Trove
Sign In Sign Up

GOVERNMENT

Organization
Mentions
2805
Relationships
178
Events
870
Documents
1344
Also known as:
Government of Australia Government of the Republic of Cyprus United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Office of Government Relations PRC Government US Government (The Americans) Government Exhibit Office of Government Information Services Government / USA Orban Government Palestinian government IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE) Hamas Government Saudi Arabian government Orange County, California (Government) Netanyahu government British Government American government Pakistan Government/Military Canadian Government Australian government Government of Ecuador New Zealand Government Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Gov't (Government) Government / DOJ American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals United States of America (Government) US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
178 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
15 Very Strong
29
View
organization Defense
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
21
View
person defendant
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
62
View
person Defense counsel
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
55
View
person Recipient
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Adversarial
11 Very Strong
10
View
person MAXWELL
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
14
View
person the defendant
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person THOMAS
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
21
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
7
View
person defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
24
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization Defense
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Thomas
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
7
2
View
person Minor Victims
Protective
7
2
View
person Epstein's counsel
Professional
7
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal action The Government charged Maxwell with perjury in connection with civil cases. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding An appeal by Maxwell regarding an Order to prevent documents in a civil case from being unsealed. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A pending criminal case involving the parties. District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A bail revocation hearing in the LaFontaine case that lasted three days and involved a significan... Court View
N/A Investigation The government has been investigating the case for ten years. N/A View
N/A Legal argument The Appellant argues that all charges are barred by the five-year statute of limitations for nonc... this Circuit View
N/A Legal proceeding Discussion in court about Court Exhibit #15, where the government clarified the scope of the jury... Court View
N/A Victim notification The government notified six individuals, who were proved at trial to be directly impacted by the ... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Government submits that the Court should conduct a questioning of Juror 50 to determine poten... N/A View
N/A Trial The document describes the procedural steps of a criminal trial, including opening statements, pr... Court View
N/A Negotiation Negotiations between the Government and Epstein's counsel regarding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A grand jury subpoena was issued as part of a government investigation. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A motion for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell, based on issues with a juror's answers during voir dire. N/A View
N/A Proposed hearing A potential 'Show Hearing' is mentioned, which the filing argues the Court should reject and outl... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The trial of Ms. Maxwell, where the government argued its theory of a single conspiracy to the jury. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Jury instruction (Instruction No. 15) for Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activ... N/A View
N/A Investigation A government investigation was conducted. N/A View
N/A N/A Filing of a criminal complaint District Court View
N/A Jury instruction A judge provides Instruction No. 39 to the jury regarding the legal concept of 'Conscious Avoidan... N/A View
N/A Grand jury proceeding The document discusses the potential disclosure of materials from a grand jury proceeding. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding An interlocutory appeal by Maxwell concerning an unsealing order, which the document argues shoul... N/A View
N/A Legal case The photograph is marked as Exhibit 256 for the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Jury instruction within the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE regarding the use of electronic communic... N/A View
N/A Seizure of evidence The Government seized electronic communications from computers or electronic accounts to be used ... N/A View
N/A Criminal case A criminal case, identified as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, in which Ms. Maxwell is the defendant. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00013695.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Farmer's journal entries from January 7th and January 25th, 1996, specifically establishing that Ghislaine Maxwell was not mentioned in these entries. The witness confirms adding details retrospectively in the January 25th entry, including going to see a play.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013691.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and counsel (Ms. Menninger, Ms. Pomerantz) during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The parties address a terminological issue regarding the admission of exhibits labeled "AF1" and "Government Exhibit 603," with the court deciding to temporarily admit a seven-page version of AF1 under seal. Ms. Menninger also notes a disagreement over redactions, which is deferred to a later time to avoid delaying the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013689.jpg

This document is page 98 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her past hopes that Epstein (referenced as 'Maria's boss') would pay for her college or help her gain admission. The testimony confirms she wrote these hopes down before traveling to New York but did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell in those specific notes.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013678.jpg

This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger cross-examines witness A. Farmer about a journal entry, establishing that the witness returned from a week-long trip to New York on January 7th, 1996. The questioning references 'Government Exhibit 603', which is the witness's journal.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013653.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of a witness identified as A. Farmer (Annie). The witness recounts being interviewed by agents in late 2006 or early 2007 about a pair of boots and describes a six-week service trip to Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. The transcript concludes with an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requesting that 'Government Exhibit 103' be shown to the witness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013629.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) is questioned by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness reads a diary entry from January 25, 1996, which describes her activities in New York, including seeing plays and attending a New Year's Eve party at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. The diary entry is admitted into evidence as Government Exhibit 604 over an objection from Ms. Menninger.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013628.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Annie Farmer. The questioning focuses on a journal entry, presented as Government Exhibit 604, in which Farmer describes a trip to New York with her friend Maria. The entry details a positive experience, including visiting Jeff Epstein's house for champagne and finding him 'down-to-earth' before seeing the play 'Phantom of the Opera'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013625.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Annie Farmer. She testifies about visiting someone named Epstein when she was 16, her hopes at the time for an international trip, and her practice of keeping a journal. The witness identifies a notebook, marked as Government Exhibit 601, as the journal she used during that period.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013619.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York after Christmas 1995, where she stayed with her sister for about a week and met Jeffrey Epstein twice. The witness is also asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 101', which she confirms is her high school photo from her junior year.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013612.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (age 42) by Ms. Pomerantz. The text includes judicial instructions regarding the relevance of testimony concerning 'illegal sexual activity' relative to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, and the introduction of Government Exhibit 13, which is noted as being under seal.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013605.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of testimony in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, calls William Brown to the stand as a witness. After being sworn in, Mr. Brown states his name and testifies that he works for the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Division of Field Investigations.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013604.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a courtroom exchange where Prosecutor Ms. Moe asks jurors to review Government Exhibit 52G (sealed), specifically trying to point them to entries regarding 'massage, Florida.' Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to this direction, and the objection is sustained by the Court, allowing jurors to review the document without specific direction.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013601.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the judge and two counsels, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, clarifying that only specific parts ('subletters') of an evidence item ('52') are being moved into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with counsel that they are ready to proceed and instructs that the jury be brought in.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013595.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Moe regarding the procedural handling of an exhibit numbered '52'. The attorneys raise concerns about the exhibit's partial admission, relevance, and the jury's ability to evaluate its authenticity and weight without access to the full physical object.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013594.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the judge. Mr. Pagliuca clarifies his objection concerning an exhibit, explaining that while he agrees to photocopies being shown to the jury as requested by the government, he insists the complete, original exhibit be entered into the official record for any future appellate proceedings. The core issue is the distinction between the evidence presented to the jury and the evidence preserved for the formal court record.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013590.jpg

This document is the final page (49 of 49) of a court transcript index filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witness Tracy Chapell by attorneys Mr. Rohrbach (Direct) and Mr. Everdell (Cross). It also indexes Government Exhibits 801-803 and Defendant Exhibit TC-1.

Court transcript index / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013580.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The questioning focuses on an invoice detailing package shipments from 2002, establishing that J. Epstein sent a package to a recipient referred to as "Jane" on December 12, 2002. The testimony explicitly clarifies that the sender was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and also mentions a separate FedEx shipment from December 9, 2002.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013579.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The testimony focuses on a FedEx shipment from December 12, 2002, sent by 'J. Epstein' to a recipient named 'Cardine' in West Palm Beach, Florida. The questioning attorney specifically seeks to establish that the sender was Jeffrey Epstein, not Ghislaine Maxwell.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013574.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Chapell) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on a shipping invoice from 'October' where Ghislaine Maxwell is listed as the sender and Casey Wasserman is the recipient, with Jeffrey Epstein and the address 457 Madison Avenue also listed on the document. The defense specifically establishes that this invoice does not contain any transaction involving a recipient named 'Carolyn'.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013569.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The testimony concerns a package sent on October 7, 2002, which listed the names Cecilia Steen and Jeffrey E. Epstein, had a shipping address of 457 Madison Avenue, New York, and was sent to a recipient named Caroline in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013566.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony focuses on an invoice, identified as Government Exhibit 801, where Ms. Chapell confirms that Jeffrey E. Epstein is the account holder. She further testifies that S. Kellen was the sender of a related package, with Epstein's name also appearing on it.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013561.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the court proceedings as they resume, with the judge bringing in the jury and then allowing the government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, to call his next witness, Tracy Chapell, for direct examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022. The judge and attorneys for the government and defense discuss the scheduling of future trial events, such as the charge conference and closing arguments, which depends on when the defense will rest its case. A defense attorney, Ms. Comey, also brings up an unresolved issue regarding a subpoena issued to a Mr. Glassman.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013556.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 757, filed 2022-08-10). The discussion primarily revolves around the nature of closing arguments, the proper method for presenting evidence (specifically regarding a witness's personal experience), and an 'Exhibit 52 issue.' The Court, Ms. Moe, Mr. Pagliuca (representing the defense), and Ms. Comey participate in the dialogue, clarifying procedural matters related to the trial.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013554.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge about the government's plan to present documents to the jury without a testifying witness. The Court expresses concerns about the method, and Mr. Pagliuca formally objects to the proposed process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search