| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
NYPD
|
Joint task force |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
PBPD / PBSO
|
Inter agency cooperation |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmom
|
Interviewee interviewer |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Investigative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Witness investigator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Steele
|
Source terminated |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Informant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Collaboration |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Professional bureaucratic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Amanda Young
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Informant interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Investigative informant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing detailing extreme delays in the FBI's processing of Jeffrey Epstein's FOIA requests. The author recounts an August 2015 call with Mr. Argall, who indicated that at the current pace of 500 pages every 5.5 months, the remaining 11,000 pages would take ten years to produce. The document argues these delays violate FOIA statutes and Obama-era transparency policies, citing relevant case law (*Clemente v. FBI*) to highlight the unreasonableness of the FBI's timeline.
This is a letter dated August 19, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to the DOJ's Office of Information Policy, appealing on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein regarding the FBI's slow processing of a FOIA request. Weinberg argues that the FBI is failing to meet its statutory obligations, noting that only two batches of documents have been produced in over two years from a file exceeding 12,000 pages, and projecting that at the current pace, the file won't be fully processed until 2025. The letter references previous correspondence with FBI Liaison Dennis Argall and requests the OIP to compel the FBI to comply promptly.
This document is a printout of a news article (likely Miami Herald) detailing the reassignment of the Epstein case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. Pak following a ruling by Judge Kenneth Marra. The article highlights that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing a non-prosecution agreement from Epstein's victims, granting immunity to Epstein and accomplices despite a 53-page federal indictment draft. It also notes the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation and the misleading of victims regarding the status of the FBI case.
This document, seemingly a printout of a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, details the reassignment of the Epstein case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. Pak following a ruling by Judge Kenneth Marra. The article highlights the findings of the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation, noting that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta broke the law by concealing a plea deal from victims, granting Epstein and accomplices immunity despite a ready 53-page federal indictment. It describes how prosecutors misled victims into believing an FBI investigation was ongoing when it had been secretly closed.
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article by Emily Michot regarding the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It details Judge Marra's ruling that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by misleading victims and sealing the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta. The text highlights that Epstein worked with others to procure minors and that victims' attorneys are petitioning the DOJ to reopen the investigation.
This document is the second page of a correspondence (likely an email) addressed to 'Jeffrey' from a self-described CFA candidate and prospective hedge-fund manager. The sender discusses the risks and mechanics of an algorithmic trading model, citing market volatility caused by events like Brexit, the 2016 Pound flash-crash, and the US elections involving Trump and Clinton. The sender outlines a minimum investment requirement of $10,000 and defines various technical trading terms for the recipient.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' detailing a complex legal battle where Jeffrey Epstein sued attorney Bradley Edwards and Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein. Epstein alleged that Rothstein used litigation against him as 'bait' to lure investors into a Ponzi scheme, while also attempting to discredit a victim (L.M.) by claiming she was a prostitute who changed her story after hiring Edwards. Edwards responded with a motion for summary judgment, arguing Epstein's claims were frivolous and noting that Epstein pleaded the Fifth Amendment dozens of times during depositions.
This document is a page from a James Patterson book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records. It details former State Attorney Barry Krischer's life after the Epstein case and describes a December 2009 RICO lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein against Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein, attorney Bradley Edwards, and a victim identified as 'L.M.' The text outlines Epstein's allegations that Edwards knew about Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and claims that the victim 'L.M.' had credibility issues involving drug use and changing stories.
These pages, likely from the book 'Filthy Rich' and marked as House Oversight evidence, detail Alan Dershowitz's defense of his legal work for Jeffrey Epstein and his conflict with attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The text describes a protest against Dershowitz at Johns Hopkins University and his assertion that he is proud of the 'good deal' he secured for Epstein. It concludes with the details of an April 8, 2016 settlement where Edwards and Cassell withdrew sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz, and Dershowitz withdrew his claims of unethical conduct against them.
This document contains pages 248-249 from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich,' submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the narrator's (implied to be Virginia Roberts Giuffre) account of being contacted by a man impersonating an FBI agent who was actually working for Epstein, followed by a threatening call from Epstein and his lawyer demanding her silence. The text also discusses the legal fallout, including a declaration stricken from the record in a victims' lawsuit and subsequent defamation battles involving Alan Dershowitz and Bradley Edwards.
This document appears to be a page from a book (likely by James Patterson) included in House Oversight Committee evidence. It details a first-person account of a victim who, after escaping 'sexual slavery' to a new country, was subjected to an intimidation campaign. The witness describes receiving a suspicious call from a 'supposed FBI agent' followed immediately by calls from Epstein's associates and Epstein himself, suggesting the 'FBI' call was a ruse to locate them or coordinate intimidation.
This document contains pages 246-247 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details the account of a victim (contextually Virginia Giuffre) who escaped to Australia in late 2002 with her husband to hide from Jeffrey Epstein and his "powerful friends" who she feared might have her killed. The text describes a suspicious phone call she received years later from a man claiming to be with the FBI, whom she suspected was actually working for Epstein because he immediately asked about sexual practices rather than following standard law enforcement protocols.
This document is an excerpt from a book (James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records (page 246). It features a numbered first-person account, likely by Virginia Giuffre, detailing her escape from Jeffrey Epstein's employment in late 2002. The narrator describes meeting her future husband in Chiang Mai, Thailand, during massage training, and subsequently fleeing to Australia where she remained in hiding until 2013 due to fear of retribution from Epstein. The text also details a suspicious phone call received in 2007 from a man claiming to be with the FBI, whom the narrator suspected was actually an agent for Epstein attempting to locate or intimidate her.
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 240-241) from a book, likely by James Patterson, stamped with a House Oversight control number. It discusses the state of affairs in September 2014, noting that FBI investigations into Epstein appeared stalled, while recounting a 2008 legal motion filed by lawyer Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities. Dershowitz is quoted denying these allegations entirely.
This document consists of pages 248-249 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped as evidence for House Oversight. The text details a victim's (likely Virginia Roberts) account of being contacted by a 'supposed FBI agent' who she realized was actually working for Epstein. It describes a subsequent call with Epstein and his lawyer where she was intimidated into promising silence to protect her safety. The text also discusses the legal fallout involving Alan Dershowitz and Bradley Edwards regarding defamation claims stemming from these allegations.
This document appears to be a page from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich'), presenting a quoted legal declaration (paragraphs 39-42) from a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The text details a campaign of witness intimidation, describing three specific phone calls: one from a 'supposed FBI agent,' one from an Epstein associate offering a bribe ('be looked after') for silence, and a third involving Epstein and his lawyer (explicitly not Alan Dershowitz) threatening the victim. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight committee production.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich') containing a witness statement (likely Virginia Giuffre, based on the specific biographical details of Chiang Mai and Australia). The narrator describes meeting her husband in Chiang Mai during massage training, deciding to flee Epstein's employment in late 2002, and hiding in Australia until 2013 out of fear that Epstein or his 'powerful friends' would have her killed. She also details a suspicious 2007 phone call from a man claiming to be with the FBI, whom she suspected was actually an agent for Epstein trying to locate or intimidate her.
This document is a scan of pages 240-241 from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') produced as evidence for House Oversight. Chapter 63, set in September 2014, discusses the stalling FBI investigation into Epstein and recounts a 2008 legal motion filed by Bradley Edwards accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating in Epstein's illegal activities, which Dershowitz denied.
This document is an excerpt from a book (likely by James Patterson) detailing the legal aftermath for Epstein's employee, Alfredo Rodriguez. It describes Rodriguez attempting to sell material evidence (including victim names) to an undercover agent for $50,000, his subsequent arrest in 2010, and his 18-month prison sentence—contrasted with Epstein's lenient work release. The second page discusses the relationship between Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell, mentioning visits to Windsor Castle and Sandringham in 2000.
This document is an excerpt from pages 218-219 of the book 'Filthy Rich', detailing an FBI sting operation against a man named Rodriguez, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein (2004-2005). Rodriguez attempted to sell a stolen 'black book' and legal notes containing contact information for high-profile figures (including Donald Trump, Ted Kennedy, and Mick Jagger) for $50,000. He was arrested by an undercover FBI agent (UCE) for Obstruction of Official Proceedings after accepting the money.
The document describes an attempt by Rodriguez to sell stolen information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, including lists of underage girls and famous contacts, to a lawyer for $50,000. The lawyer contacted the FBI, leading to a sting operation where Rodriguez met an undercover agent, admitted to possessing the stolen items, and was subsequently detained.
This text, likely from a memoir or legal account, defends a controversial prosecution decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The author argues that the plea deal was the best possible outcome given the evidence and victim reluctance at the time, ensuring jail time and sex offender registration rather than risking a failed trial. The passage also criticizes the defense's tactics, including personal investigations into prosecutors, while acknowledging frustrations with Epstein's treatment in state custody.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of prosecutorial discretion, federal versus state enforcement redundancy, and political accountability in the context of police violence and other crimes. It highlights the 'executive separation of powers' model and the limitations of democratic accountability for elected state prosecutors. The page also contains numerous footnotes citing legal precedents, government reports, and academic works related to the Department of Justice and civil rights enforcement.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the lack of federal jurisdiction overlap in sexual assault cases compared to public corruption, noting that federal law usually only applies in specific instances like human trafficking or crimes on federal property. The footnotes extensively cite the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)) and various state constitutions regarding a victim's right to confer with the prosecution, a legal issue relevant to the handling of the Epstein case.
This page is an extract from a legal brief or filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to the Epstein investigation). It cites a Minnesota Law Review article discussing the limitations of victims' rights in the U.S. compared to other jurisdictions, specifically noting that U.S. victims generally lack the power to challenge prosecutorial discretion (decisions not to prosecute). The document includes extensive footnotes citing various examples of enforcement discretion and budget limitations in contexts like tax law and marijuana enforcement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity