Relationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | N/A | Twitter issued a statement regarding public response to leaders. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | A tweet by Roberts about Melania was reported to Twitter, which investigated and found no violati... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020966.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing a motion regarding Juror 50's conduct. The Court concludes that Juror 50's failure to disclose sexual abuse history on his questionnaire was inadvertent rather than intentional deception. Furthermore, applying the 'McDonough' legal standard, the Court determines that even if the juror had answered accurately, he would not have been struck for cause, as evidenced by his credible responses during a post-trial hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00020965.jpg
This document is a page from a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) addressing the conduct of 'Juror 50.' The text analyzes whether Juror 50 intended to deceive the court by not disclosing his history of sexual abuse on a questionnaire in November 2021, despite discussing it in media interviews in January 2022. The Court considers his explanation that watching the victims testify inspired him to speak out, and that he believed using only his first name in interviews would maintain his anonymity among friends and family.
DOJ-OGR-00020915.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing the 'Preliminary Instructions' for a juror questionnaire submitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It is dated March 8, 2022, and filed on March 9, 2022, specifically for 'Juror ID: 50' regarding the 'US v. Maxwell Post-verdict hearing' (Case 20cr330). The text outlines strict instructions for the juror, including the requirement for truthfulness, a ban on discussing the case, and a prohibition on conducting outside research.
DOJ-OGR-00020911.jpg
This document contains pages 43 and 44 of a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023. The text records the questioning of an individual (likely a juror) regarding their social media interactions with witness Annie Farmer and their failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse on a jury questionnaire. The respondent explains they thought the questionnaire did not ask about their 'personal abuse' and admits to making a 'huge mistake' in their interpretation.
DOJ-OGR-00016131.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002079.jpg
This document is a legal exhibit filed on December 14, 2020, compiling six social media posts from Twitter and Reddit between July 2019 and March 2020. The posts express extreme anger and contain explicit death threats against Ghislaine Maxwell for her alleged role in sex trafficking and sexual assault alongside Jeffrey Epstein. The threats include calls for her to be killed, lynched, and for her lawyers to be tortured to reveal her location.
DOJ-OGR-00002025.jpg
This legal document is a declaration from an unnamed individual defending Ghislaine against public accusations and media reports. The author attests that Ghislaine was not a fugitive but was forced into hiding due to a dangerous media frenzy, which included a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun newspaper, and threats on social media. The author asserts Ghislaine's consistent claims of innocence and her desire for a fair legal process to clear her name.
DOJ-OGR-00002020.jpg
This document is a page from a redacted declaration filed in December 2020 as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The author, whose identity is redacted but appears to be a close associate or partner of Maxwell, describes the intense media harassment, stalking, and threats they have faced since Epstein's death and Maxwell's arrest. The author explicitly states they never met or communicated with Jeffrey Epstein and expresses fear of violence fueled by conspiracy theories like QAnon and Pizzagate, citing the attack on Judge Salas.
DOJ-OGR-00021541.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 25, 2022, details a court's order regarding an inquiry into the truthfulness of answers provided by Juror 50. The court sets a deadline of March 1, 2022, for the parties to submit proposed questions for a hearing. The court denies the Defendant's broad subpoena requests for Juror 50's communications, social media history, and other records, labeling them a "vexatious, intrusive, unjustified, and a fishing expedition."
DOJ-OGR-00021533.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court order (Document 620) filed on February 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court rules that while a hearing is warranted regarding Juror 50's potential failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse, the Defendant has not justified an inquiry into Juror 50's social media usage. The Judge notes that Juror 50's minimal Twitter usage and explanation for deleting apps during jury selection do not implicate the 'McDonough' standard for juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg
This document is Page 43 of a legal filing (Document 615) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's request to compel the production of 'Juror 50's' (Scotty David) private emails and social media records (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram). The prosecution characterizes the defense's request as an inadmissible 'fishing expedition' and argues that the juror's post-trial media interviews or comments on a victim's Twitter post do not justify invading his privacy regarding pre-trial or during-trial communications.
DOJ-OGR-00009057.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details requests for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50." It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror. The document also describes how this juror and another juror, who both allegedly failed to disclose they were victims of childhood sexual abuse, discussed these experiences during deliberations, potentially influencing the verdict rendered by all 12 jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009050.jpg
This legal document argues that a juror, identified as Juror No. 50, engaged in a post-trial publicity tour, including a documentary interview, potentially for financial gain. The government's public filing of a letter (Docket No. 568) to stop the juror's media appearances is presented as a strategic move to prevent further scrutiny of the juror's conduct, which could have provided grounds for a new trial for the defendant, Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00009028.jpg
This document is a court filing from February 2022 containing screenshots of an Instagram account ('thisbeartravels') belonging to Scotty David (identified as Juror No. 50). The posts reveal David publicly discussing his role as a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and mentioning his use of therapy to deal with the stress of the case. The filing notes that Juror No. 50 deleted his social media accounts (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn) shortly after these posts were discovered.
DOJ-OGR-00009027.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, showing a screenshot of a deleted tweet from January 4, 2022. In the tweet, a user 'S' (implied to be Juror No. 50) tells '@anniefarmer' that her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document also states that Juror No. 50 posted about his jury service on Instagram, raising potential issues of juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009026.jpg
This document is a court filing (Page 25 of 66) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on 02/24/22. It presents a screenshot of Twitter activity involving 'Scotty David' (identified in the text as Juror No. 50), who interacted with witness Annie Farmer and journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The legal commentary notes that Juror No. 50 changed his handle to '@NycSsddd' and attempted to delete a tweet to Ms. Farmer shortly after sending it.
DOJ-OGR-00009025.jpg
This document is a court filing (Exhibit) related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed on February 24, 2022. It displays a screenshot of Twitter interactions involving Juror No. 50 (Scotty David), journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley, and witness Annie Farmer. The document highlights that Juror No. 50 publicly communicated with a witness (Farmer) on Twitter, stating her testimony was critical to the verdict, and used a Twitter handle matching his name given in press interviews.
DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
This legal document details a court's finding that Juror 50 is credible, despite inconsistencies in his jury selection questionnaire. The court analyzed a supportive comment the juror made on Twitter to Annie Farmer, concluding it did not contradict his testimony about not widely discussing his own sexual abuse. Ultimately, the court determined the juror's errors were not intentional deception and he would not have been dismissed for cause had he answered accurately.
DOJ-OGR-00010345.jpg
This legal document analyzes the motivations of Juror 50 for giving post-trial media interviews in which he disclosed his own past sexual abuse. Juror 50 explained he was inspired by the victims in the trial and believed not using his full name would limit the attention from his personal circle. The court concludes that his actions, including a social media interaction with Annie Farmer, do not suggest he intended to deceive when he completed his juror questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00010258.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a former juror regarding their post-trial social media activity, specifically a Twitter interaction with witness Annie Farmer where the juror thanked Farmer for sharing her story. The juror admits to being a victim of abuse and discusses their limited use of Twitter.
DOJ-OGR-00009899.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Juror No. 50 should not be granted discovery, specifically a copy of his questionnaire, in advance of a hearing regarding his alleged misconduct. The filing contends that the juror's presence on the jury violated Ms. Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial, constituting a reversible error that should lead the Court to vacate the verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009891.jpg
This legal document presents an argument on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, asserting that Juror No. 50 engaged in misconduct by providing false answers under oath during jury selection (voir dire). The filing refutes the government's counterarguments, claiming the juror's dishonesty about being a victim of sexual abuse and his use of Twitter demonstrates implied bias and a deliberate pattern of falsehoods that should have resulted in his exclusion from the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009841.jpg
This legal document argues against a defendant's request to compel the production of private communications from 'Juror 50', including emails and social media content from platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The author contends that the requests are an improper and invasive 'fishing expedition' that seeks inadmissible evidence, would harass the juror, and could inhibit future jury deliberations. The document urges the Court to reject all of the defendant's specific requests for information regarding the juror's communications, potential media payments, and social media activity.
DOJ-OGR-00009818.jpg
This legal document is a filing that refutes a defendant's claims that a juror, Juror 50, lied during the jury selection process (voir dire). The filing argues there is insufficient evidence to prove the juror deliberately lied about not being a victim of a crime or about his social media usage. It specifically addresses the juror's failure to mention an inactive Twitter account and the claim he deleted his Facebook and Instagram accounts, suggesting these were not material or deliberate falsehoods.
DOJ-OGR-00009748.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on March 11, 2022, outlines a request for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50". It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror regarding their jury service. The document also discusses a hearing concerning the misconduct, which involves another juror who also allegedly failed to disclose being a victim of childhood sexual abuse, potentially implicating the entire jury's verdict.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity