New Hampshire
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00019200.jpg
This document is a 'Commitment to Another District' filed on July 2, 2020, by the United States District Court, District of New Hampshire, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It details charges including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury, alleged to have been committed in the Southern District of New York. The document also notes her bond status and legal representation by Lawrence Vogelman.
DOJ-OGR-00019196.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues for a partial courtroom closure due to the public health risks of COVID-19. It cites statistics on the virus's spread in New Hampshire and nationally, and references the legal precedent from 'United States v. Smith' concerning a U.S. Marshal's policy implemented after September 11th.
DOJ-OGR-00019195.jpg
This is page 3 of a court filing (Document 2) from July 2, 2020, associated with Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ (The United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document justifies a 'partial closure' of court proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic, citing New Hampshire health statistics and legal precedents regarding public access to courts.
DOJ-OGR-00009148.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, discusses the legal standard for juror bias in sexual abuse cases. The author argues against a mandatory presumption of bias for jurors who have experienced sexual abuse, distinguishing the current case from a New Hampshire state decision (State v. Ashfar). The document asserts that the court correctly conducted targeted follow-up inquiries to determine impartiality rather than automatically striking such jurors, which is consistent with the law in the circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00009042.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a motion arguing for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell. It cites the 2018 New Hampshire case, State v. Ashfar, as precedent, where a new trial was granted because a juror failed to disclose during voir dire that he was a victim of sexual assault. The document draws a parallel between the juror in Ashfar and 'Juror No. 50' in Maxwell's case, suggesting a similar false denial of personal experience warrants a new trial.
DOJ-OGR-00019853.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she was living openly in her New Hampshire home, her lawyers were in communication with the government, and she had not left the U.S. for years. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid as a reason for her to seek privacy for safety.
DOJ-OGR-00019835.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) presenting facts about Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest and detention. It argues that Maxwell, a 59-year-old citizen with no prior criminal history, was subjected to an unnecessary SWAT raid in July 2020 despite being in contact with authorities. The text details her 'nightmarish' prison conditions, comparing them to those of 'Hannibal Lecter,' citing isolation, sleep deprivation, and invasive searches.
DOJ-OGR-00010578.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against leniency for the defendant, Maxwell, by highlighting her privileged background and a significant pattern of dishonesty. It provides two key examples of her dishonest conduct: lying under oath in a 2016 civil deposition related to a lawsuit by Virginia Roberts, and misleading Pretrial Services about her finances and home ownership in New Hampshire upon her arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00010453.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was not a flight risk despite her foreign nationalities and remained in the United States after Epstein's death. It states her presence in New Hampshire was for her own protection and that her lawyers were in contact with prosecutors for a self-surrender. The document contends that her detention on July 6, 2020, and subsequent denial of four bail applications were based on an unfounded claim of flight risk by the government.
DOJ-OGR-00010452.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from June 15, 2022, argues against harsh sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming she is a victim of public condemnation and scapegoating. It details her arrest on July 2, 2020, in New Hampshire, framing her relocation as an escape from media intrusion rather than law enforcement. The document also cites a past trauma from her childhood, where she was allegedly on an Irish Republican Army "hit list," to explain her heightened fear and need for security.
DOJ-OGR-00009827.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the issue of juror bias in sexual abuse cases. The author argues against a mandatory presumption of bias for jurors who are survivors of sexual abuse, citing legal precedents like State v. Ashfar and Torres. The document asserts that the court correctly conducted targeted inquiries into jurors' ability to be impartial, rather than automatically striking them, noting that a contrary rule would disqualify a large portion of the jury pool.
DOJ-OGR-00020087.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing opposing the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) bail application. It argues she is a flight risk who has sophisticatedly hidden her wealth by transferring millions of dollars to her spouse through trusts over the last five years, noting she brought over $20 million to the marriage while he brought only $200,000. The text highlights her lack of candor with Pretrial Services regarding her net worth and the ownership of her New Hampshire residence.
DOJ-OGR-00020077.jpg
This page from a government filing (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues that the defendant is a flight risk. It highlights her time hiding in New Hampshire, her foreign ties to the UK and France, and the difficulty of extradition. A footnote reveals that in 2018, despite being married, both the defendant and her spouse listed their status as 'single' on bank trust account forms, which the government cites as evidence of a lack of candor.
DOJ-OGR-00020043.jpg
This legal document is a filing from Ms. Maxwell's defense team arguing that she was not trying to avoid arrest or hide from law enforcement. The defense claims they would have arranged a self-surrender if requested and that her actions during the arrest, such as moving to an interior room and wrapping a phone in foil, were pre-arranged security measures to protect herself from the press, not to evade officers. A new statement from the head of her security company is presented as evidence to support this claim.
DOJ-OGR-00020042.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her defense counsel was in regular communication with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive who was hiding and changing locations.
DOJ-OGR-00020142.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court argues against granting bail, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing erroneous financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting her assets in July 2020 by omitting her spouse's assets and trust accounts.
DOJ-OGR-00020129.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court cites her substantial resources, foreign ties (including citizenship in a non-extradition country), history of living in hiding, and lack of candor regarding finances as reasons for considering her a flight risk. The background section outlines the timeline of her indictment in June 2020, arrest in New Hampshire in July 2020, and the previous denial of bail on July 14, 2020.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016528.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing 'Declination Oversight,' comparing U.S. and European approaches to prosecutorial discretion and private prosecution. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state laws (RI, NH, NC, OK, PA) and legal scholarship regarding grand juries and selective prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016522.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.jpg
An email from 'jeffrey E.' (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) to 'BS Stern' dated August 9, 2018. The sender discusses the political climate involving Donald Trump, the Mueller investigation, and Brett Kavanaugh, while proposing the idea of a 'third choice presidential run' and a 'chaos candidate' for 2020 as a back-up plan to the traditional two-party system.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017733.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 11. It argues for a rule change requiring prosecutors to notify victims of plea negotiations and for courts to consider victims' views before accepting plea agreements. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement, which was criticized for violating these exact principles of victim notification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026808.jpg
This document is a presentation slide (page 14) from Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs, authored by Francis J. Kelly. It outlines a schedule of United States primary elections/caucuses spanning from January 18th to March 22nd (likely referencing the 2016 election cycle based on the 'Super Tuesday' date of March 1st). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation involving Deutsche Bank.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017703.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen, which cites a 2007 Utah Law Review article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for a broad interpretation of a victim's right to be heard in court proceedings, citing legislative history from Senators Feinstein and Kyl. It proposes a new rule (Rule 60(b)) regarding the enforcement of victims' rights and preserving claimed error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017248.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of such document dumps) discussing legal history. It details the 1963 Supreme Court dissent in *Rudolph v. Alabama* regarding the death penalty for rape, specifically focusing on Justices Brennan and Douglas. It highlights the media backlash, specifically an aggressive editorial from the *New Hampshire Union Leader* accusing the justices of encouraging rape.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027943.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir (likely by Ehud Barak, given the context of House Oversight investigations into Epstein associates) describing the immediate aftermath of the Six-Day War in 1967. The narrator recounts the personal grief of visiting the brother (Eliezer/Cheetah) of a fallen comrade (Nechemia) and reflects on the profound psychological and physical changes in Israel following the expansion of its territory. The page is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity