FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013154.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on a statement Carolyn allegedly made to the FBI in August 2007, claiming that a person named Virginia told her she could earn $300 by massaging a man in Palm Beach. Carolyn denies making that statement to the FBI at that time, asserting she was told about the massage opportunity later, at Mr. Epstein's house.
DOJ-OGR-00013152.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney questions her about a statement she allegedly made to the FBI in 2007, claiming Virginia offered her $300 at a party. Carolyn denies the accuracy of the statement, clarifying the event was not a party and took place at Virginia's house.
DOJ-OGR-00013151.jpg
This document is page 138 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness denies drinking alcohol or doing drugs and emphatically denies an allegation that Virginia Roberts approached her at a party about making $300. The witness confirms she first spoke to the FBI about Mr. Epstein in 2007. Attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey participate in the procedural handling of evidence binders.
DOJ-OGR-00013140.jpg
This document is a transcript of direct examination testimony from a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Carolyn testifies that she has not spoken to her ex-boyfriend, Sean, since their breakup regarding Epstein or her testimony. She confirms that she was interviewed by the FBI in 2007, where she identified an older woman with short black hair and an accent (Maxwell) at Epstein's residence during a visit with Virginia.
DOJ-OGR-00013061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. Flatley identifies themselves as the CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) coordinator and a digital forensic examiner for the FBI with over 16 years of experience. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the testimony relative to Rule 702 (expert vs. fact testimony).
DOJ-OGR-00013014.jpg
Cover page of the official transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 7, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The document lists Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (US Attorneys) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00012997.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of a photograph as evidence. The defense, represented by Ms. Menninger, objects to the photograph's authentication, while the prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, argues it was properly seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. Ms. Moe further contends the photograph's relevance is self-evident as it depicts the relationship between Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00012992.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (dated August 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony details the forensic process of copying physical CDs onto an FBI computer and reviewing the contained images for case relevancy. The witness also authenticates Government Exhibit 1101, a chart correlating exhibit numbers with FBI '1B' numbers and CD names.
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defendant's motions regarding sentencing. The prosecution asserts that the 2004 Sentencing Manual should apply, citing trial testimony that the conspiracy extended past 2004, and refutes the defendant's claim of having left the conspiracy and her association with Epstein in 2002. The document also notes that the government is prepared to present additional evidence, a message book seized by the Palm Beach Police Department, at the sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00009079.jpg
This document is page 12 (questionnaire page 13) of a jury questionnaire filed on February 24, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The respondent is identified as Juror ID 50. The juror answers 'No' to questions 24, 25, and 26, indicating they have not been subject to grand jury investigations, have not been a victim of a crime, and have not had legal disputes with US government agencies like the FBI or NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00008957.jpg
This legal document argues that the defense was hindered by the unavailability of contemporaneous phone and property records for Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and accusers. It cites two examples: the inability to challenge Carolyn's testimony that Maxwell called her to set up appointments, and the inability to rebut accuser Jane's testimony about the timing of her sexual abuse at Epstein's New York townhouse, which she described in detail.
DOJ-OGR-00008945.jpg
This legal document is a motion arguing for the convictions of Ms. Maxwell on Counts One, Three, and Four to be vacated. The defense contends that the jury was improperly influenced by evidence of conduct in New Mexico involving a person named 'Jane', which was not part of the original indictment. This created a 'constructive amendment' or a prejudicial 'variance' between the indictment and the proof at trial, warranting a new trial on these counts.
DOJ-OGR-00031408.jpg
This document is a faxed printout of a news article describing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the police chief's frustration with the lenient plea deal and initial indictment, the involvement of high-profile lawyers like Kenneth Starr, and Epstein's claims of anti-Semitism. The text also describes Epstein's home environment, possession of firearms (Glock), and lists several female associates including Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen.
DOJ-OGR-00019853.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she was living openly in her New Hampshire home, her lawyers were in communication with the government, and she had not left the U.S. for years. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid as a reason for her to seek privacy for safety.
DOJ-OGR-00017334.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017305.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, with the Honorable Alison J. Nathan presiding as District Judge. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey. They are debating whether the testimony of Special Agent Jason Richards is a relevant response to a jury note concerning an FBI deposition and the cross-examination of a person named Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request to include the testimony but agrees to redact the jury foreperson's name from the notes before making them public.
DOJ-OGR-00017280.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during jury deliberations. The jury sent notes requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition (3505-005) related to Carolyn. Counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) discuss preparing these documents with necessary redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00017202.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues against the defense's conspiracy theory by highlighting the consistency of eight witnesses (including Juan Alessi and accusers like Annie and Carolyn) and pointing out the chronological impossibility of a conspiracy formed in 2019, given that incriminating statements were made to the FBI and in depositions in 2006 and 2009. The prosecutor references corroborating evidence such as flight records, FedEx records, and message pads.
DOJ-OGR-00013985.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. The witness, identified as Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), is testifying on direct examination about the concepts of 'post-event information' and 'post-event suggestion' and how conversations, biased interrogations, and media exposure can contaminate human memory. She also mentions her professional experience consulting with the FBI and Secret Service regarding interviewing techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00013784.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms she first spoke with the FBI in 2006 without a lawyer present and acknowledges receiving a significant financial award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Farmer states the money provides security for her family and explicitly denies having any financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013781.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness recounts what she told the FBI in 2006 about a massage given to her by someone named Maxwell, describing being asked to undress and being touched. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the testimony on the grounds that it is narrative.
DOJ-OGR-00013780.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect of A. Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022. During questioning by Ms. Pomerantz, the witness confirms telling the FBI in 2006 that Ghislaine Maxwell demonstrated how to give Jeffrey Epstein a foot massage, after which the witness began doing it on her own. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections regarding leading questions and the witness reading from a document.
DOJ-OGR-00013779.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer. The testimony concerns a statement made to the FBI regarding a trip to New Mexico, specifically that either Epstein or Maxwell was responsible for canceling 'Maria's' trip at the last minute. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on grounds of hearsay and foundation, but is overruled by the Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity