| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Blaine
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Giuffre
|
Witness corroborator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim trafficker |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. [REDACTED]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Colleen Mullen
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim witness |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
sender
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alan Ross
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiff's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
alex
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Gail E. Ferguson
|
Professional regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Pilot]
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Daniel Rose
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex [Government Official]
|
Subject of investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Joe
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ray
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Deceased Partner
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agent [REDACTED]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Academic |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (Deceased Partner)
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Blaine met Ms. [Redacted] through mutual friends. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief visit to Epstein's Palm Beach residence | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Stay at Epstein's Paris Apartment | Paris, France | View |
| N/A | N/A | Depositions/Testimony of alleged victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. [Redacted] provided information to New York Post journalist. | New York Post (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Abuse of Ms. [Redacted] by Jeffrey Epstein | Townhome in New York and Ca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged abuse of Ms. [Redacted] by Jeffrey Epstein. | New York Townhome and Virgi... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement Opt-out Period | N/A | View |
| 2021-09-28 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding subpoena compliance. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-03-17 | N/A | Third call from Ms. [Redacted] insistent on information. | Phone | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Follow-up call from Ms. [Redacted]. | Phone | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Initial call received by AUSA from a woman identifying as an Epstein victim. | Desk line (Phone) | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney received a call from a woman identifying as a former victim of Jeffrey Ep... | Phone call (Desk line) | View |
| 2020-03-09 | N/A | SDNY AUSA requests a meeting with Ms. [Redacted]. | New York (implied jurisdict... | View |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Meeting between Sigrid McCawley, her client (Ms. [Redacted]), and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. | New York (SDNY Building imp... | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed meeting between SDNY and Ms. [Redacted] | New York | View |
| 2020-01-20 | N/A | Proposed deadline for interview with client (Jeffrey Pop requested dates before this time). | Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates... | View |
| 2019-12-04 | N/A | Submission of a complaint referenced in the emails. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Ms. [Redacted] and prosecutors. | New York | View |
| 2019-08-19 | N/A | Witness Ms. [Redacted] formally refuses to be interviewed by the FBI. | Phone / Mobile | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Initial contact established with potential witness Ms. [Redacted]. | Phone / Mobile | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Video of Jeffrey Epstein sent to victim's YouTube account. | Online (YouTube) | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Agent served Ms. [Redacted] with a grand jury subpoena. | Florida (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Ms. [Redacted] served with a grand jury subpoena by an Agent. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Grand Jury Subpoena Service | Unknown (likely Florida giv... | View |
An email chain from October 2021 in which Jeffrey Epstein's brother (likely Mark Epstein) contacts government officials to request a copy of all records previously released to the New York Times regarding Jeffrey Epstein's case. The government officials discuss the request internally, noting that the brother needs to file a formal FOIA request with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), and coordinate who should handle the correspondence since some officials are 'no longer on the case.'
An email chain from October 2021 where Jeffrey Epstein's brother (likely Mark Epstein) requests copies of records released to the New York Times regarding Jeffrey's case. A government official responds, advising him to submit a FOIA request to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and offering to ensure the Civil Division receives a copy. The brother notes he is in Scotland until Thursday.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 involving a request from Jeffrey Epstein's brother (implied by context) for records previously released to the New York Times. Government officials advise the requester to submit a formal FOIA request to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to obtain these documents, noting that their specific division does not handle such requests directly.
This document is an email chain dated March 9, 2020, originating from attorney John Ray of Ray, Mitev & Associates (nicknamed 'Killer Bees'). The original email was sent to a redacted recipient ('Ms.') containing attached information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Subsequent emails in the chain show the recipients discussing forwarding this correspondence to the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
This document is an email chain from March 2020 between high-profile attorney Gloria Allred and an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The SDNY 'Epstein team' requested a call to provide updates and discuss Allred's clients. The correspondence arranges a conference call, which took place on March 26, 2020, where they discussed specific individuals (whose names are redacted) and Allred agreed to contact a specific woman despite not currently representing her in litigation.
An email thread from October 2021 between Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein's brother and next of kin) and a government official. Mark Epstein is requesting specific evidence regarding his brother's death at the MCC, including video footage from outside the SHU on August 9, 2019, lists of inmates on the tier, and incident reports explaining why the body was moved before the medical examiner arrived. The official advises him to submit a FOIA request to the Bureau of Prisons.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between USANYS officials and John Taylor, host of the 'Traffick Report Show'. Taylor provides evidence to the SDNY regarding an ambulance marked 'LSJ AMBULANCE' found on Little Saint James, alleging it was unregistered, lacked medical certification, and may have been smuggled into the USVI. Taylor also references drone footage from 'Rusty Shackleford' showing activity on the island prior to the SDNY raid and questions whether evidence was destroyed.
An email exchange from January 2020 between legal counsels regarding a case involving 'proffers' and a specific 'Ms. [Redacted]'. The top sender (likely prosecution) presses for a call regarding a client's recollection of an incident detailed in a December 4 complaint, while the bottom sender (likely defense) sends New Year greetings and notes they are out of the country until mid-January. The attachment '19_Civ._10788.pdf' suggests this relates to a 2019 civil case.
This document is an email chain from early 2021 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and other officials discussing repeated phone calls from a woman identifying herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The victim was seeking information and a follow-up from agents, noting her former attorney (who previously claimed to represent nine victims but stopped cooperating) was no longer representing her. The officials discuss coordinating an agent to reach out to her after multiple attempts.
An email chain from September 17, 2019, regarding the continued investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's collaborators. An Assistant Attorney General (likely from New Mexico, indicated by 'NMAG files') sends digital access credentials and a notification of physical evidence (CD) to a recipient (likely an Assistant U.S. Attorney). The email is then forwarded internally with a request to save the materials to an 'Epstein share'.
An email chain from August 13, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death (implied by the 'no open indictment' comment). Attorney Colleen Mullen coordinates a meeting for a victim/witness with prosecutors in New York and requests travel funding. Internally, USANYS staff discuss the logistical difficulty of funding witness travel to New York without an open indictment, suggesting investigators must travel to the witnesses instead.
This document contains a chain of emails from January 2020 between defense counsel and federal prosecutors (likely SDNY and FBI) negotiating a high-stakes 'proffer' meeting. The prosecutors express urgency, stating that 'offenses can be charged now,' and arrange a meeting for January 24, 2020, attended by the U.S. Attorney and FBI leadership, to hear the defense's presentation before charges are filed. The correspondence explicitly discusses a client (Ms. [Redacted]) and her recollection of observing Jeffrey Epstein engaged in sexual activity or observing other women in sexually suggestive circumstances.
This document is a letter from witness M. Rachel Zabala to the US Attorney's Office, dated July 28, 2019. Zabala submits a photograph she took on June 7, 2019, at 5th Ave and E 51st St in NYC, showing Jeffrey Epstein with a young female she perceived to be 14-16 years old. The witness notes Epstein was holding a Victoria's Secret bag and appeared romantically linked to the girl, prompting her concern.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between attorney Daniel Rose and an Assistant US Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The discussion concerns the safety and wellness of a crime victim (Ms. [Redacted]) represented by Rose. Rose reports escalating harassment from the media and notes a specific incident where an unknown individual sent a video of Jeffrey Epstein to the victim's YouTube account.
An email dated December 11, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta regarding the distribution of victim notification letters in the Epstein case. The sender reports calling a victim's attorney to ask where to send the letter; significantly, the sender notes that this attorney is paid for by Epstein. The attorney requested the letter be sent to him and attempted to inquire about its contents, which the sender refused to disclose.
An email dated September 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient (Ms.). The email concerns a subpoena served on the recipient's office regarding an upcoming criminal trial (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeframe). The attachment indicates the subpoena involves the Sacramento County Clerk.
This document is an email chain from March 9, 2020, originating from attorney John Ray of Ray, Mitev & Associates. Ray sent information regarding Jeffrey Epstein to a redacted recipient. Subsequent emails in the chain show the recipients discussing forwarding this correspondence to the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from February 17, 2006, details investigative activities conducted between May and July 2005 for case 1-05-000368. The report documents surveillance of Jeffrey Epstein's residence and aircraft, interviews with several individuals, and legal actions such as faxing subpoena requests for the phone records of Epstein and Haley Robson. The investigation also included a "trash pull" which yielded papers with names and phone numbers, indicating an ongoing effort to gather evidence and map connections between persons of interest.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness (Ms. [Redacted]) being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold raising objections. The questioning focuses on confirming that an attorney named Mr. Herman filed a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein on the witness's behalf and subsequently held a press conference. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp and a processing date of 07/26/17.
This is page 3 of a legal letter from Andrew G. Celli, Jr. representing Professor Dershowitz. The letter accuses opposing counsel of selectively leaking false charges to the Washington Post while withholding exculpatory emails from a redacted witness who allegedly tried to sell a story involving 'two presidential candidates, a former president, and one of the world’s leading entrepreneurs' to the New York Post. Celli demands a stipulation to unseal the witness's emails to allow for full public disclosure.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal team (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP) complaining that the plaintiff (Giuffre) leaked selective, confidential information to the Washington Post to damage Dershowitz. The letter attempts to discredit a specific redacted witness (Ms. [Redacted]) by citing her 2016 emails which contained outlandish conspiracy theories involving the CIA, 'the Russians,' and 'Special Agents Forces Men.' The document details the witness's claims of possessing compromising sexual evidence against high-profile figures including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Richard Branson, and Donald Trump.
This document is page 5 of a legal letter addressed to the Honorable Mark Filip on May 19, 2008, arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The text utilizes testimony from redacted witnesses to claim that no interstate commerce laws were violated, that the women lied about their ages (claiming to be 18), that no coercion or force was used, and that encounters were often non-sexual massages. It also critiques the conduct of federal prosecutors and the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement.
This document is a draft O-1 Visa support letter written by magician David Blaine for a redacted individual (referred to as 'Svet' in the text). Blaine lists his high-profile credentials and connections to world leaders to bolster his recommendation, praising the applicant's fundraising skills, specifically noting her work for 'children on the US Virgin Islands,' a location heavily associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
Emails where she mentions Dershowitz but does not allege trafficking or sex.
Notification regarding the settlement and opportunity to opt out.
Discussing testimony of a defense character witness who allegedly recruited the victim.
Requesting a call regarding compliance with a subpoena served on the recipient's office in connection with an upcoming criminal trial in SDNY.
Looking for follow-up; no substantive discussion.
Call to desk line identifying self as victim and former client of attorney.
Identified as victim and former client of Mr. [Redacted]; discussed attorney contact and NYPD contact.
Good afternoon, Ms. [Redacted] Please see annexed for your information.
Please see annexed for your information.
Sending attached correspondence from Clara Moran and a link/password to 'NMAG files'.
Email providing digital access (via link and password) and notice of physical delivery (CD via mail) of correspondence from Chief Deputy AG Clara Moran regarding the Epstein investigation.
Forwarding correspondence from Chief Deputy AG Clara Moran regarding the investigation. Includes a link to 'NMAG files', a password ('7e4DzyfvYC'), and notes a CD is coming via U.S. Mail.
Claims regarding 'the Russians', Anonymous, CIA hacking, and threats to release evidence against Clintons and Trump.
On February 14, 2006, at 12:06 pm, the investigator received a call back from Ms. [REDACTED] on voicemail, who left her number for a return call.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity