Trove
Sign In Sign Up

GOVERNMENT

Organization
Mentions
2805
Relationships
178
Events
870
Documents
1344
Also known as:
Government of Australia Government of the Republic of Cyprus United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Office of Government Relations PRC Government US Government (The Americans) Government Exhibit Office of Government Information Services Government / USA Orban Government Palestinian government IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE) Hamas Government Saudi Arabian government Orange County, California (Government) Netanyahu government British Government American government Pakistan Government/Military Canadian Government Australian government Government of Ecuador New Zealand Government Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Gov't (Government) Government / DOJ American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals United States of America (Government) US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
178 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
15 Very Strong
29
View
organization Defense
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
21
View
person defendant
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
62
View
person Defense counsel
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
55
View
person Recipient
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Adversarial
11 Very Strong
10
View
person MAXWELL
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
14
View
person the defendant
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person THOMAS
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
21
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
7
View
person defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
24
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization Defense
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Thomas
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
7
2
View
person Minor Victims
Protective
7
2
View
person Epstein's counsel
Professional
7
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... N/A View
N/A N/A Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... N/A View
N/A N/A Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... N/A View
N/A N/A Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. N/A View
N/A N/A Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... N/A View
N/A N/A Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. Court View
N/A N/A Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. N/A View
N/A N/A Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. Court View
N/A N/A Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. N/A View
N/A N/A Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... N/A View
N/A N/A NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims N/A View
N/A N/A Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. New York and Virgin Islands View
N/A N/A Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... N/A View
N/A N/A Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. N/A View
N/A N/A Indictment of Thomas S.D.N.Y. View
N/A N/A Opening of Grand Jury Investigation Unknown View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Planned resolution of pending redaction issues N/A View
N/A N/A Victims' lawsuit against the government Court View
N/A N/A Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. Court View

DOJ-OGR-00004774.jpg

This document is a court transcript from June 15, 2021, detailing the conclusion of a sentencing hearing for the defendant, Ms. Days. The judge imposes a sentence of 60 months, confirms that Ms. Days has waived her right to appeal, and dismisses all remaining open counts against her. The transcript also notes that the defendant waived her right to be physically present for the sentencing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004773.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 15, 2021. In it, a judge questions the defendant, Ms. Days, to ensure she understands the terms of her plea agreement, specifically a clause waiving her right to appeal if her sentence is 78 months or less. The judge confirms that her attorney, Mr. Donaldson, explained this waiver to her before she signed the agreement.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004740.jpg

This page from a court order addresses two requests by the defendant, Maxwell. The court denies Request 9 regarding forensic analysis of a journal, deeming the arguments speculative and improper for a Rule 17(c) subpoena, and denies Request 10 for a pair of boots as moot because the government has already agreed to make them available for inspection.

Legal court order/opinion page
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004732.jpg

This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against the defense's motion for early disclosure of impeachment material related to a witness, Minor Victim-4. The Government contends that Minor Victim-4's prior consistent statement from a deposition, made over a decade before the defendant's 2020 indictment, confirms the defendant's role in scheduling her massages with Epstein, thereby undermining the defense's claim of recent fabrication. The Government affirms its intent to provide this material ten days before trial, in line with customary practice.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004730.jpg

This legal document, filed on May 25, 2021, details the discovery provided by the Government to the defense in a case involving Epstein and Minor Victim-4. The evidence includes seized message pads, phone records, Federal Express shipment records, and flight records related to Epstein, his employees, and Minor Victim-4, all pertaining to charges in Counts Five and Six. The document indicates that further details about abuse and interactions will come from witness testimony, focusing on approximate timeframes due to the events occurring over a decade ago.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004728.jpg

This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's motion for a bill of particulars. The government contends that the S2 Indictment provides sufficient detail for the defendant to prepare a defense for Counts Five and Six, which relate to her alleged participation in a conspiracy with Epstein to commit sex trafficking of minors. Specifically, the charges involve the trafficking of 'Minor Victim-4' between approximately 2001 and 2004.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014715.jpg

This document is the final page of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim, that there are no further matters to discuss. The court is then formally adjourned until 9:00 a.m. on December 28, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014697.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case dated August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding a note from the jury. The jury is asking if a defendant can be found guilty solely for aiding and abetting a return flight from New Mexico, considered separately from the initial flight to New Mexico. Mr. Everdell argues that the answer should be 'no' based on the court's instructions that the travel must have a 'significant or motivating purpose'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014657.jpg

This document is the final page of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It records the conclusion of a day's proceedings, where the judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim, that there are no further matters. The court is then adjourned until 9:00 a.m. on December 21, 2021.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014655.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between the judge and counsel while the jury is not present. Counsel (Ms. Menninger) requests a juror seating chart, which the court agrees to provide. The judge praises the counsel for their professionalism, then reads a note from the jury stating they are leaving for the day at 5:30 and will resume deliberations in the morning.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014640.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the admissibility and limited use of 'similar acts' evidence. The judge instructs the jury that such evidence cannot be used to prove bad character, but may be used to determine intent, lack of mistake, or the existence of a common scheme or plan.

Court transcript (jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014628.jpg

This legal document is a jury charge from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It instructs the jury on the concept of "conscious avoidance" or "willful blindness," explaining that if a defendant deliberately avoids confirming a high probability of criminal activity, this avoidance can be legally considered the equivalent of actual knowledge. This instruction is provided to guide the jury's deliberations, particularly concerning conspiracy counts against the defendant.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014622.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, details overt acts from an indictment related to conspiracy charges. It alleges that between 1994 and 2002, Maxwell, along with co-conspirator Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse and trafficking of minors identified as Jane, Annie, and Carolyn. The alleged acts occurred in New York, Florida, and New Mexico.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014603.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript detailing jury instructions for 'Count Four' in the case against Ms. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The instruction explains that the government must prove Ms. Maxwell knowingly transported a minor named 'Jane' across state lines with the intent for her to engage in illegal sexual activity violating New York Penal Law. The document clarifies that this illegal intent did not need to be Ms. Maxwell's sole purpose for the transportation.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014591.jpg

This document is a portion of a legal instruction, likely for a jury, from the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It clarifies that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, is presumed innocent and does not bear the burden of proving her innocence; instead, the government must prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for each charge. The document also provides a detailed definition of 'reasonable doubt,' emphasizing it must be based on reason and evidence, not speculation or sympathy.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014588.jpg

This document is a page from a jury charge in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. A judge is instructing the jury on how to properly interpret courtroom proceedings, specifically warning them not to draw inferences from lawyers' objections, the judge's rulings, or sidebar discussions. The judge emphasizes that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that they are the sole determiners of fact.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014561.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge and several attorneys regarding the final preparations for trial exhibits. The counsel confirms that the exhibits have been reviewed by both the defense and the government and are ready for the jury. The judge provides instructions to mark the finalized list as a Court Exhibit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014553.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a portion of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for a Ms. Maxwell. Menninger explains the legal standard of "reasonable doubt" to the jury, urging them to consider not just the evidence presented but also the lack of evidence, and to acquit her client if they would hesitate to make an important personal decision based on the quality of information provided by the government.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014552.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court proceeding, specifically a summation by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense. She is instructing the jury that the burden of proof lies entirely with the government to prove every element of the charges against her client, Ms. Maxwell, beyond a reasonable doubt. Ms. Menninger emphasizes that if the government fails to meet this high standard on any part of any charge, the jury must acquit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011771.jpg

This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 741), filed on August 10, 2022. It indexes the direct examination of witness Lawrence Visoski (Jeffrey Epstein's longtime pilot) by Ms. Comey. It also lists the admission of several Government Exhibits (Nos. 112, 115, 111, 202, 212, 932, 704) and the corresponding page numbers in the transcript.

Court transcript index / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011758.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. During a direct examination by attorney Ms. Comey, a witness named Mr. Visoski identifies Government Exhibits 932 and 704 as fair and accurate photos of Mr. Epstein's brownstone residence at 9 East 71st Street in New York. With no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibits into evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011746.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. During the direct examination by attorney Ms. Comey, a witness named Mr. Visoski identifies Ghislaine Maxwell in two separate government exhibits, 115 and 111. The exhibits are subsequently admitted into evidence by the court without objection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011727.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, likely a defense attorney. Sternheim argues that a key witness is an unreliable, professional actress who only implicated "Ghislaine" after Epstein's death in order to receive a $5 million payment from the Epstein victim's fund. The attorney urges the jury to be skeptical of the upcoming testimony, highlighting alleged financial motivations and inconsistencies.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005816.jpg

This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, discusses the admissibility of expert testimony from Dr. Rocchio. The Government intends to use this testimony to provide background on victim behavior, specifically why victims might return to their abusers like the defendant and Epstein. The document also references an October 11, 2021 letter where the Government notified the defense about specific evidence and witness testimony it plans to present at trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005806.jpg

This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a motion arguing for the admissibility of expert testimony from a Dr. Rocchio in an upcoming trial. The Government intends for Dr. Rocchio to testify on how relationships involving trust and attachment can prevent victims, particularly minors, from recognizing or disclosing abuse until later in life. The document asserts that this testimony is reliable, relevant, and necessary to help the jury understand witness testimony.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search