New Hampshire
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001125.jpg
This document is a page from a defense motion filed on December 14, 2020, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell did not attempt to evade arrest or flee. Defense counsel claims the 'raid' on her New Hampshire home was unnecessary and theatrical, timed to the anniversary of Epstein's arrest. It addresses specific allegations, such as a cell phone wrapped in tin foil, explaining these were security measures against the press, supported by a statement from the (redacted) head of her security team.
DOJ-OGR-00001124.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that she was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her legal counsel was in regular, documented contact with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive by demonstrating her intent to remain in the U.S. and face any potential charges.
DOJ-OGR-00001082.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney is arguing against their client being a flight risk. The attorney distinguishes their client's case from the U.S. v. Zarger case cited by the government, noting their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to leave the country. The attorney also references a prior felony conviction of a Mr. Epstein and a previous proceeding before Judge Berman.
DOJ-OGR-00001029.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning the case against Ms. Maxwell. A speaker, likely the prosecutor, argues that Maxwell is a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, which involve an "ongoing scheme to abuse multiple victims" with Jeffrey Epstein, and her recent efforts to conceal her whereabouts in New England. The judge then questions a lawyer, Ms. Moe, about a defense claim that Maxwell had maintained contact with the government through her counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00001022.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 1, 2021, is a transcript detailing the government's process for notifying victims following the arrest of a defendant on July 2 of the previous year. It outlines a timeline of actions taken in July, including notifying victims of the arrest, court hearings, and their right to be heard, utilizing direct contact, a victim services website, and letters. The notifications were sent to victims of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000996.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing against bail for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It highlights her significant flight risk due to access to millions of dollars in foreign accounts (Swiss and English banks), recent large financial transfers into a trust, and the cash purchase of a New Hampshire hideout property. The prosecution argues the proposed $5 million bond is insufficient given her wealth.
DOJ-OGR-00000960.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a legal filing (Document 18) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 10, 2020. It lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and several other cases regarding bail and detention, referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3142.
DOJ-OGR-00000935.jpg
This legal document argues against the government's assertion that Ghislaine Maxwell was a flight risk. It contends she was not hiding before her arrest, but was living openly in her New Hampshire home and communicating with the government via her lawyers. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid, and includes a quote from an FBI official confirming the agency knew her whereabouts.
DOJ-OGR-00000917.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) presenting the 'Facts' from the defense's perspective regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her arrest in New Hampshire in July 2020, characterizing it as unnecessary and 'showy,' and harshly criticizes her confinement conditions, comparing her isolation to that of Hannibal Lecter and alleging sleep deprivation and invasive searches.
DOJ-OGR-00002247.jpg
This page from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against granting bail to Ghislaine Maxwell, citing her lack of US employment ties, significant foreign connections, and flight risk. The text details her history of providing 'incomplete or erroneous' financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically noting a July 2020 incident where she underreported assets at $3.5 million and misrepresented her ownership status of a New Hampshire property. It references a report by the accounting firm Macalvins intended to clarify her finances.
DOJ-OGR-00002247(1).jpg
This document is page 15 of a court filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text argues for continued detention, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing incomplete financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting assets by omitting spousal assets and trust accounts in July 2020. It references a financial report prepared by the accounting firm Macalvins and disputes Maxwell's defense that her financial misrepresentations were due to lack of access to records while detained.
DOJ-OGR-00002234(1).jpg
This document is page 2 of a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing flight risk, substantial resources, foreign citizenship in a non-extradition country, and lack of candor regarding finances. It outlines the background of the case, including the June 2020 indictment for facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors and the Defendant's subsequent arrest in New Hampshire.
DOJ-OGR-00002188.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing opposing bail (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It argues the defendant is a flight risk due to sophisticated financial maneuvering, specifically transferring millions of dollars into trusts for her spouse to hide her true wealth ($20M+) while claiming to have only $3.4M. It highlights a lack of candor with Pretrial Services regarding her assets and the ownership of her New Hampshire residence.
DOJ-OGR-00002188(1).jpg
This document is a Government filing from December 2020 opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application. It argues she is a flight risk who has sophisticatedly hidden her wealth by transferring millions into trusts for her spouse over the preceding five years. The text highlights a financial discrepancy where she brought over $20 million to the marriage while her spouse contributed only $200,000, and notes her 'lack of candor' with Pretrial Services regarding property ownership.
DOJ-OGR-00002178.jpg
This page from a government filing (opposition to bail) argues that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) is a flight risk. It highlights that her marriage is not a sufficient tie to the US, noting she lived alone while hiding in New Hampshire and that she and her spouse listed themselves as 'single' on bank trust account forms in 2018. The document also dismisses the defense's offer to waive extradition rights, particularly noting that France generally does not extradite its own nationals.
DOJ-OGR-00002001.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues that she did not attempt to avoid arrest. The defense counters the government's claims by stating they would have arranged for a self-surrender if asked and that her actions during the arrest, such as moving to an interior room and having a phone wrapped in tin foil, were pre-arranged security measures to protect her from the press, not to evade law enforcement. This claim is supported by a newly obtained statement from the head of her security company.
DOJ-OGR-00001955.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where an attorney argues for their client, likely concerning bail. The attorney refutes the government's claim that the client is a flight risk by distinguishing the current case from precedents like 'U.S. v. Zarger' and a prior case involving a 'Mr. Epstein', emphasizing that their client was in New Hampshire at the time of arrest and not making plans to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00001936.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where a defense attorney argues about their client's financial situation. The attorney disputes the government's claims, stating the client does not have wealth comparable to figures like Madoff or Dreier, and criticizes the government for arresting her just before a holiday and then questioning her financial disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00001906.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues to a judge that the defendant is not being truthful about her financial situation. The speaker highlights the defendant's lifestyle, which seems inconsistent with her disclosed assets, and points to a specific instance of non-transparency regarding a property in New Hampshire. The government is actively investigating this property transaction, having had an F.B.I. agent interview the real estate agent involved.
DOJ-OGR-00001902.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. A prosecutor argues that the defendant is a significant flight risk due to the serious nature of the charges, which involve an alleged long-term scheme of abusing minors with Jeffrey Epstein, and her recent efforts to conceal her whereabouts in New England. The judge then interrupts to question an attorney, Ms. Moe, about a specific assertion made by the defense concerning Ms. Maxwell's contact with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00019493.jpg
This page from a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that government officials (Ms. Strauss and FBI Agent William Sweeney) and private attorneys (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Bradley Edwards) made prohibited, prejudicial public statements regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document cites specific quotes comparing Maxwell to a 'snake' and 'villain,' as well as speculation about her potential cooperation with prosecutors to implicate other 'wealthy and influential people.' The filing asserts these comments violate Local Rule 23.1.
DOJ-OGR-00019492.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that her right to a fair trial has been prejudiced by public statements made by the prosecution. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss following Maxwell's July 2, 2020 arrest, quoting her statements to the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of prejudicial commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00019231.jpg
This document is a 'Commitment to Another District' order filed on July 2, 2020, in Case 1:20-mj-00132 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell). United States Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone orders the U.S. Marshal to transport the defendant from the current district (New Hampshire) to the charging district (SDNY) and to notify the U.S. Attorney upon arrival.
DOJ-OGR-00019226.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, presents an argument for the partial closure of court proceedings due to the public health risks of COVID-19. It cites statistics on the virus's spread in New Hampshire and nationally to emphasize the danger to all participants. The document references the case 'United States v. Smith' as a legal precedent for policies that constitute a partial closure of a courtroom for security or safety reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00019225.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing dated July 2, 2020, which outlines the court's findings for partially closing a proceeding. The court justifies this closure by citing the substantial interest in protecting public health and safety from the spread of COVID-19, referencing the 5,802 confirmed cases and 373 deaths in New Hampshire since the pandemic began.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity