Relationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | N/A | Twitter issued a statement regarding public response to leaders. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | A tweet by Roberts about Melania was reported to Twitter, which investigated and found no violati... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009744.jpg
This document is page 52 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated March 11, 2022. It argues that 'Juror No. 50' provided false answers during voir dire regarding social media usage to hide biases and ensure selection, noting he later used Twitter to contact victim Annie Farmer and appeared in an ITV documentary. The text contrasts this behavior with Juror No. 55, whose falsehoods were exposed through follow-up questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00009742.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror No. 50 intentionally provided false answers during voir dire, particularly concerning his use of social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The document contends that this pattern of dishonesty, combined with his post-trial media engagement, casts doubt on the truthfulness of all his answers, including those meant to screen for bias against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It also mentions a letter from the government, published by the media, which is described as an attempt to silence the juror and circumvent court rules.
DOJ-OGR-00009741.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is a page from a motion arguing for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell. The argument centers on the post-trial conduct of 'Juror No. 50,' who allegedly engaged in a paid publicity tour, gave interviews for a documentary, and communicated with journalist Annie Farmer, demonstrating bias. The document criticizes the government for publicly filing a letter (Docket No. 568) to stop the juror's tour, arguing this was an improper procedure that alerted the juror to scrutiny, whereas Ms. Maxwell's counsel would have objected and preferred the matter be handled under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00009735.jpg
This document is a page from a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues for a new trial based on the alleged dishonesty of Juror No. 50 during voir dire, specifically regarding social media usage (Twitter/Instagram) and a failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse. The defense draws a parallel to Juror No. 55, who was dismissed for cause after similar dishonesty regarding Twitter was discovered.
DOJ-OGR-00009734.jpg
This document is legal filing (Page 42 of 66) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case, filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 demonstrated implied bias and lied during voir dire by concealing his history as a sexual abuse victim and his active use of social media (specifically Twitter) during the trial. The filing notes that the juror communicated directly with victim Annie Farmer via Twitter after the trial and framed the verdict as being 'for all the victims.'
DOJ-OGR-00009718.jpg
This legal document presents evidence of potential juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It includes a screenshot of a deleted tweet, allegedly from Juror No. 50, to a witness/victim (@anniefarmer), stating her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document further alleges that this juror posted about his jury service on Instagram in early January 2022, despite having told the Court during voir dire that he had deleted his account.
DOJ-OGR-00009717.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022. It contains a screenshot of the Twitter profile for 'Scotty David' (Juror No. 50), showing tweets from Annie Farmer and Lucia Osborne-Crowley discussing the juror's disclosure of his own trauma during an exclusive interview. The text below the image notes that Juror No. 50 changed his handle to '@NycSsddd' and attempted to delete a tweet sent to Ms. Farmer shortly after sending it.
DOJ-OGR-00009715.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing dated March 11, 2022, concerning the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It presents evidence of social media activity, including tweets from journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley about her interview with a juror named 'Scotty', and a responsive tweet from 'annie farmer'. The document highlights that 'Juror No. 50' (presumably Scotty) subsequently interacted with Farmer's tweet, suggesting this interaction is relevant to the legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00009714.jpg
This document appears to be page 22 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated March 11, 2022. It details a transcript or account of an interview where 'Juror No. 50' is challenged regarding the accuracy of his jury questionnaire responses concerning sexual abuse victimization (specifically question 48). The text notes the juror's physical reaction (flushing red) and his verbal defense claiming honesty. It transitions to a section regarding the juror's social media activity involving Annie Farmer and journalist Ms. Osborne-Crawley.
DOJ-OGR-00009708.jpg
This is page 16 of a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document discusses the final composition of the jury, noting that 694 potential jurors answered a questionnaire. A footnote explains that defense counsel was unable to find the Twitter account of 'Juror No. 50' during the voir dire process.
DOJ-OGR-00009658.jpg
This document is page 21 of a legal filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 1, 2022, and addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It consists of a series of questions directed at a juror from the trial, focusing on their reasons for speaking publicly after the verdict. The questions probe the juror's statements to the media, their social media posts revealing their role, and their perspective as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse serving on the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court filing (Document 620) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated February 25, 2022. The text discusses a post-trial motion regarding 'Juror 50,' specifically addressing whether the juror lied during voir dire about social media usage. The Court ruled that a hearing is warranted regarding specific questionnaire answers but denied the Defendant's request to probe the juror's social media history, citing that the juror's minimal Twitter usage and explanation for deleting apps were consistent with their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00014586.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005360.jpg
This document is a page of jury instructions from a court case filed on October 22, 2021. It outlines the defendant's rights, including the presumption of innocence and the right not to testify, and clarifies that the government holds the burden of proof. The instructions strictly forbid jurors from consuming any media, conducting independent research (including on the internet), or discussing the case with anyone—including family, colleagues, and fellow jurors—until deliberations officially begin.
DOJ-OGR-00005336.jpg
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire from legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire probes a potential juror's media consumption habits, social media usage, viewership of crime-related content, and their opinion on the trustworthiness of the media.
DOJ-OGR-00005324.jpg
This document is a jury instruction sheet for the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 22, 2021. It summarizes the six-count indictment against Maxwell, which alleges she conspired with and aided Jeffrey Epstein in sex trafficking of minors between 1994 and 2004. The document provides strict instructions to potential jurors, prohibiting them from conducting outside research or discussing the case, and notes the trial is set to begin on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005320.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on October 22, 2021, containing instructions to the jury pool. The text outlines strict prohibitions against jurors discussing the case on social media or conducting independent research via Google or news outlets. It also details privacy and safety measures due to the 'high-profile' nature of the case and COVID-19, including the use of juror numbers instead of names and the provision of daily transportation for jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00005280.jpg
This document is Page 4 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains preliminary instructions for prospective jurors regarding a questionnaire, emphasizing the legal requirement to provide truthful answers under oath. The text explicitly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, using social media (citing Facebook and Twitter) to communicate about it, or conducting independent research.
DOJ-OGR-00008714.jpg
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019786.jpg
This document appears to be page 298 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the operational fallout of the Edward Snowden leaks, specifically how terrorist targets using platforms like Xbox Live, Twitter, and Facebook ceased using these methods ('went dark') after the PRISM program was revealed in June 2013. The text cites NSA officials Richard Ledgett and Admiral Rogers confirming that the leaks resulted in a loss of surveillance capabilities against groups planning attacks in Europe and the US.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019608.jpg
This page from the book "How America Lost Its Secrets" discusses the significant erosion of personal privacy due to modern technology and digital services. It details how entities like phone companies, Google, social media platforms, and credit card companies collect vast amounts of surveillance data and metadata for profit, rendering the concept of privacy largely illusory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019589.jpg
This document is page 101 of a book (likely titled 'The Plot to Hack America' or similar based on context and ISBN in footer) produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. It details Julian Assange's involvement in Edward Snowden's flight to Russia, specifically noting Assange's advice to avoid Ecuador in favor of Russia and his deployment of WikiLeaks staffer Sarah Harrison to Hong Kong to assist Snowden. It also provides background on Harrison's family connections in Hong Kong and her operational security measures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019406.jpg
An email chain from March 2011 between publicist R. Couri Hay and Jeffrey Epstein regarding an upcoming Newsweek profile. Hay informs Epstein that Tina Brown has assigned Alexandra Wolfe to write a story about Epstein's 'reemergence' in New York and his connection to Prince Andrew. Hay leverages his friendship with the journalist to solicit employment from Epstein, promising to 'spin' the story positively, and noting that high-profile associates like Donald Trump, Leon Black, and Les Wexner have already been contacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity