Trove
Sign In Sign Up

GOVERNMENT

Organization
Mentions
2805
Relationships
178
Events
870
Documents
1344
Also known as:
Government of Australia Government of the Republic of Cyprus United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Office of Government Relations PRC Government US Government (The Americans) Government Exhibit Office of Government Information Services Government / USA Orban Government Palestinian government IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE) Hamas Government Saudi Arabian government Orange County, California (Government) Netanyahu government British Government American government Pakistan Government/Military Canadian Government Australian government Government of Ecuador New Zealand Government Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Gov't (Government) Government / DOJ American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals United States of America (Government) US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
178 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
15 Very Strong
29
View
organization Defense
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
21
View
person defendant
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
62
View
person Defense counsel
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
55
View
person Recipient
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Adversarial
11 Very Strong
10
View
person MAXWELL
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
14
View
person the defendant
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person THOMAS
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
21
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
7
View
person defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
24
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization Defense
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Thomas
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
7
2
View
person Minor Victims
Protective
7
2
View
person Epstein's counsel
Professional
7
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... N/A View
N/A N/A Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... N/A View
N/A N/A Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... N/A View
N/A N/A Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. N/A View
N/A N/A Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... N/A View
N/A N/A Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. Court View
N/A N/A Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. N/A View
N/A N/A Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. Court View
N/A N/A Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. N/A View
N/A N/A Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... N/A View
N/A N/A NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims N/A View
N/A N/A Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. New York and Virgin Islands View
N/A N/A Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... N/A View
N/A N/A Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. N/A View
N/A N/A Indictment of Thomas S.D.N.Y. View
N/A N/A Opening of Grand Jury Investigation Unknown View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Planned resolution of pending redaction issues N/A View
N/A N/A Victims' lawsuit against the government Court View
N/A N/A Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. Court View

DOJ-OGR-00013553.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Ms. Moe, and the judge. Ms. Moe is requesting to present exhibits to the jury in a streamlined fashion without a witness, arguing it would be more efficient. The judge questions this unusual procedure, suggesting it could be handled during closing arguments and noting its difference from other methods.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013540.jpg

This document is an index of examination from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses Janine Gill Velez, Shawn, Nicole Hesse, and David Rodgers by various attorneys, providing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript. The document also includes a list of government exhibits that were received into evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013539.jpg

This document is a short excerpt from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, the judge discusses the briefing schedule with two individuals, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell, before adjourning the court. The session is formally adjourned until 8:45 a.m. on December 9, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013505.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the case number). The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of Eva Dubin, her marriage to Glenn Dubin, and flights taken with her children, Selena and Jordan. Notably, the testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was Selena Dubin's godfather.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013485.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers. The questioning focuses on an unnamed assistant of Epstein, confirming she traveled frequently with him, shared a romantic relationship, and had the same first name as another individual known as 'Jane'. The witness clarifies that despite the shared name, the assistant and Jane are two different people.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013474.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on establishing that Rodgers flew an unnamed male to Interlochen, Michigan, on seven separate occasions between 1991 and 1997. The trips were typically in August for the purpose of watching end-of-the-year performances.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013438.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. Attorney Ms. Comey requests that the jury be directed to Government Exhibit 14, specifically to a child's name and date of birth entry. After receiving no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell and approval from the court, Ms. Comey concludes her direct examination of the witness, Rodgers.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013409.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details a discussion between the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding a specific jury instruction for a witness named Rodgers. The Judge agrees to instruct the jury that alleged physical contact between the witness, Epstein, and Maxwell in New Mexico was not 'illegal sexual activity,' and the parties agree to discuss a separate 'Rule 412' issue at sidebar.

Court transcript (trial proceedings)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013406.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the Judge ('The Court') and Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 52' and whether the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The Judge notes a potential misunderstanding about the defense's opportunity to cross-examine, while Ms. Comey asserts that extensive examination and voir dire of Mr. Alessi occurred.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013400.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers testifies about the procedures for logging passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's airplanes, explaining that unknown passengers were recorded as 'PAX' (an abbreviation for passenger) in the logbook. Rodgers confirms that if a passenger's name was learned on a subsequent flight, their name would not be retroactively added to previous flight logs where they were listed as 'PAX'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013386.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript featuring a sidebar discussion during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues that evidence of Maxwell's father's death and her subsequent financial decline—followed by Epstein buying her a townhouse—establishes a financial motive for her participation in Epstein's crimes. The defense (Mr. Everdell) objects, claiming the events occurred three years before the alleged conspiracy and are irrelevant.

Court transcript (sidebar conference)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013367.jpg

This page is a transcript from a court trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Witness Mrs. Carolyn Hesse is under direct examination by Ms. Moe regarding 'Government Exhibit 2T.' The testimony focuses on identifying a message on the upper right-hand corner of the exhibit that is addressed 'for Mr. Epstein.'

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013364.jpg

This document is a partial court transcript from August 10, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, focusing on a discussion about 'Government Exhibit 1B'. Ms. Moe requests the jury to access the exhibit and clarifies its location in binders, then proceeds to question Mrs. Hesse about it. A key point is Ms. Moe's caution about not reading names aloud from the exhibit, suggesting sensitive information.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013362.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and a government lawyer (Ms. Moe) about admitting evidence, specifically 'message books' and 'Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3'. The judge overrules an objection and agrees to admit the evidence, after which the witness, Mrs. Hesse, is dismissed from the stand.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013356.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, concerning the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. The text details a legal discussion between attorney Ms. Moe and the Court regarding the admissibility and formatting of message exhibits, followed by a recess. After the recess, Ms. Moe highlights Government Exhibit 606, a household manual, specifically quoting instructions on page 7 regarding how employees should record phone messages.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013343.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Mrs. Hesse by Ms. Moe. Hesse identifies a photo of Ghislaine Maxwell and describes the Palm Beach property in detail (white, two-story, on the water, guest house). She testifies that Maxwell gave her work directions and outlines her responsibilities, which included coordinating maintenance and letting the housekeeper in.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013341.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the beginning of testimony from a witness named Nicole Hesse. After being sworn in, Ms. Hesse states her name for the record and answers preliminary questions from an attorney, Ms. Moe, establishing her birthplace as West Palm Beach, Florida, and that she grew up in North Palm Beach.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013330.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument between Ms. Moe and the Court over the admissibility of testimony from a witness named Amanda. Ms. Moe presents the testimony as corroborative evidence, but the Court questions its validity, noting it could violate a prior order and that its relevance hinges on the witness's age. The Court ultimately sustains an objection, referencing testimony from the previous day that the witness believed she was 17.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013327.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn identifies two former girlfriends, Melissa and Amanda Lazlo, and confirms he dated them concurrently with a woman named Carolyn. Crucially, Shawn testifies that Amanda Lazlo was 15 or 16 years old the first time he saw her go to Jeffrey Epstein's house, and identifies Melissa's name in an exhibit listed under 'child name'.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013315.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Shawn, filed on August 10, 2022. Shawn testifies about a past romantic relationship with a woman named Carolyn, stating they dated for four to five years, beginning when she was 14 and he was 17. He also reveals that during this time, Carolyn was employed by Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013313.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It depicts the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Shawn identifies Government Exhibit 20 as a copy of his ID, and the defense attorney Ms. Sternheim voices no objection to the exhibit.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013300.jpg

This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Court and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach discuss the admissibility of government exhibits linking Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) to Mar-a-Lago through her father, Sky Roberts. The prosecution argues that Sky Roberts' employment records at Mar-a-Lago corroborate testimony that Maxwell met Virginia Roberts there.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013299.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal discussion about the admissibility of a piece of evidence, Government Exhibit 761. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to the admission of the 'financial guarantor piece' of the exhibit, which suggests Mr. Epstein provided financial assistance, arguing the school in question did not rely on it. The judge clarifies that the relevance lies in the indication of assistance itself, leading to a discussion about providing a limiting instruction to the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013285.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where the Court discusses a proposed limiting instruction for the jury. The instruction clarifies that testimony from a witness about alleged sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein in New Mexico is not considered 'illegal sexual activity' as charged by the government in the indictment. The Court also references a prior November 23rd conference where the defense agreed with the instruction, and notes complications related to New Mexico law.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search