FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office officially identified 36 women as victims. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closing of the FBI case against Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Steele was terminated as an FBI source. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | An independent unit within the FBI conducted a source validation report on Steele, finding his re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A FISA application for surveillance on 'Page' was submitted to the FISC, relying on the Steele do... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reiter referred the Epstein case to the FBI to investigate potential federal law violations. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The FBI initiated the 'Crossfire' counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign and i... | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | The FBI initiated the 'Crossfire' counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign durin... | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI initiated a counterintelligence investigation named 'Crossfire' into the Trump campaign's pot... | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Following Jeffrey Epstein's indictment, Reiter referred the case to the FBI to investigate potent... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Robert Lipka caught in FBI sting operation. | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | NSA notified the FBI about the Snowden affair. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The NSA notified the FBI about the initial investigation. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee had a meeting with the FBI at their house. | Interviewee's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump-Russia collusion. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Director James Comey reopened the Hillary Clinton email investigation. | United States | View |
| 2025-11-28 | N/A | FOIA Request Submission | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | FBI domestic investigation questioning Snowden's co-workers. | The Center | View |
| 2025-11-01 | N/A | FBI interviews potential witnesses and victims. | Florida, New York, New Mexico | View |
| 2025-10-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards called the FBI. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-04 | N/A | Government Review | USA | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The DOJ and the FBI issued a memorandum regarding their review of investigative holdings on Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | DOJ and FBI announced conclusion of review of Epstein's crimes and death. | USA | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | FBI opens federal investigation 'Operation Leap Year'. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016484.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 16, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman; Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00016409.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as A. Farmer. The testimony covers A. Farmer's past interactions with the FBI in 2006 and 2020, and an award received from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which A. Farmer describes as a significant amount providing security for their family. The transcript also records objections and rulings by attorneys Ms. Menninger and Ms. Pomerantz, and the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00016406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect examination of Annie Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness regarding a statement made to the FBI in 2006 concerning a massage given to her by Maxwell. The witness describes Maxwell asking her to undress and lay on a table under sheets, and then rubbing her body and pulling back the sheet, before the defense attorney objects.
DOJ-OGR-00016404.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) featuring the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer. The witness testifies regarding statements made to the FBI, specifically asserting that either Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell was responsible for canceling an individual named Maria's trip at the last minute. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections regarding hearsay and foundation, which are overruled by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00016402.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness confirms they provided the government with all relevant entries from their journal and describes the non-relevant entries as typical teenage content. The questioning concludes by asking the witness about their first interview with the FBI in 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00016400.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Attorneys Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe argue before the Judge regarding the admissibility of questioning the witness about whether she explicitly told the FBI she wanted the perpetrator prosecuted in 2006 versus her internal desire for it to happen. The Judge rules that Menninger can ask if the witness wanted him prosecuted, but limits the scope regarding specific statements told to agents if those statements are absent.
DOJ-OGR-00016398.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (sidebar conference) from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, attempts to question witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding her motivation and whether she asked the FBI to prosecute Epstein, citing a 2017 declaration by FBI Agent Kuyrkendall that victims interviewed between 2006-2008 did not want prosecution. The prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the relevance, and the Court sustains the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016397.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on whether her personal experiences and training as a psychologist lend her credibility, and probes into a 2006 conversation she had with FBI Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall. A question about whether she told the agent she wanted a 'Mr. Epstein' prosecuted is met with a sustained objection.
DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger and Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach argue over the relevance of a potential witness identified as 'the other brother' and his potential communications with a witness named 'Jane.' The defense notes they have subpoenaed this brother based on his prior FBI interviews, while the prosecution argues there is no basis for further inquiry as 'Jane' has already testified and the government is not calling 'Brian' as a witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013279.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00013253.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning establishes a timeline of her interactions with the FBI, noting a gap between a meeting in 2007 and renewed contact on March 19, 2019. The testimony confirms that in 2019, Carolyn directed agents to her lawyer, Mr. Scarola, and eventually admitted to receiving emails from the government forwarded by him, despite initial hesitation.
DOJ-OGR-00013251.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on establishing that Carolyn had never previously mentioned a 'Ms. Maxwell' in several key instances: to FBI agents in 2007, in two lawsuits involving Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, or in a 2009 deposition. The witness is also questioned about a 2007 meeting in Florida with a 'Ms. Villaflana,' whom she claims not to recall.
DOJ-OGR-00013210.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to admit a prior document for 'impeachment by omission,' stating that the witness (Carolyn) filed a complaint and was interviewed by the FBI in 2008 regarding sexual abuse by Epstein and his employee Sarah Kellen, but notably failed to mention Ghislaine Maxwell at that time. Pagliuca argues this contradicts the government's current narrative which emphasizes Maxwell's role while downplaying Kellen's.
DOJ-OGR-00013193.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on two civil lawsuits she filed in 2008, her prior discussion with the FBI in 2007, and her memory of her lawyer at the time, Richard Willits. A lawyer, Mr. Pagliuca, interrupts to direct the court's attention to a specific page in a previous deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00013191.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, confronts Carolyn with her 2007 statement to the FBI, in which she allegedly claimed a person named Sarah called her to relay messages from Epstein regarding concert tickets and a request to take photographs. The witness appears to challenge the relevance of the questions to the document she is being shown.
DOJ-OGR-00013189.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between her current testimony and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding her visits to Epstein's residence. Specifically, she is questioned about whether it was Sarah or Maxwell who greeted her on her second visit and Sarah's role in scheduling massages.
DOJ-OGR-00013188.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on refreshing Carolyn's memory about a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 concerning an incident in a kitchen, and a separate 'second visit' where a person named Sarah allegedly led her upstairs. Carolyn confirms the first memory but denies being led upstairs by anyone.
DOJ-OGR-00013186.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a 2007 statement Carolyn made to the FBI regarding a returned phone call from Jeffrey Epstein, which she clarifies may not have been from him personally. The testimony also establishes that Carolyn made a second visit to meet Epstein, during which her boyfriend Sean drove her and waited in the car while she sat in the kitchen talking to a chef.
DOJ-OGR-00013185.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a discrepancy between her current testimony and a 2007 statement she gave to the FBI regarding how she obtained Mr. Epstein's phone number. The transcript also reveals that Epstein paid Carolyn $300 and that she later attempted to schedule a massage by leaving a message with someone named Sarah.
DOJ-OGR-00013182.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony confirms that in 2007, Carolyn told the FBI she saw an older woman with short black hair at Epstein's house. It further details an incident where Ms. Roberts led Carolyn upstairs to Epstein, instructed Carolyn to rub Epstein's legs, while Roberts rubbed his back.
DOJ-OGR-00013180.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on a statement Carolyn made to the FBI in 2007, where she reported seeing an older woman with an unknown accent at Epstein's residence. Carolyn confirms she made the statement and describes the day the FBI came to her home for the interview as a 'bad day'.
DOJ-OGR-00013179.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on impeaching Carolyn's credibility regarding statements she made to the FBI and testimony she gave during a 2009 deposition. Specifically, Carolyn admits she omitted things to the FBI due to embarrassment, while the attorney points out she previously testified under oath that she had told the truth.
DOJ-OGR-00013178.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. She is questioned about a visit to Mr. Epstein's house with Virginia Roberts in 2002 and a subsequent interview with FBI Special Agents Nesbitt and Kuyrkendall in August 2007. During the testimony, Carolyn corrects the questioner's description of a woman she saw at the house.
DOJ-OGR-00013157.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on whether Carolyn was instructed by Ms. Roberts and/or a person named Virginia to lie about her age, claiming to be 17, to a man named Epstein. The transcript confirms Carolyn told the FBI this in 2007 and also discusses her first visit to Epstein's house, arranged by Ms. Roberts, to provide a massage for payment.
DOJ-OGR-00013155.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a prior conversation Carolyn had with a 'Ms. Roberts' about the possibility of making 'a lot of money real fast,' which Carolyn denies occurred as stated. The transcript also includes procedural discussions between the attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey) and the judge regarding the witness's memory versus a document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity