| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR's investigation into potential improper influence in the Epstein matter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) where Epstein's legal team raised his financia... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting Epstein on a flight to TED. | In a jet, en route to TED. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Tea at Epstein's house in New York, where Epstein inquired about media. | Epstein's house, New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical scenario described by Ghislaine Maxwell involving money laundering, theft, and recov... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | John Roth handled Starr's letter and reviewed materials related to the Epstein matter, limiting h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Roth told OPR he understood Epstein had reneged on the NPA and considered it a "dead letter," thu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deputy Attorney General Filip told OPR he believed the NPA was still in effect and that Epstein w... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein requested a meeting to argue for relief, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein meeting Princess Diana at an event. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein being invited to a house in the Vineyard or Nantucket, where he met Prince Andrew. | Vineyard or Nantucket | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein traveling to the Bahamas, hanging out with Sarah Ferguson, and meeting Prince Andrew. | Bahamas | View |
| N/A | N/A | First massage incident: MD provided a massage to Epstein. Epstein masturbated, exposed himself, a... | Epstein's house (master bed... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second massage incident: MD was approached to provide another massage. Epstein instructed her to ... | Epstein's house (master bed... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months of an 18-month sentence at Palm Beach County Stockade with work-release ... | Palm Beach County Stockade | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein began serving one year of probation at his Palm Beach mansion and registered as a lifelon... | Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein potentially met or sat with Diana at an event, which was believed to be organized by Rosa. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's guilty plea and rendering the agreement difficult to unwind. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Consideration of declaring Epstein in breach of the NPA, which could lead to litigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State court plea for Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation of Epstein resolved through a state-based plea and NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Shut down of TerraMar due to 'Epstein drama'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein ordered daily massages following workout sessions. | N/A | View |
This document contains excerpts from a deposition of Epstein, where he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment in response to questions about procuring minors for prostitution, sexual acts with minors, and his 'personal sexual preference for children.' It also references a Complaint filed by 'L.M.' against Epstein in September 2008, which mentions a litigation team seeking to turn facts involving underage females and a 'Palm Beach billionaire' into a 'goldmine'.
This document page details the terms of a 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office, which included immunity for co-conspirators like Nadia Marcinkova. It also highlights that victims E.W. and L.M. were misled by the FBI regarding the status of the investigation after a plea deal had already been reached.
This document is an excerpt from a book detailing the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein in July 2006, specifically focusing on the perspective of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It describes the grand jury's decision to charge Epstein with a single count of solicitation, omitting charges related to minors, and notes the lack of notification to the police regarding his surrender and release on bail. The text also touches on Reiter's interactions with federal prosecutor Acosta.
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 178-179) from a book, likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich', included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. It details events in July 2006 involving 'Mary' (a victim), Detective Recarey, and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek regarding the decision to take the case to a Grand Jury. The text highlights Recarey's frustration with the legal strategy and the lack of communication from the State Attorney's office to the victim's family.
This document provides a chronological summary of legal proceedings associated with the Epstein case during a specific year, detailing allegations made by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Ghislaine Maxwell. It covers court filings in January, a federal judge's ruling in April regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and a defamation lawsuit filed by Roberts against Maxwell in September.
This document appears to be a screenshot or printout of a Palm Beach Post article headline written by Jane Musgrave on May 12, 2017. The article investigates the connections ('degrees of separation') between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number (022987).
This document describes Jeffrey Epstein's secretive and influential persona, his acquisition of wealth and properties, and his connections with prominent figures like Bill Clinton and Les Wexner. It details an event in 2002 where Epstein flew a group of scientists and TED participants, including the narrator, to Monterey on his private 727, accompanied by three young women, highlighting the luxurious and somewhat unsettling nature of the experience and hinting at a broader 'sex and money bromance' as reported by the New York Post.
This document excerpt details Jeffrey Epstein's involvement with massages, including 'happy ending massages' in Palm Beach, and his association with 'Jack Shacks' massage parlors. It describes how police were called after a massage parlor girl, identified as TK and 18 at the time, visited Epstein's house, and she subsequently provided names of other girls, some underage. The excerpt also mentions Epstein's 'widely touted association with Clinton'.
This page from a legal complaint outlines factual allegations regarding the damages suffered by Plaintiff Brunel due to Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct, including severe emotional distress requiring psychotherapy. It details the nature of Epstein's abuse of under-aged girls and asserts that press reports erroneously connected the Plaintiffs to these activities. The document also introduces allegations against Defendant Tyler McDonald and his company Yi.Org for hosting websites with false and disparaging information about the Plaintiffs starting in 2009.
This document is page 6 of a legal filing involving Plaintiff Brunel and his agency MC2, arguing that they have suffered severe financial damages and reputational harm solely due to their association with Jeffrey Epstein. It cites deposition testimony from Maritza Vasquez to claim Brunel was not involved in sex trafficking, details Brunel's inability to secure a U.S. visa, and states that MC2 went from being worth millions to being 'almost worthless.' The document references exhibits including visa documentation and a 2014 email from Jeff Fuller.
This document page outlines specific instances where the Plaintiffs (specifically MC2 and Brunel) lost business opportunities due to negative publicity linking them to Epstein's illegal activities. It details three examples involving photographer Michael Avedon, Modilinos Model Agency, and 1 Mother Agency, where relationships were severed or models refused to sign due to fears regarding these alleged associations.
