schedule Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing date of the court transcript document. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court Recess Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion regarding witne... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding opening statements and admissibility of arguments about witness coaching. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Conclusion of testimony for witness 'Kate'. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court filing date for the transcript document. Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination of Professor Loftus in court regarding memory stages. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court filing of transcript Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of Document 741 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding regarding jury selection procedure (alternating strikes). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Closing Arguments (Summation Phase) Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings (Direct examination of Parkinson) Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings without the jury present. Discussion regarding the provision of transcripts to ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding regarding jury charges and closing arguments. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion of evidence... Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
55
As Recipient
5
Total
60

Scheduling break

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Let's get started. My plan was to break at 3:30.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Documents 823 and 824

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding a personal action notice for Sky Roberts and insurance documents listing his dependents.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pending redaction issues

From: Ms. Moe
To: Ms. Sternheim

Spoke regarding pending redaction issues.

Conversation
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Confusion

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument that the jury mentioning New Mexico for a New York count indicates confusion not solved by simple referral.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Requesting to wait until tomorrow.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural discussion regarding demonstrative evidence

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard due to COVID restrictions and whether a photograph of the work should be preserved for the record.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect examination

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Professor Loftus

Asking if testimony would differ if called by the government.

Courtroom testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Insurance Records

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding whether insurance forms constitute business records and what inferences can be drawn regarding Virginia Roberts.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Basis for introducing evidence

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Ms. Sternheim refers to "The papers that we filed last night" which state the basis for seeking to introduce certain evidence.

Legal filing
2022-08-09
Communication Source

Rule 29 Motion

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Defense renews motion pursuant to Rule 29 (Motion for Judgment of Acquittal).

Court proceeding
2021-12-18
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search