Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation involving Epstein where his lawyers attacked the credibility of the girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process blocked by Epstein and co-conspirators, leading to the need for alternative inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged criminal scheme and the defense's efforts to secure non-prosecution and immigra... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement provisions precluding criminal charges and immigration proceedings against certain indi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing for an 18-month incarceration, reduced from a 'non-negoti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, i... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor girl (Jane Doe #5) was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Brillo Way for massages and/or sex ... | Epstein's mansion on El Bri... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving 12 months of house arrest at his Palm Beach home, with curfew, no unsupervised co... | Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea deal (non-prosecution agreement) for two prostitution charges. | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail with work release privileges. | Palm Beach County jail | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attempt to get out of the NPA after it was signed. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017464.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski during a trial related to the Epstein case (filed Aug 10, 2022). The witness confirms that Emmy Tayler was an assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell (starting around 1997) and that she flew on Epstein's planes. The witness also acknowledges familiarity with the name Andy Farmer but does not recall him being on any flights or knowing of any records of him flying.
DOJ-OGR-00017463.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Visoski regarding flights on Epstein's planes. The witness admits to not always meeting passengers and being unable to confirm if a specific person named 'Jane' was on certain flights. The questioning concludes with the witness confirming that Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, did fly on Epstein's planes.
DOJ-OGR-00017456.jpg
This is page 94 of a court transcript (Document 743, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Visoski, confirms during cross-examination that Epstein had an assistant with a specific name and that he had met her. The proceedings are interrupted by attorneys Everdell and Comey to discuss a 'choreography issue' regarding an exhibit that must be submitted under seal rather than displayed on screens.
DOJ-OGR-00017455.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by Mr. Everdell. The questioning centers on three flights from 1996, 1997, and 1998, and Visoski's inability to confirm whether a woman referred to as 'Jane' was on them. The witness states they cannot distinguish between individuals with the same first name from over 20 years ago, especially without last names, and acknowledges there were other people in 'Epstein's world' with that same first name.
DOJ-OGR-00017451.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning establishes that Jeffrey Epstein had a home and office in Columbus, Ohio, near Les Wexner's home. The witness confirms being questioned by the government about a woman referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane', whom the witness recalls seeing on Epstein's plane on one occasion in the 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00017448.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The testimony focuses on flight logs showing trips to Interlochen in August and confirms that Epstein owned a cabin there. Visoski mentions a rumor that the cabin was originally bought or built for violinist Itzhak Perlman, or possibly donated to the Interlochen School.
DOJ-OGR-00017447.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony establishes that during the 1990s, Visoski flew Epstein to Traverse City, Michigan, during the summer months. The witness confirms that world-famous violinist Itzhak Perlman was also a passenger on some of these flights and that Epstein frequently visited Interlochen during this period.
DOJ-OGR-00014542.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for a defense team. Menninger argues that the witness, Juan Alessi, is not credible by pointing out that he reported directly to Epstein, not Ghislaine, and by citing an email between Ghislaine and Sally Markham where Alessi's work was called 'truly awful'. She further undermines his credibility by discussing his inconsistent testimony regarding a household manual and a black address book.
DOJ-OGR-00014540.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for an associate of Epstein. Menninger argues that Epstein's financial activities, such as paying for employees' children's education and giving away land, were acts of generosity and not for illicit purposes as the prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, suggests. The summation highlights the lack of testimony from key figures like Epstein's accountant, Harry Beller, or bank officials from JPMorgan, urging the jury not to speculate on the purpose of the financial transactions.
DOJ-OGR-00014533.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense in a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger challenges the prosecution's evidence by questioning a witness's ability to identify accents, discrediting the expert testimony of Dr. Rocchio by framing her as a 'victim apologist' and not a forensic expert, and asserting there is no evidence Maxwell groomed key individuals like Carolyn, Annie, or Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00014532.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to discredit the testimony of a witness named Carolyn. Menninger argues there is no physical evidence, such as phone or FedEx records, to support Carolyn's claim of being contacted by Ghislaine Maxwell. She further uses the testimony of Carolyn's boyfriend, Shawn, to undermine Carolyn's credibility by highlighting his statements about her drug use and his identification of Epstein and Sarah Kellen as the actual callers to their shared phone.
DOJ-OGR-00014515.jpg
This document is a legal summation describing the testimony of Ms. Menninger regarding two encounters with Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting with her sister in his office to discuss college applications, and the second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported to the Victims Compensation Fund as sexual abuse. The testimony also asserts that Ghislaine Maxwell was not present or involved in these events.
DOJ-OGR-00014512.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022, arguing that a witness named Jane has an unreliable and 'contaminated' memory. The speaker presents evidence, including testimony from other witnesses (Annie, Larry Visoski) and a flight log, to contradict Jane's account of events involving Epstein's Santa Fe property. The summation alleges that Jane deliberately altered her timeline to make herself seem younger and that her memory was influenced by news reports and conversations with family.
DOJ-OGR-00014511.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in a trial related to Epstein. The speaker challenges a witness's testimony about Epstein's New York house by pointing out she failed to recall a major 1994 renovation mentioned by Larry Visoski. The speaker also argues that no government staff corroborated the witness's story or confirmed anything unusual, and introduces testimony from Cim Espinosa, who worked for Epstein and booked guests like "Jane" and her mother into his apartments.
DOJ-OGR-00014509.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues against the government's claim that a woman named Michelle is a random person, citing testimony from witnesses Jane and Michelle herself to establish that she is a specific individual who was friends with another person named Emmy. The summation aims to prove that Jane is not fabricating connections but identifying real people she encountered in 'Epstein's world'.
DOJ-OGR-00014504.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that a witness's testimony is unreliable due to significant memory lapses and inconsistencies, specifically highlighting contradictory accounts given to the FBI versus in court regarding the location and circumstances of the first instance of sexual abuse involving Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014497.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is challenging the credibility of a witness named 'Jane'. Menninger points out that Jane failed to identify Ghislaine and other women in a sworn pleading, despite allegedly being with them. She also contrasts Jane's claims of extreme poverty and homelessness with evidence that she and her two brothers applied for an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year for three years.
DOJ-OGR-00011715.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement, likely from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim. The attorney argues that the four female accusers, who are using pseudonyms, are unreliable witnesses motivated by money ("a payday"). She claims their stories have changed over time, were only told after Epstein's death, and are based on flawed, contaminated memories, which will be discussed in expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00011714.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. She describes Jeffrey Epstein's use of private jets as 'commuter jets' for a wide variety of guests, including friends, professionals, and girlfriends. Sternheim also outlines the relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine, stating that their personal 'companionship' ended, but Ghislaine continued to work for him as an employee.
DOJ-OGR-00011713.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. She describes the relationship between Ghislaine and Epstein, stating it evolved from friendship to an employer-employee dynamic where Ghislaine managed his extensive real estate portfolio. The statement also outlines Epstein's lifestyle, including his various properties in Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the Virgin Islands, and foreshadows testimony about their separate travels and Epstein's relationships with other women.
DOJ-OGR-00011707.jpg
This document is a transcript of the defense's opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that the jury must focus solely on whether the government can prove the charges against Maxwell, not on the actions of Epstein. She characterizes the prosecution's case as weak, asserting it relies on the testimony of four accusers whose memories are unreliable, corrupted over 25 years, and motivated by a desire for money.
DOJ-OGR-00011704.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
DOJ-OGR-00011700.jpg
This document is a page from a prosecutor's (Ms. Pomerantz) opening statement in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor alleges that the defendant conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and facilitate the sexual abuse of multiple underage girls. Specific examples cited include the abuse of a girl named 'Jane' in New York and Florida, and the grooming and abuse of a 16-year-old girl at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00011698.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. Pomerantz alleges that an unnamed female defendant knowingly assisted Epstein in luring young girls by providing a 'cover of respectability.' The statement introduces the case of 'Jane,' who was 14 when she met the pair in 1994 and was subsequently invited to Epstein's Palm Beach home under the false pretense of mentorship and scholarships.
DOJ-OGR-00011697.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz, filed on August 10, 2022. She outlines the prosecution's case, detailing a decade-long sexual abuse scheme where Epstein assaulted teenage girls, and alleges that an unnamed female defendant was an essential accomplice who recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein on July 6, 2004.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein on July 6, 2004.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein on July 6, 2004. This is supported by message pads entered at trial.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein in late April or early May 2004.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein once in late April or early May 2004. This is supported by message pads entered at trial.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein in late April or early May 2004.
Request for employment
A phone message from 2004, presented as Government Exhibit 1-B, where Carolyn (identified by her full name) states she wants to work for Epstein.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Affidavit of prosecution
The narrator faxed an affidavit of prosecution to Epstein, asking him to complete it to indicate he did not wish to prosecute and return it.
Package sent by Federal
Package sent via Federal (likely FedEx); document mentions prior gifts included lingerie.
Returned Your Call
OKEN left a message for Epstein indicating that they had returned his call.
Package delivery
In or about October 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida.
Package
Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida.
Package sent via Federal Express
In or about October of 2002, Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from an address in Manhattan to Carolyn in Florida.
Annie's trip to New Mexico
The witness (Swain) spoke with Epstein on the phone a few days to a week before Annie's trip to New Mexico.
Offer for Annie to visit New York and help with her educa...
Epstein initiated multiple calls with the witness, starting in December 1995. In the first call, he offered to fly Annie to New York to visit Maria for Christmas. In subsequent calls, he discussed helping Annie with her college selection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity