SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00009260.jpg
This document is a transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' (2012), filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It features the testimony of a witness named Conrad, who admits to lying during jury selection (voir dire) before Judge Pauley to avoid being dismissed. Specifically, she failed to disclose a 2007 arrest in Winslow, Arizona, for disorderly conduct following a domestic dispute with her husband, and subsequently skipped her court date.
DOJ-OGR-00009224.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2014, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case, docket number 13-1388-cr, is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America, originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The page identifies the parties involved, their legal roles (Appellee, Defendants, Defendant-Appellant), and their respective legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00009191.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg
This document is page 46 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The Government argues that 'Juror 50' should be allowed to review his jury questionnaire before any potential hearing to consult with counsel regarding his Fifth Amendment rights. The text notes that Juror 50 does not recall answering questions about sexual assault and discusses procedural arguments regarding subpoenas and the scope of the inquiry.
DOJ-OGR-00009153.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing that the Court should personally conduct a narrow questioning of Juror 50 to investigate potential bias. The Government contends this approach is necessary to prevent juror harassment and protect the integrity of jury deliberations, citing numerous legal precedents where courts have similarly controlled such inquiries. The Government also argues against the defendant's request for "pre-hearing discovery" and calling other jurors as witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00009142.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 615) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's motion claiming juror bias, specifically discussing the legal standards for 'actual bias' versus 'implied' or 'inferable' bias in a post-trial context. The Government argues that actual bias is the only relevant inquiry and cites various legal precedents (Torres, Greer, Smith v. Phillips) to support the position that the defendant's arguments are unpersuasive.
DOJ-OGR-00009122.jpg
This document is the Preliminary Statement from a legal memorandum filed by the US Government on February 24, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has not met the heavy burden required to prove that a juror deliberately lied during voir dire or that the juror would have been struck for cause, citing legal precedents such as McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood. The filing requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion based on the present record.
DOJ-OGR-00009108.jpg
This document is the title page of an Amicus Curiae Brief filed on February 24, 2022, by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York. The filing attorneys listed are Abbe David Lowell and Christopher D. Man of Winston & Strawn LLP, and Joel B. Rudin of the Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00009099.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the 'Voir Dire' (jury selection) proceedings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal teams present for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus Sternheim and Stabile).
DOJ-OGR-00009083.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The juror denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. This section of the questionnaire is designed to identify potential conflicts of interest or bias among prospective jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009082.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 indicates they have no association with the New York City Police Department (NYPD) and no pre-existing opinions about the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, or former Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss that would impede their ability to be a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00009081.jpg
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 indicates they have no professional, business, or social associations with either the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
DOJ-OGR-00009007.jpg
This document is page vi of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 613), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The cases cited span from 1936 to 2018 and involve various parties in different U.S. federal and state courts.
DOJ-OGR-00009002.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2022. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00008976.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 24, 2022. The order approves the defendant's proposed redactions to court documents, finding they are necessary to protect juror anonymity and privacy. The court orders the parties to file the redacted briefs and other materials by February 25, 2022, and also states it will docket a motion from 'Juror 50'.
DOJ-OGR-00008972.jpg
This is a court order filed on February 18, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, rejecting specific redaction requests because the information constitutes legal arguments or is widely reported in the press. The document specifically lists page and line numbers in the Defense Brief where redactions were denied.
DOJ-OGR-00008965.jpg
This document is the third and final page of a legal filing (Document 603) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 16, 2022. The text argues against redacting publicly available materials from a briefing. The document is submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, with three other Assistant U.S. Attorneys listed, for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00008925.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00008922.jpg
This is the second page of a legal document filed on February 11, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, under Damian Williams, formally states that it does not seek any redactions to the questionnaires completed by the seated jurors. The document was submitted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey and copied to the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00008916.jpg
This document is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 11, 2022, in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is a response to a request from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) to file an amicus brief regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial. The judge sets a deadline of February 18, 2022, for any party to file such a motion and outlines four specific requirements that must be met for the court to consider it.
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
This is a court order filed on February 11, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denies the defendant's motion to seal all documents related to her motion for a new trial in their entirety, ruling that sealing must be narrowly tailored. The document also references a motion to intervene by 'Juror 50' and mentions that media organizations have requested the unsealing of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00019882.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Defense Motion) dated July 10, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense proposes a $5 million bond secured by UK property and co-signed by six individuals, along with strict home confinement in New York and GPS monitoring. The text argues that the alleged conduct is 25 years old and that Maxwell is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
DOJ-OGR-00019867.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, alleges that the defendant (implied to be Maxwell) encouraged victims to accept financial offers from Epstein and participated with him in grooming and abusing minors. It further claims the defendant lied under oath during a 2016 deposition in the Southern District of New York to conceal these crimes. The document then outlines the applicable law for detention under the Bail Reform Act, citing several legal precedents.
DOJ-OGR-00019866.jpg
This legal document provides background on a sealed indictment returned on June 29, 2020, against a defendant, identified as Maxwell. The charges, including conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors, stem from an alleged scheme with Epstein between 1994 and 1997 to sexually abuse underage girls at his properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico. The document details Maxwell's alleged role in identifying, grooming, and abusing the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00019865.jpg
This document is the first page of the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution argues that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk due to her wealth, three passports, foreign citizenship, and lack of ties to the US, and requests she be detained pending trial for her alleged role in partnering with Jeffrey Epstein to exploit minors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity