SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013978.jpg
This document is page 119 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It captures a brief segment of direct examination testimony from an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), confirming she has testified many times regarding the impact of post-event information on memory. The page contains very little text as the testimony continues on the next page.
DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the scientific peer review process and her experience serving on editorial boards for psychology journals. The document appears to be part of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial records.
DOJ-OGR-00013964.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who testifies about her educational background at UCLA and Stanford, establishing her credentials in mathematics and psychology. The questioning focuses on the definition and contents of her Curriculum Vitae (CV) to lay the foundation for further expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00013890.jpg
This document is a single page (page 31 of 246) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text captures a brief exchange between the Marshal, Attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and the Judge regarding the readiness for a female individual waiting outside and an order to bring in the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013888.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a procedural discussion between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Judge regarding the use of electronic equipment to simulate a whiteboard for a jury demonstration because COVID protocols prevented the person ('she') from standing directly before the jury. The discussion centers on whether a picture of the digital drawing needs to be preserved for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) and Mr. Everdell (defense) before the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs intended to prove a 'continuing relationship' between a witness (pseudonym 'Jane') and the defendant. The Court rules to allow the evidence, citing that it is not prejudicial under Rule 403, while emphasizing the need to maintain the witness's anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00013879.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim requests that a male witness, who is quarantined with COVID-19, be allowed to testify via WebEx rather than traveling. Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach insists that the witness must be subject to cross-examination (rejecting a stipulation) and demands proof of a positive COVID test.
DOJ-OGR-00013867.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell discusses the plan to call a notary, Keith Rooney, to testify about authenticated land registry documents and records from a Mr. Grumbridge in London. The purpose of this evidence is to prove that Ghislaine Maxwell did not reside at a specific property prior to 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00013859.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on August 10, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). The document announces the filing of an official transcript for a conference held on December 10, 2021, and outlines the 7-day procedure for parties to request redactions of personal information before the transcript is made public.
DOJ-OGR-00013842.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense counsel argues that witnesses testifying for Ms. Maxwell require anonymity due to intense media attention and potential harassment. The Judge instructs the defense and prosecution (Ms. Moe) to confer, identify specific witnesses, and submit arguments if they cannot agree.
DOJ-OGR-00013841.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge schedules a charging conference for 'Saturday the 18th' and ensures Ghislaine Maxwell's presence. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises an issue regarding the defense case, stating that potential witnesses are requesting to testify anonymously or under name protection (pseudonyms).
DOJ-OGR-00013810.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of witness Janice Swain by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. Ms. Swain identifies herself as a 71-year-old sales representative with a high school education and three children.
DOJ-OGR-00013786.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on clarifying details regarding Jeffrey Epstein's anatomy and specific actions he took while in bed with the witness, amidst procedural objections from defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to remember Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.'
DOJ-OGR-00013745.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about the specifics of a massage given by Maxwell, specifically regarding physical contact with nipples and breast exposure. Farmer testifies that her entire breast was exposed and denies the defense's suggestion that she did not believe the encounter was explicitly sexual.
DOJ-OGR-00013677.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a brief recess during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The judge coordinates with attorneys Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger before recalling the witness and jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013612.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (age 42) by Ms. Pomerantz. The text includes judicial instructions regarding the relevance of testimony concerning 'illegal sexual activity' relative to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, and the introduction of Government Exhibit 13, which is noted as being under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg
Court document filed on August 10, 2022, notifying parties that an official transcript for a conference held on December 9, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell has been filed. The document outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00013590.jpg
This document is the final page (49 of 49) of a court transcript index filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witness Tracy Chapell by attorneys Mr. Rohrbach (Direct) and Mr. Everdell (Cross). It also indexes Government Exhibits 801-803 and Defendant Exhibit TC-1.
DOJ-OGR-00013532.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot), who testifies to meeting a specific person in September 2003 and a 'Jane' in November 1996, referencing his flight logbook for verification. The witness confirms he recalls no one else with that first name on Jeffrey Epstein's planes, after which he is excused, and the court adjourns for the day.
DOJ-OGR-00013505.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the case number). The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of Eva Dubin, her marriage to Glenn Dubin, and flights taken with her children, Selena and Jordan. Notably, the testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was Selena Dubin's godfather.
DOJ-OGR-00013483.jpg
This document is page 205 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by attorney Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on challenging Rodgers' memory of a meeting with a person named 'Jane' on November 11, 1996, establishing that the date is derived solely from flight logs which only list a first name—a name shared by others in Epstein's circle, including an assistant. The page concludes with the introduction of sealed exhibits LV3A and LV3B to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013482.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). Rodgers admits that his previous statement to the government—that he first met 'Jane' around 2000—was based on memory without researching his logbooks and was 'a couple of years off.' The attorney points out that flight logs from 1996, 1997, and 1998 show a passenger with Jane's first name, establishing an earlier connection than Rodgers initially recalled.
DOJ-OGR-00013412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on identifying a specific female passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's planes who is known to have attended Interlochen. The witness confirms the identity of this passenger by referencing Government Exhibit 12 without stating the name aloud.
DOJ-OGR-00013394.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Rodgers, identified as a pilot, testifies to the authenticity of their flight logbook, stating entries were made within 30 minutes of flights. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully moves to admit the logbook as evidence (Exhibit 662 under seal and 662-R redacted) with no objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity