DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants served on RRA offices; 40+ boxes obtained by DOJ | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice seized 40+ boxes of documents from RRA offices | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice sequestered about 13 boxes of documents related to the Epstein case from RR... | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Department of Justice's practice of limiting plea agreements to specific USAOs ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Legal notice | The Department of Justice sent a notice advising that the Court was seeking letters from victims ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Department of Justice filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-18 | N/A | Filing of United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Anticipated production of Epstein FOIA documents to The Times. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of OPR investigation report concerning Epstein investigation | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of DOJ OPR report on Epstein investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding inmate death. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Just days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights... | Atlanta | View |
| 2018-05-10 | N/A | Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Publication revision | The U.S. Attorneys’ Manual (USAM) was revised and renamed the Justice Manual. | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Document production | This document is page 1 of a 95-page set produced in response to Public Records Request No. 17-295. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029626.jpg
This document is a printout of a Daily Beast article discussing a widened Justice Department and FBI probe into Jeffrey Epstein for child trafficking, specifically looking into his friend Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 modeling agency. It highlights that while Epstein cannot be prosecuted again for charges covered by his 2007 non-prosecution agreement (double jeopardy), new evidence or victims could lead to federal trafficking charges which carry a 20-year sentence. The article also criticizes the special treatment Epstein received, noting his high-profile connections and the failure to enforce mandatory psychological evaluations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029406.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from May 25, 2017, detailing facts supporting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. It outlines Jeffrey Epstein's history as a sex offender, his controversial 2008 plea deal involving the DOJ, and his connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. The text specifically describes a FOIA request submitted on April 20, 2017, by James Robertson of the National Enquirer, seeking FBI records regarding the investigation into Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014082.jpg
This document is page 103 of a 2014 legal article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that the CVRA protects victims' rights during the pre-charging phase of a criminal investigation and criticizes the Department of Justice for interpreting the law contrary to this view. The page is stamped as evidence from the House Oversight Committee (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014082), likely related to investigations into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement and the violation of victims' rights under the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
This document is a page from a legal journal (2014) analyzing Crime Victims' Rights (CVRA) and is part of a House Oversight Committee production. It specifically critiques the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein case, noting that while the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office initially notified victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) of their rights in June 2007, the Department later 'reversed course' regarding the applicability of the CVRA during litigation. The text highlights a specific letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña to a victim sent months before the nonprosecution agreement was signed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014067.jpg
This document is page 88 of a legal text (likely a law review article by Cassell et al., Vol 104) included in a House Oversight Committee production. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) and the Department of Justice's interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically regarding when a 'prosecution' officially begins and when victims can assert their rights. The text argues that the OLC's narrow interpretation—that prosecution only begins at indictment rather than complaint—is 'twisted' and contradicts standard criminal procedure definitions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014066.jpg
This document is page 87 of a 2014 legal academic article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) position that victims' rights only apply after charges are filed, citing the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a precedent where the court concluded the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application. The text argues that limiting rights to the prosecution phase renders the statutory words 'detection' and 'investigation' meaningless.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014058.jpg
This document appears to be page 79 of a 2014 legal analysis or law review article, included in a House Oversight Committee production (likely related to the Epstein investigation regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act). The text analyzes the 'Paletz' and 'Skinner' cases to argue that CVRA rights should apply during investigations, not just after conviction or charging. It critiques the Department of Justice's position by citing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, which found that limiting CVRA rights only to post-charging scenarios is inconsistent with the statute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014055.jpg
This document is page 76 of a legal article (Vol. 104) by Cassell et al., produced to the House Oversight Committee. It argues against the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text contends that the OLC incorrectly asserts that victim rights only attach after formal charges are filed, arguing instead that the Department of Justice is required by statute (VRRA) and policy to identify victims earlier, such as during the 'target letter' phase of an investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014042.jpg
This document is page 63 of a 2014 legal academic publication discussing Crime Victims' Rights. It argues for victim participation during criminal investigations, explicitly citing the 'Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case' as a primary example of why victims need rights before charges are filed. The text also provides historical context regarding the victims' rights movement, referencing the Warren Court and President Reagan's Task Force on Victims of Crime.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014041.jpg
This document is page 62 of a legal article (Cassell et al.) included in House Oversight records. It argues that Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) rights should attach before formal charges are filed, explicitly using the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement in Florida as a case study where victims were denied consultation because charges were not formally filed. The text critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) position and references a 2011 letter from Senator Jon Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder supporting the broader interpretation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014039.jpg
This document is page 60 of a legal article (Vol. 104) authored by Cassell et al. It contains an abstract and a Table of Contents discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The article critiques the Justice Department's interpretation of when victims' rights attach during criminal investigations, specifically using the Jeffrey Epstein case as a primary illustration of pre-charging issues.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021733.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a report or news article included in House Oversight files regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It profiles Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) Villafaña, praising her advocacy for victims and detailing a specific successful prosecution from 2006 involving Adam McDaniel, a Texas man who traveled to Florida to entice a 14-year-old minor. The document highlights the severity of the charges and the gratitude of the victim's parents toward the prosecutor.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021674.jpg
This document is a formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act request dated January 6, 2010, sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg on behalf of his client, Jeffrey Edward Epstein, to the FBI. The letter requests all records related to Epstein created between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. The document provides specific personal details about Epstein to facilitate the search, including his date of birth, place of birth, Palm Beach address, and Social Security Number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021671.jpg
This Daily Beast article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, highlighting the tension between local police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney (Barry Krischer). It discusses the involvement of Epstein's associate Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 agency in recruiting girls, the aggressive tactics of Epstein's legal team (including Alan Dershowitz) against police and victims, and the eventual non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges despite a draft indictment threatening 20 years in prison.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021561.jpg
This document is an informational brochure for the Victim Notification System (VNS) provided by the US Department of Justice and associated agencies. It explains how victims of federal crimes can register for and access information regarding their cases, defendant custody status, and court events via a toll-free number or website using a VIN and PIN. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021561', indicating it is part of a Congressional oversight production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021558.jpg
This document is a standard informational brochure from the FBI regarding the 'Help for Victims of Crime' program. It details the Victim Notification System (VNS), providing contact numbers and hours for victims to check on case status. It also includes a 'Limited Confidentiality Statement' warning victims that information shared with a Victim Specialist may be shared with FBI agents or the US Attorney's Office if it pertains to safety, emergencies, child abuse, or the investigation. The document includes blank fields for contact names and case numbers, indicating it is an unused or template copy found within the document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021465.jpg
An FBI investigative document dated May 25, 2007, recording that a Supervisory Special Agent serving as liaison to the DOJ Office of International Affairs provided a list of nations with extradition treaties with the United States. This suggests the investigation was considering the possibility of international flight or extradition issues regarding the subject of the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
An opinion article by Kimberley Strassel discussing a conflict between the DOJ/FBI and the House Intelligence Committee regarding a top-secret intelligence source used in the investigation of the Trump campaign. The article highlights Speaker Paul Ryan's support for Chairman Devin Nunes's subpoenas and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein's resistance to providing the information. The document bears a House Oversight footer stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012144.jpg
This document is a legal submission from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that the Florida State Attorney's Office has already investigated and charged Epstein as a 'local John' for soliciting prostitution, and that under the DOJ's 'Petite Policy,' federal prosecution is precluded following state action. The defense minimizes the allegations, asserting the women were over 16, acted voluntarily, and were not 'trolled' at high schools.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012138.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The letter argues that a new Grand Jury subpoena violates Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and asserts that the investigation in New York lacks the federal elements (internet luring, coercion, etc.) necessary for prosecution. The defense claims that three principal accusers (names redacted) have given sworn statements that contradict the prosecution's case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030251.jpg
This document excerpt, marked as House Oversight material, discusses the legal and political tensions surrounding the Mueller investigation into President Trump. It details the dismissal of FBI Director Andrew McCabe on March 16, 2018, as an alleged act of retaliation. The text analyzes the legal arguments regarding the indictment of a sitting president, citing opinions from the Office of Legal Counsel, Rudy Giuliani, and Alan Dershowitz (described as a Trump legal surrogate).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity