FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Consulting workshops conducted by the witness. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alger Hiss Trial | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness interviewed by FBI agents regarding allegations. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein residences in NYC and USVI; seizure of devices and creation of database. | NYC, USVI | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein status meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Confiscation of original video by FBI | MCC | View |
| N/A | N/A | Use of VNS for victim notification | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meetings between witness Jane, the FBI, and the government. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Contact with Witness | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Creation of Merged Flight Manifests Chart | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview regarding the sexual exploitation of minors. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Interview of a white female regarding the sexual exploitation of minors. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of Epstein case from PBPD to FBI | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interviews with MCC employees regarding Epstein checks. | MCC | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Interview conducted pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation of ... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reiter referred the Epstein case to the FBI to check for federal violations. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reiter referred Epstein case to FBI for federal review. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Operation Leap Year | West Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of digital evidence (hard drive) from an office. | Unspecified office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Collection and review of digital evidence | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI production of a WANTED poster with a swastika. | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI briefing of House Intelligence Committee members regarding a top-secret intelligence source. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a white female subject pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual ... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Criminal investigation | The defendant was concerned about the prospect of a criminal investigation at the time of her dep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR conducted an extensive investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, reviewing documen... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017198.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court rebuttal on August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Ms. Comey, argues against the defense's claim that the FBI manipulated witnesses. She asserts there is no evidence for this accusation, citing testimony from witnesses like Special Agent Young, Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie, who all stated they were only asked to tell the truth. Ms. Comey concludes that for the defense's argument to hold, the jury would have to believe that all these witnesses lied about the defendant's role in their abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017196.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (rebuttal by Prosecutor Ms. Comey) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues against the defense theory that victims fabricated stories for financial gain, pointing out that victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie disclosed details about Maxwell to the FBI and personal confidants (Dave Mulligan, Matt, Sean) years before any compensation fund existed (specifically citing 2006 and 2007). The text details specific allegations, including Maxwell touching Annie's breasts during a massage and Carolyn identifying Maxwell by her hair and accent.
DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a rebuttal argument delivered by Ms. Comey on August 10, 2022. Comey refutes the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) were manipulated by greedy lawyers to fabricate a story about Maxwell for financial gain from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. She argues there is no evidence for this conspiracy and highlights that one witness's lawyer worked pro bono, which contradicts the alleged financial motive.
DOJ-OGR-00017168.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation in a court case, filed on August 10, 2022. The speaker argues that memory is a constructive and fallible process, using Annie Farmer's incorrect recollection of an April 1996 date as an example. The speaker also defends the credibility of an expert, Dr. Loftus, by stating she has consulted for the Department of Justice, FBI, and Secret Service, countering the implication that she is solely a defense witness.
DOJ-OGR-00017156.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript containing the closing argument (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that metadata presented by forensic expert Stephen Flatley does not prove Maxwell wrote specific incriminating documents, as flight logs show she was not in the location ('the house') where the desktop computer was located when those documents were created. The defense suggests multiple people had access to the computer.
DOJ-OGR-00017149.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that a witness named Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in her original 2007 FBI statement or in two 2008 civil lawsuits. The text details Carolyn's interactions with Epstein, Roberts, Kellen, and Sarah, highlighting that she originally attributed specific acts (like massage instruction) to Roberts rather than Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017148.jpg
This document is a page from the closing summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text challenges the credibility of a witness named 'Kate' using property records and then shifts focus to a witness named 'Carolyn.' It details Carolyn's 2007 interview with FBI agents Kuyrkendall and Richards, where she explicitly stated she was recruited by Virginia Roberts, who promised her money and brought her into a property where she saw a woman with an unknown accent.
DOJ-OGR-00017143.jpg
This document is a summation from a legal case, discussing inconsistencies and issues related to witness testimony and evidence. It questions the government's ability to corroborate stories, highlights missing diary entries from Annie Farmer, and details the interactions between various lawyers (Boies Schiller firm, Brad Edwards, Jack Scarola) and witnesses (Ms. Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Jane, Kate, Carolyn), suggesting potential 'contamination of memory' due to their communications with each other, family, and media. The document concludes by mentioning Annie Farmer's statement to the FBI regarding her story and a 'money piece' not being sexualized.
DOJ-OGR-00017134.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to discredit an unnamed female witness or victim. Menninger argues the woman's story is full of inconsistencies, citing discrepancies in her statements to the FBI about her housing, the timeline of meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, and her description of her family life. The speaker ultimately alleges that the woman is fabricating details, specifically inserting Ghislaine into her narrative under the influence of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman, to strengthen her case.
DOJ-OGR-00017128.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, specifically the summation by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger attacks the credibility of a witness's testimony, highlighting the witness's uncertainty about how many times Maxwell was present during alleged "orgies" orchestrated by Epstein. The summation also points out that other women allegedly present at these events, which involved a 14-year-old girl, did not report them to the police.
DOJ-OGR-00017125.jpg
This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The text focuses on attacking the credibility of a witness by highlighting a major inconsistency between her court testimony (claiming abuse started in a Florida pool house) and a December 2019 FBI interview (claiming abuse started at age 14 in New York during a headshot session). Menninger references expert testimony from Dr. Loftus regarding memory and trauma to suggest the witness's story is unreliable.
DOJ-OGR-00017107.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (dated August 10, 2022) featuring the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the government failed to record interviews with accusers, preventing the defense from knowing if witnesses were coached. She also attacks witness credibility by highlighting inconsistencies between their testimony and flight logs, and suggesting they added Maxwell to their allegations only after hiring personal injury lawyers.
DOJ-OGR-00017106.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense in a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers, specifically 'Carolyn' and 'Jane,' have changed over time and were improperly influenced by their lawyers and the FBI. She highlights that Carolyn's initial lawsuit didn't mention Maxwell and that Jane was allegedly pressured with leading questions to alter her story to implicate Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017105.jpg
This page contains a portion of a defense summation (Ms. Menninger) arguing that witnesses colluded and were motivated by financial gain. The attorney highlights that a witness named Jane hired lawyer Robert Glassman two weeks before speaking to the FBI in September 2019, specifically to help her civil case. It alleges that law firms like Boies Schiller helped establish the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, which paid out millions without rigorously testing claims, trapping witnesses in their stories.
DOJ-OGR-00017102.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring the opening of the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that Maxwell is innocent and that the government's case relies on stories fabricated through 'erroneous memories, manipulation, and money' facilitated by personal injury lawyers. The defense contends the prosecution successfully proved Jeffrey Epstein was a manipulator but failed to connect his crimes to Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016913.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell and Prosecutor Ms. Comey agree to stipulations regarding the admission of redacted Government Exhibits 52-K, 52-J, and 52-L under seal. Additionally, the parties stipulate that the FBI seized Annie Farmer's boots on June 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00016815.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Young. The questioning focuses on FBI interview protocols, where Young testifies that the FBI records interviews with individuals in custody but does not record witness interviews unless the witness is a minor. An attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully objects to a question about whether recording is an option under FBI protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00016808.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing a sidebar conference. Prosecutor Comey argues that FBI Agent Young should be allowed to testify about non-suggestive interview training to rebut defense claims (supported by Dr. Loftus) that witness memories may have been implanted via leading questions. The Judge expresses skepticism, suggesting the line of questioning is 'beyond the scope' and risks 'opening the door' to broader issues regarding interview conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00016799.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness confirms their involvement in creating an FBI 302 report based on handwritten notes from September 19th, with the final report being typed in December 2019. The witness reads a line from the report into the record: "GM walked by with dog. JE came up to meet her."
DOJ-OGR-00016784.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Richards. Richards, an FBI agent, testifies that their career began in 2003, they trained at the FBI academy in Quantico, Virginia, and they have been stationed at the Fort Pierce resident agency of the Miami division since 2014.
DOJ-OGR-00016783.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court trial held on August 10, 2022. After addressing the jury, the judge allows Mr. Pagliuca to call his next witness, Special Agent Jason Richards. Mr. Pagliuca begins the direct examination, during which Richards identifies himself as an FBI agent who investigates violations of United States laws.
DOJ-OGR-00016772.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues to revisit a ruling to allow the defense to call FBI case agents as witnesses to question their investigative thoroughness, arguing that 'Jane's testimony' made this a live issue. The Court pushes back, citing the Second Circuit case 'Saldarriaga' and maintaining that the government's investigative techniques do not prove the defendant's innocence.
DOJ-OGR-00016672.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the redirect examination of a witness named Loftus. The questioning establishes that Loftus has worked as a consultant for multiple U.S. federal agencies, including the Secret Service, DOJ, FBI, and IRS, while also having a history of testifying for the defense in criminal cases. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes several objections to the line of questioning on grounds of mischaracterization and foundation.
DOJ-OGR-00016627.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The dialogue involves the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Comey discussing procedural matters, including agreed-upon witnesses, a potential government rebuttal expert, and an affidavit by a Mr. Hamilton that the court is reviewing.
DOJ-OGR-00016609.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus, an apparent expert, explains the concept of "post-event suggestion," describing how external information received after an event—through conversations, biased interrogations, or media reports—can influence and contaminate a person's memory. The witness also mentions having consulted for government agencies like the FBI and Secret Service on these topics.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity