FBI

Organization
Mentions
5131
Relationships
326
Events
710
Documents
2372
Also known as:
FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) FBI National Academy FBI Human Resources FBI Tampa FBI Albuquerque FBI San Juan FBI ICRC Winchester VA FBI Miami Field Office FBI New York Division FBI Criminal Investigative Division FBI New York FBI ICRC FBI C-20 FBI Counter Terrorism Task Force FBI Jacksonville FBI Lab FBI Jacksonville Field Office FBI Newark FBI Jacksonville Division FBI Evidence Response Team FBINET FBI NY FBI CART FBI Richmond Division FBI-New York FBI Victim Services Division FBI Victim Services NY FBI FBINY (FBI New York) FBI Baltimore/Delaware Seattle FBI FBINY FBI-Miami Office FBI/DOJ FBI Boston FBI-NY FBI-NY Sex Crimes Squad FBI (implied by mention of '302s') NY FBI (New York Field Office) FBI Los Angeles Federal Bureau of Intelligence (FBI) FBINET (FBI Network) DO (likely Director's Office or similar FBI division) FBI - New York Office FBI (Implied by 'Agent') Bureau (FBI) FBI - New York City FBI HQ FBI (implied by reference to '302') DOJ/FBI FBIHQ/CID FBI NY EC4 FBI (implied by reference to '302s') NYO (FBI New York Office) FBI (implied by case file format) FBI Denver Division FBI / Federal Agents FBI (Implied by reference to 'SA' - Special Agent, or internal office agents) FBI Victim Assistance FBIHQ FBI New York Office (NYO) FBI Denver Office FBI Atlanta Division FBI Victim Services program FBI Headquarters FBI New York (FBINY) FBI NY ECU FBI NY CART (Computer Analysis and Response Team) Inspection Division (FBI) FBI NY CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) FBI's FBI, New York

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
326 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization NYPD
Joint task force
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Investigation subject
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Subject of investigation
10 Very Strong
6
View
person NSA
Business associate
9 Strong
3
View
person PBPD / PBSO
Inter agency cooperation
9 Strong
2
View
person Witness's stepmom
Interviewee interviewer
9 Strong
1
View
person A. Farmer
Witness investigator
7
3
View
person A. Farmer
Investigative
7
3
View
person CAROLYN
Witness investigator
7
3
View
person Michael Horowitz
Oversight investigated entity
7
1
View
person Christopher Steele
Source terminated
7
1
View
person Epstein
Subject of investigation
6
2
View
location USANYS
Legal representative
6
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Informant
6
2
View
organization SDNY
Collaboration
6
6
View
organization [REDACTED]
Investigative subject witness
6
2
View
organization MIA
Professional bureaucratic
6
1
View
person [REDACTED Interviewee]
Investigative subject witness
6
2
View
person defendant
Adversarial
6
1
View
organization MIA
Inter agency cooperation
6
2
View
person Amanda Young
Employment
6
2
View
organization USAO
Inter agency professional
6
1
View
person A. Farmer
Informant interviewee
6
1
View
person Annie Farmer
Investigative informant
6
1
View
person Dr. Loftus
Professional
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Interview An interview of Rodgers conducted by the FBI. The document states it was 'roughly almost 15 years... N/A View
N/A Investigation The FBI was conducting an investigation and monitoring Ghislaine Maxwell's location. N/A View
N/A Consultation Dr. Loftus consulted with the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Secret Service. N/A View
N/A Seizure of evidence CDs containing photographs were seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence and subsequently reviewed... Jeffrey Epstein's residence View
N/A Search and seizure The FBI conducted a search of a residence and seized hard drives that were found in boxes sealed ... a residence View
N/A Investigation The DOJ and FBI conducted an exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epst... N/A View
N/A N/A Police Chief Reiter refers matter to FBI. Palm Beach/Miami View
N/A N/A FBI attempted to interview Sarnoff's 'source' regarding allegations, but the source did not appear. Unknown View
N/A N/A Seizure of 3 devices from Epstein's NY residence. Epstein's NY Residence View
N/A N/A FBI conducts background checks on George and visits his neighbors. George's neighborhood View
N/A N/A FBI Interview of a white female Not specified View
N/A N/A Operation Leap Year task force formed. Florida View
N/A N/A FBI investigation finding photos of Virginia at Epstein's Palm Beach house. Palm Beach house View
N/A N/A FBI provided more than 190,000 services to victims. USA/Global View
N/A N/A FBI search/raid of the property. Epstein Residence View
N/A N/A Sting operation against Alfredo Rodriguez for selling the stolen book. South Florida View
N/A N/A Political Convention and Protests Convention Center area View
N/A N/A FBI investigation reached a 'fork in the road' regarding whether Snowden acted alone or had help. USA View
N/A Legal action Execution of a search warrant for one of Epstein's devices. N/A View
N/A N/A FBI busted Rodriguez for attempting to sell the black book. Unknown View
N/A N/A FBI Investigation The Center View
N/A N/A FBI investigation determined allegations of abuse against Epstein were credible. Unknown View
N/A N/A FBI investigation reached a 'fork in the road' regarding whether Snowden acted alone or had help;... USA View
N/A N/A Law enforcement investigation initiation Licata's home View
N/A N/A FBI case closure Unknown View

DOJ-OGR-00016286.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). She testifies about the psychological impact of wearing specific boots to reclaim a 'dark memory' of being taken advantage of by Maxwell and Epstein. She also details her history of speaking with the FBI (2006/2007) and the media (2016 off-record, 2019 on-record), confirming she was not paid for these interviews.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016285.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. The witness confirms speaking to the media in 2002 and being interviewed by the FBI in late 2006 or early 2007 regarding her experiences. She testifies that she told the FBI that Ghislaine Maxwell gave her a massage and that Jeffrey Epstein got into bed with her.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg

Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.

Court transcript cover page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016177.jpg

This document is a transcript of an opening statement, likely from a defense attorney named Ms. Sternheim. She argues that an accuser, Carolyn, fabricated her story about Ghislaine's involvement, noting that Carolyn's initial lawsuits and FBI interview only mentioned Epstein and his assistant, Sarah Kellen. The attorney suggests that Carolyn's story changed to include Ghislaine only after Epstein's death, motivated by a multi-million dollar payment from a victim's fund.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015149.jpg

This legal document describes the process of two separate grand jury proceedings related to indictments against an individual named Maxwell. It details that on June 29, 2020, and March 29, 2021, grand juries heard testimony from an FBI agent and an NYPD detective, respectively, who presented hearsay evidence summarizing the government's investigation. The document outlines the exhibits presented and the subsequent indictments returned by the juries.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015147.jpg

This document is page 15 of a legal filing dated August 11, 2025, discussing the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell based on 'special circumstances' and public interest in the Epstein investigation. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum regarding the Government's review of the investigation and notes that a separate court in the Southern District of Florida recently denied a similar motion on July 23, 2025.

Legal filing (court order/opinion)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002540.jpg

This legal document outlines the scope and methodology of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prompted by a February 21, 2019, court ruling that the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) violated victims' rights, the OPR's review examined government conduct, collected extensive records, and conducted over 60 interviews. The investigation identified five subjects, including former U.S. Attorney Acosta, for their roles in the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and related decisions.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002537.jpg

This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.

Court document / legal filing (exhibit)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg

This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on January 25, 2021. The defense argues that Perjury Counts should not be joined with Mann Act Counts because the alleged false statements occurred during 2016 civil depositions regarding a defamation suit (involving Virginia Giuffre) and were not made to the FBI or a grand jury to thwart an existing investigation. The text references a purported conspiracy between Maxwell and Epstein from 1999-2002.

Legal filing (court motion/memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002290(1).jpg

This document is page 12 of a defense filing (Document 120) from January 2021 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the 'joinder' (combining) of Perjury Counts with Mann Act Counts, stating that Maxwell's alleged false statements in 2016 civil depositions were tangential to the defamation case and not part of a 'common scheme' to obstruct the Mann Act investigation. The defense distinguishes this case from legal precedent (Potamitis), emphasizing that Maxwell did not lie to the FBI or a Grand Jury to derail an investigation.

Court filing / legal motion (defense argument)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002186.jpg

This document is a page from a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) opposing bail for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It details her evasion of FBI agents during her arrest, including fleeing and wrapping a phone in tin foil, and argues she prioritized private security over law enforcement. Additionally, it asserts she was deceptive with Pretrial Services regarding her finances, possessing 'vast resources' far exceeding the $3.8 million she initially disclosed.

Legal filing / court opinion (government opposition to bail)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002186(1).jpg

This legal document argues for the defendant's detention by highlighting her deceptive behavior and flight risk. It cites her knowing disobedience of FBI directives when she fled, her attempts to evade law enforcement by wrapping a phone in tin foil, and her significant dishonesty regarding her financial assets, which are believed to be far greater than the $3.8 million she disclosed to Pretrial Services.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002185(1).jpg

This document is page 24 of a Government filing (Document 100) in the case US v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 18, 2020. It argues against bail by highlighting the defendant's evasion of law enforcement, noting that her counsel never disclosed her location despite being in contact with the Government. It details that during her arrest, Maxwell ignored FBI directives and ran away from agents who were clearly identified.

Court filing (government opposition to bail application)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002072.jpg

This document is a statement from a forensic accountant and private investigator detailing their professional qualifications and extensive experience. The individual outlines their education, a 25-year career as a Special Agent with the IRS-CID from 1973 to 1998, and their work on complex financial fraud investigations in collaboration with the U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, and NYPD. The statement serves to establish the author's expertise and credibility in financial investigations.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002025.jpg

This legal document is a declaration from an unnamed individual defending Ghislaine against public accusations and media reports. The author attests that Ghislaine was not a fugitive but was forced into hiding due to a dangerous media frenzy, which included a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun newspaper, and threats on social media. The author asserts Ghislaine's consistent claims of innocence and her desire for a fair legal process to clear her name.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002002.jpg

This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was not attempting to evade arrest. It explains that her retreat to a safe room was a standard security protocol initiated after her guard mistook approaching FBI agents for the press. The document further contends that she wrapped a cellphone in tin foil to prevent press access after her number was leaked, not to evade law enforcement, citing that the phone was registered to her charity and that she used another, uncovered phone as her primary device.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001819.jpg

This legal document, filed on November 6, 2020, is a motion from the Government detailing a delay in producing discovery evidence from 62 electronic devices seized from Epstein. The Government explains that its outside vendor will not meet the November 9 deadline and will likely complete the work by November 19. The document outlines the subsequent unsuccessful negotiations with the defense for an extension, detailing the defense's four conditions and the Government's agreement to some (extending motion deadlines, providing a laptop) but rejection of others (providing names of minor victims and Jencks Act material).

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030480.jpg

This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. The letter argues against an aggravated assault charge in a specific case, contending that the facts do not align with the legal definition of a violent felony, as there was no suggestion of serious bodily harm or a deadly weapon. The argument is supported by legal citations, including Florida case law and the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, to demonstrate that a plea to aggravated assault would be inappropriate.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022167.jpg

This document is an official statement summarizing the FBI's conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019. This finding is supported by video evidence showing no one entered his cell tier overnight and is consistent with previous findings from the NYC Chief Medical Examiner, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the DOJ's Inspector General. The statement also provides links to the raw and enhanced video footage.

Official statement
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022086.jpg

This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a discovery request from a defendant named Thomas. The Government contends that it is not required to produce records from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) because the BOP was not part of the prosecution team or involved in a 'joint investigation'. The document distinguishes the roles of the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, DOJ-OIG) from the BOP, noting the Government obtained BOP records via subpoena and was not involved in the BOP's internal investigation into Epstein's suicide.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022085.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a brief or motion, dated April 24, 2020. It argues that the involvement of agents from a government agency in an investigation does not automatically make the entire agency part of the "prosecution team" for discovery purposes. The text cites several legal precedents (Stein, Pelullo, Locascio, Ghailani, and Middendorf) to outline the factors courts use to determine the scope of the prosecution team and its disclosure obligations under Rule 16.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022057.jpg

A printout of a Government Executive article dated November 19, 2019, filed as a court document. The article details testimony by BOP Director Hawk Sawyer regarding staffing shortages ('augmentation') and the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein suicide, including the indictment of two guards for falsifying records. Sawyer agrees with Senator Ted Cruz that the event was a 'black eye' for the agency but defends the majority of the staff.

Court filing (exhibit) / news article printout
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022053.jpg

This document, a printout of a news article dated March 31, 2020, discusses the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the Manhattan Correctional Center, including a DOJ investigation. It details the unsealing of court records from a lawsuit by accuser Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, which contained allegations against several high-profile individuals. The article also revisits the controversial 2008 'sweetheart' plea deal Epstein received from former U.S. attorney Alex Acosta in Florida.

News article printout
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg

A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.

News article / court exhibit
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity