This document is page 220 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It depicts the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, who attempts to introduce a prior deposition (Exhibit 3505-43) to refresh the witness's memory, while prosecutor Ms. Comey objects.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that a witness named Carolyn showed inconsistency by amending a prior answer to state she was 'transported via private car provided by Jeffrey Epstein,' which the judge allows into evidence. The page concludes with Ms. Sternheim requesting a recess and prosecutor Ms. Comey questioning the length of the cross-examination.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, confirming a specific incident where Jeffrey Epstein masturbated in her presence and paid her $300. The testimony also references a legal complaint filed against Epstein in federal court in 2009.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorneys Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Pagliuca discuss procedural matters with the Judge, including objections to the relevance of upcoming witness testimony and the estimated duration (1-1.5 hours) of Mr. Pagliuca's cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript captures the logistical coordination to ensure the jury is not left waiting.
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Judge ('The Court') and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach discuss a male witness who seemingly violated instructions by discussing his testimony with his sister. The Court orders the government to conduct a full investigation into this transgression and produce the facts to the defense by the end of the day.
This document is page 150 of 264 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures a brief moment where the Court dismisses the jury for a one-hour lunch break during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Most of the page is blank, indicating the end of a session or section.
This document is page 138 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness denies drinking alcohol or doing drugs and emphatically denies an allegation that Virginia Roberts approached her at a party about making $300. The witness confirms she first spoke to the FBI about Mr. Epstein in 2007. Attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey participate in the procedural handling of evidence binders.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies about her mental health, specifically mentioning a diagnosis of schizophrenia and the use of Vyvanse and Doxepine to manage symptoms, which include fears of her children being trafficked. The questioning aims to establish that despite her condition and medications, her ability to recall past events remains intact.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness identifies Government Exhibit 104 as a photograph of herself at age 14, taken when she visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. The exhibit is admitted under seal to protect her anonymity.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. During this segment, the witness identifies Government Exhibit 11 (GX-11) as her birth certificate and confirms her full name and date of birth listed on the document without stating them aloud. The defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, offers no objection to the proceeding.
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness confirms she requested to testify using only her first name for privacy and identifies 'Government Exhibit 11' as her birth certificate.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the end of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding technical details of how email clients populate messages when connected to the internet. Following the questioning, the Court excuses Mr. Flatley and dismisses the jury for a 15-minute break.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata of a Microsoft Word document (Exhibit 420B). The witness testifies that the document's author and 'last saved by' user are listed as 'gmax,' a digital alias associated with the defendant.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. Flatley identifies themselves as the CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) coordinator and a digital forensic examiner for the FBI with over 16 years of experience. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the testimony relative to Rule 702 (expert vs. fact testimony).
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey, regarding the admission of a photograph (Government Exhibit 343) found on a CD (logged as 1B63). The witness confirms the photograph depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and the judge admits the exhibit into evidence over an objection by defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding Government Exhibits 304 and 306. The witness identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in a photograph (Exhibit 304) and identifies Maxwell in another photo (Exhibit 306) retrieved from an investigation CD labeled '1B26'.
This document is page 1428 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between the Judge and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding whether witnesses were instructed not to confer with one another. Ms. Moe reveals that during a meeting the previous night, a witness named Brian admitted unprompted that he had been in communication with another individual named Jane.
Cover page of the official transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 7, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The document lists Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (US Attorneys) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
This is a court document filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). It serves as a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript regarding a conference held on December 6, 2021. The notice outlines the deadlines and procedures for parties to request redactions of sensitive personal data from the transcript before it becomes publicly available.
This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript, specifically from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the page numbers for the testimony of witnesses Kate, Patrick McHugh, Kelly Maguire, and Kimberly Meder, detailing the attorneys responsible for their direct and cross-examinations. The document also lists numerous government exhibits (series 223R-287R, 18, 109, 702) that were received into evidence.
This legal document, filed by the U.S. Government on June 22, 2022, provides background on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed co-conspirator (the defendant). It outlines the timeline of the investigation, starting in November 2018, and details the indictments against Epstein and the defendant, which involved the abuse of several victims identified as Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. The document asserts that the investigation was prompted by investigative journalism and not by civil litigants.
This document is the cover page for "The Government's Sentencing Memorandum" in the criminal case of the United States of America versus Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on June 22, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the legal counsel for the government, including U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and several Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. The letter confirms that the government has complied with a court order by notifying the six victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) of their rights to be heard at the upcoming sentencing on June 28, 2022, as stipulated by the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
This is a court order issued on June 21, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order corrects the contact information for Wendy Olsen, the Coordinator of the Victim Witness Unit, and establishes the procedure for victims who wish to make a statement at sentencing. Victims are required to submit a written statement by email to the Victim Witness Unit by noon on June 23, 2022, and must indicate if they also wish to make an oral statement.
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Conrad, by attorneys Mr. Gair and Mr. Schectman. The questioning focuses intensely on a letter Conrad wrote to attorney Mr. Okula, specifically her choice of postage stamp and her decision to capitalize the words "our government," probing her motivations and opinions about other individuals involved in the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity