New Hampshire
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00018572.pdf
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
EFTA00017734.pdf
This document is an internal email from the Chief of the Criminal Division at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated July 2, 2020. It serves as a notification that an indictment is being unsealed against Ghislaine Maxwell for facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minors and confirms her arrest in New Hampshire earlier that morning.
EFTA00017732.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from July 2, 2020, involving the Chief of the Criminal Division at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence confirms the unsealing of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell and her arrest in New Hampshire that morning. The emails discuss the logistics of the announcement occurring before a holiday weekend during the pandemic.
EFTA00016286.pdf
This document is an opposition letter filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe's counsel against Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay civil proceedings in the case Doe v. Indyke. The Plaintiff argues that Maxwell has been actively participating in the litigation from jail (filing answers, issuing discovery requests) despite claiming it is a burden, and that a stay is not required for Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Claims Resolution Program. The letter asserts that the public interest is best served by allowing the civil case to proceed to expose the criminal enterprise of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00016175.pdf
This document is an email chain between officials from the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office and likely the BOP/USMS regarding the arrest and detention of Ghislaine Maxwell on July 2, 2020. The correspondence discusses her immediate housing in New Hampshire, safety precautions citing 'the history here' (likely referencing Epstein), and the plan to transfer her to MDC Brooklyn. The emails confirm she was in a local facility in New Hampshire and scheduled for a virtual presentation.
EFTA00016163.pdf
This document consists of an email chain dated July 2, 2020, coordinating the distribution of a 'SDNY Premises Search Warrant Bundle' and a signed affidavit. The correspondence involves the FBI (New York office), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and the US Attorney's Office for New Hampshire (USANH). The date and agencies involved align with the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire.
EFTA00016162.pdf
This document is an email dated July 1, 2020, with the subject 'Draft SW' (Search Warrant). It transmits an attachment titled 'New_Hampshire_Premises_SW_Affidavit.docx', indicating legal preparation for a search of a property in New Hampshire. The sender and recipients are redacted, but the timing coincides closely with the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire.
EFTA00016161.pdf
This document is an email dated July 2, 2020, sent to an official at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject is 'SW Affidavit' (Search Warrant Affidavit), and it includes an attachment titled 'New_Hampshire_Premises_SW_Affidavit_v2.docx'. This timing and content strongly suggest it is related to the search warrant executed for the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell at her New Hampshire property on that same day.
EFTA00013307.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court found that Maxwell presents a significant flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, international ties (citizenship in France and UK), and lack of candor regarding her finances. The proposed $28.5 million bail package and offer to waive extradition rights were deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at trial.
EFTA00010376.pdf
This document is an email thread dated July 2, 2020, between individuals associated with the US Attorney's Office for the District of New Hampshire (USANH). The subject concerns a 'SDNY Premises Search Warrant Bundle (second revised) copy,' likely related to the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell which occurred on this date in New Hampshire. The email includes a PDF attachment of the warrant bundle.
EFTA00010372.pdf
This document is an email chain forwarding an automatic notice from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The notice confirms that on July 6, 2020, attorney Lawrence A. Vogelman filed a Notice of Attorney Appearance to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ. The document includes technical metadata and timestamps associated with the electronic filing system.
DOJ-OGR-00001895.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Dec 10, 2020) detailing the government's efforts to notify victims regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines specific dates in July 2020 when notifications were sent regarding her arrest, presentment, and bail hearing. It explicitly mentions notifications sent to individuals identifying as victims of both Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, even those not named in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001716.jpg
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 10, 2020. The defense requests the disclosure of the identities of 'Victims 1-3' to prepare for trial and argues that Maxwell is being subjected to uniquely harsh confinement conditions at the MDC as a direct reaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in 2019. The letter details Epstein's timeline of detention and death to contextualize the extreme surveillance and isolation Maxwell is facing.
DOJ-OGR-00001708.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal filing dated August 10, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues for the disclosure of the identities of Victims 1-3 and protests the harsh confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The document explicitly claims Maxwell's treatment (isolation, 24-hour surveillance, suicide watch protocols) is a direct reaction by the BOP to the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein at the MCC in 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00001638.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is page 4 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues that public statements made by FBI Special Agent William Sweeney and attorneys for witnesses (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Bradley Edwards) are prejudicial against Ghislaine Maxwell and violate local court rules. The document quotes these individuals characterizing Maxwell as a villain, speculating on her cooperation, and defining her role as the primary facilitator for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that recent public statements by the government have been prejudicial to her right to a fair trial. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss on July 2, 2020, following Maxwell's arrest, quoting her statements from the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of improper commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00001622.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 13, 2020, argues that a defendant is a flight risk due to significant undisclosed financial assets. It details her access to millions of dollars in foreign bank accounts in Switzerland and England, including a trust account with over $4 million, and highlights several large transactions. The document also notes her recent arrest at a New Hampshire property purchased for over $1 million in cash, suggesting she has not been forthcoming about her wealth and has the means to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00001618.jpg
This document details the July 2, 2020 arrest of the defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell) at a remote New Hampshire property. It describes her attempt to flee from agents inside the house and the discovery of a cell phone wrapped in tin foil to evade detection. The text also notes that the defendant's brother hired a security team of former British military members to guard her, and that the property was purchased in cash by an LLC.
DOJ-OGR-00001584.jpg
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a legal filing, specifically a Table of Authorities listing case law citations. It was filed on July 10, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell). The page lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Kashoggi', referencing rulings from the S.D.N.Y., 2nd Circuit, and other jurisdictions regarding bail or detention issues (inferred from the statute 18 U.S.C. § 3142).
DOJ-OGR-00001531.jpg
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated July 2, 2020. It records a sealed docket entry for the "Arrest (Removal) of Ghislaine Maxwell" in case number 1:20-mj-00132-AJ. The notice explicitly states that because the case is sealed, no electronic public or participant notices were distributed.
DOJ-OGR-00001523.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated July 6, 2020. It argues for a 'partial closure' of the courtroom proceedings due to the health risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, citing specific infection statistics for New Hampshire and the United States. The document references the legal precedent *United States v. Smith* to justify security measures and closures in the interest of public safety.
DOJ-OGR-00001522.jpg
This document is page 24 of 33 from a court filing (Document 62) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 6, 2020. The text outlines the court's justification for a 'partial closure' of proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic, citing legal precedent regarding public access to courts versus health safety concerns. It specifically references COVID-19 statistics in New Hampshire as of July 2, 2020, to support findings of necessity.
DOJ-OGR-00001211.jpg
This legal document is a court order denying a defendant's renewed motion for release on bail. The court justifies the denial by citing the seriousness of the charges (facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse), strong government evidence, the defendant's substantial financial resources, foreign ties to a non-extradition country, and a lack of candor about her finances, concluding she is a flight risk. The document outlines the case's background, including the indictment on June 29, 2020, her arrest on July 2, 2020, and the denial of her first bail motion on July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001169.jpg
This court document outlines the Government's argument regarding the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application, focusing on her financial assets and lack of candor. It alleges she transferred the majority of her wealth (over $20 million brought to the marriage versus her husband's $200k) into trusts for her spouse to hide assets, including funds used to buy her New Hampshire hideout. The text highlights discrepancies between her actual wealth and what she disclosed to Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00001159.jpg
This is page 14 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00001159) of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues against bail, citing the defendant's flight risk, wealth, and ability to frustrate extradition from France or the UK. A critical footnote reveals that in 2018, the defendant and her spouse established a trust account where they both falsely listed their marital status as 'single' on bank forms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity