Ms. Sternheim

Person

Mentions

877

Relationships

Events

390

Documents

429

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

86 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
organization The Court	Legal representative	19 Very Strong	25	View
person Mr. Everdell	Co counsel	13 Very Strong	11	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Client	13 Very Strong	11	View
person Ms. Comey	Opposing counsel	12 Very Strong	10	View
person MS. POMERANTZ	Opposing counsel	12 Very Strong	11	View
person Kate	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person MR. ROHRBACH	Professional	10 Very Strong	14	View
person Judge	Professional	10 Very Strong	13	View
organization The Court	Professional	10 Very Strong	116	View
person MS. POMERANTZ	Professional	10 Very Strong	7	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Professional	10 Very Strong	8	View
person Ms. Moe	Professional	10 Very Strong	13	View
person Mr. Everdell	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person MR. PAGLIUCA	Professional	10 Very Strong	5	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Client	9 Strong	5	View
person Ms. Moe	Professional adversarial	9 Strong	5	View
person Ms. Comey	Professional	9 Strong	5	View
person Loftus	Legal representative	8 Strong	4	View
person MR. ROHRBACH	Opposing counsel	8 Strong	4	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Legal representative	8 Strong	4	View
person MS. MENNINGER	Professional	8 Strong	4	View
person Gill Velez	Professional	7	3	View
person MR. PAGLIUCA	Co counsel	7	3	View
person Ms. Conrad	Professional	7	2	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A court proceeding with the jury not present, where the judge calls for a recess and then a new w...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A discussion in court regarding the admission of email evidence. The judge rules that the dates o...	Courtroom (unspecified)	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A discussion took place regarding jury instructions, followed by the court calling a recess.	Courtroom in the Southern D...	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A discussion to determine the procedure for alternating peremptory strikes during jury selection.	Courtroom in the Southern D...	View
2022-08-10	Final pretrial conference	A discussion was held regarding the exclusion of witnesses from testimony under Federal Rule of E...	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	Mr. Rohrbach concludes his questioning of witness Gill Velez by directing the jury to Government ...	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	Court hearing	A legal argument between attorneys and a judge regarding whether Government Exhibit 824, containi...	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	Court hearing	A court proceeding where the government rested its case and the judge conducted a colloquy with t...	Courtroom in the Southern D...	View
2022-08-10	Jury dismissal	The court confirmed a unanimous jury verdict and formally dismissed the jury from service, provid...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court hearing	Discussion regarding Dr. Loftus's opinions on suggestive questioning, Agent Young's testimony, a ...	N/A	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A discussion in court regarding jury matters, including a response from the jurors, a confirmatio...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A court hearing where attorneys and the judge discuss an amendment to a witness's testimony and p...	N/A	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A court hearing where attorneys argue the relevance of evidence. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330...	N/A	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A discussion was held regarding a courthouse mask mandate and the fulfillment of requests for evi...	courthouse	View
2022-08-10	Admission of evidence	Government Exhibit 17 was received in evidence under seal to protect the identity of the witness.	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A court hearing, specifically a redirect examination of a witness named Jane, followed by a discu...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Meeting	Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Moe conferred during a break in the court proceedings.	Court	View
2022-08-10	Court hearing	A legal argument took place regarding the admissibility of information on a form. The discussion ...	Southern District Court (im...	View
2022-08-10	Legal proceeding	Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A sidebar discussion between the judge and counsel with the jury not present, where the judge mad...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court session	An afternoon session of a court proceeding where attorneys discuss exhibits and make requests to ...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A sidebar discussion during a court hearing or trial, specifically during the cross-examination o...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Legal proceeding	An opening statement was delivered by Ms. Sternheim in the case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.	Court	View
2022-08-10	Legal proceeding	A sidebar conversation during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to discuss the admissibility of te...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Court recess	The court takes a 45-minute luncheon recess. Proceedings are scheduled to resume with opening sta...	Courtroom	View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: THE COURT

Defense renews motion pursuant to Rule 29 (Motion for Judgment of Acquittal).

Court proceeding

2021-12-18

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search