This Daily Mail Online article from December 8, 2015, details Virginia's experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, starting when she was 17. She describes being flown to Britain to meet Prince Andrew, massaging Epstein, being paid for 'erotic massages,' and being trained to 'entertain' Epstein's friends and associates on his properties in New Mexico and the Caribbean. The article also mentions Virginia's use of Xanax provided by Epstein and her feelings of being 'special' and cared for by Epstein and Ghislaine, despite the exploitative nature of their relationship.
This document appears to be a cover page or separator sheet for a legal filing supplement in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It contains no body text, only the case header, a page number (3), and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document contains responses to legal interrogatories (questions 13-16) provided by attorneys Edwards and Cassell regarding their client, Jane Doe #3. It details that Jane Doe #3 began informing Brad Edwards of abuse allegations involving Dershowitz via phone calls starting in 2011 and filed a public affidavit in 2015. The attorneys state they have not seen photographic evidence of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz but are attempting to obtain such materials from the U.S. Attorney's Office.
This page is from a legal complaint (Case 1:15-cv-07433) filed on September 21, 2015. It outlines allegations of libel against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating she and her agent Gow made false statements with 'actual and deliberate malice' to discredit the plaintiff, Giuffre. The document asserts that these statements damaged Giuffre's professional reputation as the president of a sex trafficking non-profit and falsely accused her of lying about being recruited by Maxwell and abused by Epstein.
This document is a page (p. 311) from an academic text titled 'Morality Games,' discussing psychological and economic theories of reciprocity, self-image, framing effects, and anonymous giving. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a government investigation, likely collected due to the citation '(Rand & Epstein, 2014)' regarding altruism. The text analyzes why humans perform pro-social acts even when no reciprocation is possible, citing various evolutionary psychology studies.
This document is a page from an academic paper (Page 298) discussing moral psychology, specifically 'Attention to Motives' and 'Altruism Without Prospect of Reciprocation.' It cites various studies, including a 2014 paper by 'Rand & Epstein,' which is likely the reason for its inclusion in the House Oversight investigation files (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015510). The text uses the heroic death of Professor Liviu Librescu at Virginia Tech as an example of altruistic behavior.
This document is a news article from September 20, 2009, detailing various aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal situation and the reactions of his attorney and victims. It covers his jail time, probation, the sealing of documents, ongoing lawsuits, and the police investigation that led to charges of soliciting prostitution instead of more serious offenses.
This document is Page 2 of 2 of a printout from The Palm Beach Post website, dated April 6, 2011. The content consists almost entirely of website sidebar elements, including Facebook plugins, links to unrelated news stories (Japan tsunami, local politics), and advertisements (Yahoo ads, motorcycle listings). The only connection to the investigation is the URL in the footer ('.../0217epstein.html') suggesting the previous page contained an article about Epstein from February 2009, and the House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages) in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The text presents a legal argument regarding the standard for Summary Judgment under Florida law, citing various precedents to argue that the record establishes Edwards's conduct cannot create liability in favor of Epstein. The page bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013401.
This is page 6 of a legal motion in the case Edwards adv. Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's claims against attorney Bradley J. Edwards were frivolous because Epstein used the Fifth Amendment to avoid discovery ('sword and shield' doctrine) and because Edwards' conduct was protected by litigation privilege. It notes that Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims right before a summary judgment hearing.
Page 2 of a 'Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages' in the case of Edwards vs. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document argues that Epstein filed previous motions solely to intimidate Edwards and his clients into abandoning their claims. The bulk of the text outlines the 'Applicable Law' regarding the standard of proof required to plead punitive damages in Florida, citing various precedents to establish that the burden is lower than that for summary judgment.
This page from a legal document argues that a fact-finder should draw adverse inferences from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer specific deposition questions. It lists several unanswered questions regarding sexual assault allegations, contact with minors (L.M., Jane Doe, E.W.), and claims of fabricated cases by Mr. Edwards, proposing that his silence implies admission of guilt.
This page from a legal filing (page 19) argues that 'Edwards' is entitled to summary judgment because Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment. The document asserts that adverse inferences must be drawn from Epstein's silence, leading to the conclusion that he was a 'serial molester of children' rather than a victim of improper lawsuits. It cites Florida case law to support the argument that silence in civil cases can be used as evidence against a party.
This document is page 17 of a legal filing arguing that Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards should be dismissed under Florida's 'sword and shield doctrine.' The text details how Epstein is seeking money damages from Edwards while simultaneously invoking the Fifth Amendment to refuse answering basic discovery questions about his claims that Edwards 'ginned up' allegations or 'fabricated' cases. The filing cites multiple Florida precedents establishing that a plaintiff cannot seek relief while refusing to provide discovery.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
Notice to be provided if the US receives a FOIA request for this agreement.
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
Update on rapid Bitcoin price swings
A conversation between Epstein and the witness's mother is mentioned by Ms. Menninger as something that could be testified to by the mother herself.
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein'.
The speaker states that Epstein, not Ghislaine, called Annie's mom to arrange the trip.
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
The central subject of the document, an agreement whose scope and binding effect on other districts is being debated.
Questions regarding allegations Epstein contends Edwards 'ginned up' or 'fabricated'.
The speaker notes the absence of these records as evidence
Before the witness left, Epstein asked her to leave her phone number.
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity