Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Tour of Manhattan mansion | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of standard operating procedures for scheduling Epstein's flights. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancellation of Maria's trip to New Mexico | New Mexico (intended destin... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Time period covering the 'Materials' (sensitive documents and photos of victims). | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement by Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's illegal activities involving under-aged girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Psychological Reconstruction | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein beginning refurbishment of his Caribbean Island. | Caribbean Island | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein befriending Bill Clinton in his after-office life. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Execution of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Implied Eleventh Circuit ju... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein expanding holdings in New Mexico. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein buying an airplane, and then another. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation campaign involving coordinated calls from a fake FBI agent and Epstein's team. | Telephone | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor Victim-3 began having sexual contact with Epstein at age 17. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner event mentioned where an editor of Vanity Fair was present. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein joining the board of Rockefeller University. | Rockefeller University | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein joining the Trilateral Commission. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein purchasing a large private house in Manhattan from Les Wexner. | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta told OPR he was 'increasingly frustrated' by Epstein's desire for an '11th hour appeal'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Travel with Epstein and Maxwell | Various (Travel) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein got into bed with the witness (A. Farmer) in New Mexico, put his arms around her. She fel... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interactions with Minor Victim-3 | Unspecified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014800.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a judge's decision to overrule an objection regarding the defendant, Ms. Maxwell's, financial assets. The judge asserts that an uncertain asset, along with a $10 million bequest from Epstein, must be considered when determining her ability to pay a fine, as she has failed to prove otherwise. The transcript highlights the court's view of Maxwell's finances as a 'moving target'.
DOJ-OGR-00014798.jpg
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The text details a recruitment chain involving the defendant, Virginia [Giuffre], Carolyn, and Melissa, noting that Melissa's name appears in the defendant's 'little black book.' The court also discusses financial fines, specifically mentioning the defendant's objection to including a $10 million bequest from Jeffrey Epstein as part of her assets.
DOJ-OGR-00014794.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 22, 2022, is a transcript of a judge's ruling regarding a sentencing calculation. The judge finds that two minor victims, Virginia Roberts and Melissa, were trafficked and abused by the defendant and Epstein and should be considered for sentencing purposes, even though they were not named in the indictment. Citing precedent from the Second Circuit, the judge overrules the defendant's objection and decides to treat the conduct against these two victims as additional counts of conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00014793.jpg
This legal document is a court transcript or ruling where a judge dismisses a defense argument. The judge affirms that an 'undue influence' enhancement applies to the defendant's sex trafficking conviction involving a victim named Carolyn. The judge cites Carolyn's financial vulnerability (drug addiction, newborn son) and the significant age gap with Epstein as clear evidence of undue influence, making the defense's argument 'meritless'.
DOJ-OGR-00014790.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) discussing the legal definition of 'extensive' criminal activity for sentencing purposes. It details the hierarchy of the conspiracy, naming Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants, noting Sarah Kellen joined in 2002, and identifying Virginia and Carolyn as recruiters of minors starting in 2001. It also credits testimony from employee Juan Alessi regarding his unknowing facilitation of sexualized massages under the defendant's instructions and mentions pilots Visoski and Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00014785.jpg
This legal document excerpt discusses the evidence regarding whether Carolyn was sex trafficked after November 1, 2004, and before she turned 18 in early 2005. It details Carolyn's testimony about her contacts with Epstein, including visits to his house and phone calls in 2004, and his alleged comments about her age and friends, all within the context of a conspiracy to traffic her.
DOJ-OGR-00014781.jpg
This court transcript excerpt discusses the supervisory authority of Kellen, an employee, in relation to Maxwell, Epstein, and an unnamed defendant. It details arguments about whether Kellen's actions, such as making calls and scheduling massage appointments, constituted supervisory authority, and mentions testimony from pilots regarding Kellen's reporting structure. The discussion also touches upon a five-point enhancement for sex offenders.
DOJ-OGR-00014772.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a discussion about the date of a message relevant to a criminal case. An attorney, Ms. Moe, argues to the court that the message is from November 2004, citing surrounding dates in a message pad, the defendant's travel with Epstein at that time, and testimony from a victim named Carolyn as evidence of an ongoing conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00014763.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, dated August 22, 2022, in which a judge overrules several objections. The objections concern evidence from a 2005 search of Epstein's Palm Beach residence indicating additional minor victims, the defendant's responsibility for these victims, and the inclusion of a victim impact statement from a person named Kate. The judge confirms that with certain redactions, the defense no longer objects to Kate's statement.
DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, in which the judge overrules objections from the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The court finds by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant personally recruited Virginia (Giuffre) while she was a minor to provide sexualized massages to Epstein, was aware of the sexual nature of these acts, and used monetary incentives to encourage Virginia to recruit another minor, Carolyn. The judge cites testimony from witnesses Annie, Jane, Kate, and Mr. Alessi, as well as flight records.
DOJ-OGR-00014756.jpg
This legal document is a court ruling from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 22, 2022. The judge overrules objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, regarding her role in isolating minor girls and participating in a recruitment scheme with Epstein. The ruling cites trial testimony from witnesses 'Annie' and 'Jane' and details the recruitment chain starting with the defendant recruiting 'Virginia', who then enlisted 'Carolyn', who recruited others.
DOJ-OGR-00014754.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing a judge's rulings on objections from an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge overrules objections concerning the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, citing evidence from the trial. This evidence includes testimony from Juan Alessi about Maxwell targeting a victim named Virginia at Mar-a-Lago, metadata linking Maxwell to a document via the username 'Ghislaine', and bank statements showing a $23 million transfer from Epstein to Maxwell during their conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00008590.jpg
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) in a federal criminal case, filed on December 18, 2021. It details the 'overt act' element required to prove a conspiracy charge, listing specific allegations from the indictment against conspirators Maxwell and Epstein. The alleged overt acts, occurring between 1994 and 2002, involve the sexual abuse and exploitation of underage victims identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.
DOJ-OGR-00008508.jpg
This document is page 52 of a legal filing from December 17, 2021, in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It contains jury instructions regarding the legal definition and requirements for proving an "overt act" as part of a conspiracy. The instructions clarify that the government does not need to prove Maxwell herself committed the act, that the act does not have to be one specifically listed in the indictment, and that a conviction on certain counts cannot be based solely on the testimony of a witness named Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00008507.jpg
This legal document, part of an indictment, details overt acts related to a criminal case against Epstein and Maxwell. It outlines specific instances between 1994 and 2004 where they allegedly conspired to recruit and sexually abuse several minors, identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn, in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The document describes methods of enticement, such as arranging travel and providing cash payments, and alleges that one victim, Carolyn, was also encouraged to recruit other girls.
DOJ-OGR-00008506.jpg
This document outlines Jury Instruction No. 36 regarding the 'Third Element' of a conspiracy charge, specifically requiring proof of an 'overt act.' It details specific allegations from the indictment against Maxwell involving Epstein and victims identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn across various years and locations.
DOJ-OGR-00008406.jpg
This legal document is a court ruling from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. The Court has decided to exclude a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) involving Epstein from evidence, arguing that while the defense can cross-examine witnesses for bias or financial incentives, the NPA itself is not relevant. The ruling notes that the NPA does not provide protection in the current jurisdiction, distinguishing it from the Southern District of Florida where a witness might be protected.
DOJ-OGR-00008391.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing, specifically page 5 of 6 from Document 548 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 15, 2021. The Court denies the Defense's request for a witness to testify under a pseudonym, arguing that the witness does not qualify as a victim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act because her anticipated testimony is that she was not a target of sexual misconduct by Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. The Court distinguishes this situation from a prior ruling where pseudonyms were allowed to protect the identities of other, actual victims.
DOJ-OGR-00008380.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, discusses the defendant's attempt to introduce statements from Robert Glassman to impeach a witness named Jane. The document details Jane's evolving testimony about a trip to New York with Epstein and the defendant to see 'The Lion King,' noting that her corrected recollections were communicated to the Government by her lawyer. The prosecution argues that Glassman's testimony on these same points is unnecessary and that questions about Jane's conversations with him were met with sustained objections.
DOJ-OGR-00008377.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, is a motion from the prosecution arguing against allowing testimony from an individual named Scarola. The prosecution contends that Scarola's proposed testimony regarding another witness, Carolyn, is irrelevant and non-impeaching, as the information has already been obtained from Carolyn directly. The document also details over $3.2 million in compensation Carolyn received from claims related to Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and discusses a 2020 meeting where Scarola showed Carolyn a picture of an Epstein associate.
DOJ-OGR-00008331.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 12/10/21) detailing a legal argument regarding expert witnesses. The defense discusses the potential testimony of Mr. Kelso, noting it depends on the testimony of government witness Mr. Flatley, who will speak about metadata retrieved from devices seized at Epstein's home. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach responds that the government has provided ample notice and '3500 information' regarding Flatley's expected testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00008276.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, addresses the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, described as a 'book' or 'household manual' belonging to Epstein and Maxwell. It discusses the defendant's challenge to Alessi's knowledge regarding the exhibit's origins and highlights the manual's contents, which detail practices and relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and other individuals. The document asserts that authentication does not require direct knowledge of creation or seizure, and chain of custody issues pertain to weight rather than admissibility.
DOJ-OGR-00008275.jpg
This legal document is a court filing by the Government arguing for the admission of a contact book (Government Exhibit 52) as evidence. The argument relies on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Epstein, who identified the book as being from Epstein's Palm Beach house. Alessi confirmed the book's appearance and recognized names within it, establishing its authenticity and relevance to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00008223.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 5, 2021. The prosecution outlines its plan to question 'Witness-3' about sexual activity with Epstein, adhering to the court's order to avoid explicit details. The government expresses concern that this limited questioning could be misinterpreted by the jury as a lack of witness credibility, especially in light of the defense's opening argument.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Complaint
Epstein filed a complaint which Edwards alleges was done without probable cause for the purpose of extortion.
Decision not to prosecute
Epstein personally met with Capt. Elmer Gudger and advised him that he no longer wished to prosecute Juan Alessi for burglary and theft.
Recruitment
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
Ghislaine being there
Epstein called Annie's mom and talked to her about Ghislaine being present for a trip.
No Subject
Accusers offered to send photos to Epstein while he was in jail.
Recruiting other girls
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
Socializing
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
No Subject
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
Job offer
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
Future contact
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Maria's artistic career
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
Important Message
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Unwanted touching
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Unknown
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
Future contact for work
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
Second thoughts about public figure status
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
Instruction to write down contact information
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Presence at New Mexico residence
Epstein consistently notified Detective Deborah Anaya, a New Mexico official, whenever he spent time at his residence in New Mexico.
Ongoing communication
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
General conversation
The witness, A. Farmer, testified that she spoke with Epstein by phone approximately two or three times after her trip to New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity