Comey
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Drescher
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court break | The court calls for a mid-afternoon break of about 15 minutes. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Recess | A recess is taken during the court proceedings. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding the contents... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of Juan Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Court appearance/hearing | Court | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court Cross-Examination in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Courtroom | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033445.jpg
An email exchange between Larry Summers and an individual identified as 'J' discussing relationship dynamics described metaphorically as a 'game.' They debate the appropriateness of sending written notes versus face-to-face communication, with references to an 'exit strategy' and a potential meeting in Beijing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033406.jpg
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation involves J giving Summers advice on a conflict or negotiation with an unnamed woman, advising him that sending a written note instead of meeting face-to-face is 'bad form' and comparing it to 'Trump firing Comey.' Summers attempts to defend written communication as showing 'seriousness of thought,' but J insists on face-to-face interaction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.jpg
This document is an email chain from May 11, 2017, between 'jeffrey E.' (using jeevacation@gmail.com, likely Jeffrey Epstein) and 'Thomas Jr., Landon'. The correspondence references 'your man Jes', the reaction of 'Trump contacts' to the firing of 'Comey', and includes Landon's warning that communicating via a 'random gmail email, that is not smart!'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030358.jpg
This document is an email chain from May 11, 2017, between Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), marked as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030358'. Thomas asks Epstein about "your man Jes?" and how Epstein's "Trump contacts" are responding to the recent firing of FBI Director James Comey. Epstein expresses a desire to speak on the phone rather than by email, stating it is "not for email," and later comments, "everyone gets their turn in the barrel."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030351.jpg
This document is an email chain from May 11, 2017, between Thomas Jr., Landon and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). Landon asks Epstein about 'your man Jes' and how Epstein's 'Trump contacts' are reacting to 'Comey'. The exchange also includes a cryptic remark from Epstein ('everyone gets their turn in the barrel') and a criticism from Landon about Epstein using a 'random gmail email'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028333.jpg
This document, an apparent news article or summary from around September 2018, analyzes the intense speculation and conflicting reports about whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had resigned or was about to be fired by President Trump. The chaos reportedly stemmed from news that Rosenstein had previously suggested recording Trump, with the article noting that Rosenstein's job status remained uncertain pending a scheduled meeting with the President.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028332.jpg
This document is a news article, marked as a House Oversight committee exhibit, concerning a New York Times report on Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The report alleged that in May 2017, Rosenstein suggested secretly recording President Trump and invoking the 25th Amendment, claims which reporter Michael Schmidt later defended as serious and documented in memos by then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe. The article places these allegations in the context of the Mueller investigation and recent developments involving Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026463.jpg
This document is an email chain from December 2, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (from 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Larry Summers. The conversation, with the subject 'Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?', begins with cryptic messages about an 'easter egg hunt' involving 'your friend andrew'. It concludes with a lengthy, high-importance email from Epstein analyzing the constitutional authority of President Trump in comparison to past presidents like Bush and Nixon, with references to Comey and the Flynn investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026252.jpg
This document is a page from a U.S. House of Representatives oversight report detailing alleged misconduct by the FBI and DOJ regarding the Steele dossier. It claims officials concealed the dossier's unverified nature, the anti-Trump bias of its author, and related conflicts of interest from the FISC when obtaining a surveillance warrant. This document is related to the 2016 election investigation and contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
Direct examination of Mr. Rodgers regarding passenger 'Jane'
An attorney questions witness Mr. Rodgers about his first meeting with a passenger named 'Jane' on November 11, 1996, who she flew with (Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell), and the number of times he saw her on Epstein's planes. The questioning then directs the witness to Government Exhibit 662.
Responsiveness of testimony to a jury note
Attorneys Pagliuca and Comey debate whether Special Agent Jason Richards' testimony should be added to the court's response to a jury note concerning the cross-examination of Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request.
Jury instruction regarding witness testimony
A discussion between the judge and two attorneys (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Comey) about whether to give the jury a limiting instruction regarding the testimony of a witness named Annie, and how that testimony applies to different counts in an indictment.
Admissibility of new arguments post-testimony
A discussion between the judge and attorneys about whether a new issue can be raised that was not brought up during a witness examination. The judge explains their reasoning for not admitting something following Mr. Alessi's testimony and states they remain open to arguments.
Carolyn's introduction to Virginia and Jeffrey Epstein
This is a transcript of a direct examination where a witness named Carolyn is questioned about her relationship with Virginia, whom she met at age 14. The questioning covers their social group and activities, and how Virginia first approached Carolyn with an opportunity to make money, which is linked to the first mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
Procedural matters in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
A discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding the status of witnesses, a potential government rebuttal expert, and an affidavit from Mr. Hamilton.
Proposed redactions to letter briefing
A letter regarding proposed redactions to a letter briefing.
Opposition to Dkt 43
Government opposition to defense motion.
Response in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell
Response regarding Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion dated August 17, 2020.
Opposition to Letter Motion re: Exceeding Page Limit
A letter response in opposition to Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's letter motion of August 17, 2020.
Proposed redactions to letter briefing
A letter regarding proposed redactions in response to the Court's Order of August 18, 2020.
Opposition to Letter Motion re: Request for Permission to...
A letter response in opposition to the motion filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on 08/17/2020.
Proposed redactions to letter briefing
A letter from the USA regarding proposed redactions to a letter briefing.
Opposition to Letter Motion 43
A letter response in opposition to Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's letter motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity