| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-28 | File transfer | The FBI was ordered to deliver the full and complete Epstein files to the AG's office by 8:00 a.m. | AG's office | View |
| 2024-06-25 | N/A | Judge Gardephe grants the FBI's motion for summary judgment and denies Radar Online's cross-motion. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2023-04-17 | N/A | Deadline for FBI to provide results of factual accuracy and sensitivity review of the draft report. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-13 | N/A | Defense counsel reviewed hard drives at the FBI office. | Denver, CO | View |
| 2021-10-06 | N/A | Background check coordination for potential witnesses in the 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) case. | New York | View |
| 2021-10-06 | N/A | Coordination of evidence/discovery materials ('3500 folders') and transfer of a manifest file bet... | New York (Digital Correspon... | View |
| 2021-10-06 | N/A | Generation of Additional Inquiry Response / Criminal History Record | Albany, New York | View |
| 2021-10-06 | N/A | Production of Criminal History Record (Rap Sheet) in response to a request from the State of Florida | New York | View |
| 2021-10-06 | N/A | Generation of an Additional Inquiry Response regarding an III (Interstate Identification Index) s... | Albany, New York | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Evidence Gathering / Discovery Production | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-04 | N/A | Pre-trial preparation for 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) case involving background checks on potential ... | New York | View |
| 2021-10-03 | N/A | Request for Epstein/Maxwell tipline spreadsheets for '3500' production (Jencks Act material). | New York | View |
| 2021-10-01 | N/A | Evidence transfer to FBI | Unknown | View |
| 2021-08-19 | N/A | Circulation of a Draft FD-302 report regarding a proffer interview. | New York | View |
| 2021-07-20 | N/A | Last Inventory of Evidence | NY - New York | View |
| 2021-06-29 | N/A | Seizure of Annie Farmer's boots by the FBI. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-05-18 | N/A | Proposed date for defendant to review highly confidential images at 500 Pearl Street. | 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Scheduled start of daily evidence review with Ghislaine Maxwell present. | 500 Pearl Street, NY | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Evidence Review | 500 Pearl Street, New York ... | View |
| 2021-04-12 | N/A | Proposed timeframe for physical evidence review at 500 Pearl Street. | 500 Pearl Street, NY | View |
| 2021-04-08 | N/A | Document print date / recent chain of custody entry | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-08 | N/A | Evidence returned to storage. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-06 | N/A | VHS Conversion/Duplication | FBI Lab/Office | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | FBI brought a CD containing additional files for Maxwell review to the USANYS office. | USANYS Office, 4th Floor | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | FBI brought a CD containing additional files for Maxwell review to the sender. | Sender's Office | View |
This document, dated February 28, 2023, appears to be a legal filing summarizing trial testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights inconsistencies between trial testimony and pre-trial statements made by accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn' regarding Maxwell's presence and involvement in sexual abuse. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in 2007 FBI interviews or a 2008 lawsuit, despite implicating her at trial.
This document is a juror questionnaire, identified as Juror ID 50, from a legal case filed on March 9, 2022. The juror denies that they or any close relations have ever been the subject of an investigation, a victim of a crime, or a party to a legal dispute with the United States government or its agencies, including the FBI and NYPD.
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
This document is a page from a court order in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (part of appeal record Case 22-1426). The Judge denies Maxwell's motion to compel the immediate disclosure of prior statements by 'Minor Victim-4' in which the victim allegedly did not mention Maxwell. The Court rules that the Government's deadline of October 11, 2021, for Jencks Act and Giglio material is sufficient and that the Government understands its Brady obligations regarding exculpatory evidence.
This legal document is a court ruling on requests made by a party named Maxwell for the immediate disclosure of specific materials from the Government. The requested items include witness interviews, FBI reports, diary pages, and subpoenas. The Court denies Maxwell's requests, reasoning that the Government has affirmed its compliance with its disclosure obligations (under Brady and Giglio), some materials are protected by the Jencks Act, some are not in the Government's possession, and other requests are overly broad.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. The questioning establishes that the witness received phone calls from Epstein and Sarah Kellen, with Kellen identifying herself as calling on Epstein's behalf. The transcript also details the witness's initial contacts with the government regarding the case, including a meeting in a Florida parking lot around January 4, 2021, and a subsequent phone or video meeting on January 13, 2021.
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 8, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present from agencies like the FBI and NYPD.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) covering the redirect examination of a witness named Carolyn. During this segment, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca finishes his questioning regarding a photo exhibit (C10), after which prosecutor Ms. Comey questions Carolyn about the authorship of her civil complaint and her application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, to which Carolyn admits she did not write them herself. The page concludes with a question regarding an FBI interview report.
This document is a court transcript page from a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Carolyn's communications with the FBI and the government in 2019, following an initial meeting with agents in 2007. The questioner probes whether her lawyer, Mr. Scarola, forwarded emails from the government to her, with Carolyn initially stating she does not recall but later affirming she does recall getting forwarded emails.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on establishing that in previous interactions—including 2007 FBI interviews, two lawsuits involving Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and a 2009 deposition—the witness never mentioned Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney also attempts to refresh the witness's memory regarding a government meeting in Florida in 2007 with a Ms. Villaflana, whom the witness does not recall.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning, led by Mr. Pagliuca, focuses on the timeline of the witness's interactions with the FBI in 2007 and her subsequent filing of two civil complaints in 2008 with the assistance of her lawyer, Richard Willits. The document ends with the attorney directing the witness to a specific prior deposition for review.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies between the witness's current memory and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding who called her about 'Incubus tickets' (Sarah or Epstein). The questioning also establishes that Sarah called the witness to convey that Epstein wanted to take photographs of her.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a 2007 interview Carolyn had with the FBI, establishing that she discussed individuals like Sarah, Epstein, and Virginia Roberts, but never mentioned Ghislaine Maxwell. Carolyn testifies that Maxwell was not mentioned because she was not the subject of the FBI's inquiry at that time.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca questions Carolyn about a statement she made to the FBI in 2007 concerning an incident in a kitchen with a chef, which she confirms. He then asks about a separate visit where a person named Sarah allegedly led her upstairs, which Carolyn denies.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning attempts to refresh Carolyn's memory about a prior statement she allegedly made to the FBI in 2007 concerning a chef. Carolyn disputes the attorney's characterization of the statement, claiming the document she was shown mentioned her taking off her panties for $400 but did not mention a chef.
This is a page from a court transcript documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a 2007 statement to the FBI regarding a phone call allegedly returned by Jeffrey Epstein and the details of a subsequent visit to his property where her boyfriend, Sean, drove her.
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony covers Carolyn's 2007 statements to the FBI, confirming she received $300 from Epstein and left his house with Ms. Roberts. The questioning focuses on discrepancies regarding how she obtained Epstein's phone number and the specifics of a phone call she made to 'Sarah' to schedule a massage, noting that someone from Epstein's house (not Epstein himself) returned the call.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony details a past encounter involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts (noted as being 18 at the time). The witness confirms statements made to the FBI in 2007 regarding Epstein ordering her to undress and Virginia Roberts having sex with Epstein in her presence.
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony covers a 2007 statement Carolyn gave to the FBI regarding an unidentified older woman, and details a specific incident at Epstein's house where Ms. Roberts (Virginia Roberts Giuffre) led Carolyn upstairs and instructed her to massage Epstein's legs while Roberts massaged his back.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a 2007 FBI interview conducted at Carolyn's home, specifically confirming her statement that she saw an older lady with short black hair and an unknown accent at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The witness confirms the details of the FBI visit, noting she was not expecting them but that they were not rude.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony covers a 2002 visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house with Virginia Roberts, where the witness recalls seeing an older woman with shoulder-length black hair and an accent. It also confirms the witness was interviewed by FBI Special Agents Nesbitt and Kuyrkendall at her home in August 2007.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies about being instructed by both a "Ms. Roberts" and a "Virginia" to lie about her age and say she was 17 to Epstein. The testimony also confirms that Ms. Roberts, a friend of Epstein, invited Carolyn to Epstein's house to give him a massage for which she would be paid.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding statements she made to the FBI in August 2007. The questioning focuses on whether 'Ms. Roberts' (Virginia) told Carolyn she could make $300 by massaging a man (Epstein) in Palm Beach; Carolyn denies being told this initially, stating she was told only upon arriving at Mr. Epstein's house.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn is being cross-examined by Mr. Pagliuca regarding a 2007 statement she gave to the FBI. The attorney reads a portion of a report stating Virginia approached Carolyn at a party to offer her $300; Carolyn corrects the record, stating the FBI got it wrong and the interaction actually occurred at Virginia's house, not a party.
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the case number and attorneys) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness denies using drugs or alcohol and denies an allegation that Virginia Roberts approached her at a party to offer her $300. The witness confirms she was interviewed by the FBI in 2007 regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity