Ms. Comey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
15
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
38 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013403.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Rodgers testifies about a logbook containing initials 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) before the court breaks for lunch. After the jury leaves, defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises a procedural objection regarding the government's practice of referring to other flight passengers simply as 'and others' without naming them.
DOJ-OGR-00013395.jpg
A transcript page from a court proceeding dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The examination focuses on Government Exhibit 662 (GX-662), identified as a logbook containing a 'date' column. There is a brief confusion regarding whether to look at exhibit 661 or 662, which is resolved by Ms. Comey withdrawing the request for 661.
DOJ-OGR-00013394.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Rodgers, identified as a pilot, testifies to the authenticity of their flight logbook, stating entries were made within 30 minutes of flights. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully moves to admit the logbook as evidence (Exhibit 662 under seal and 662-R redacted) with no objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00013388.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning centers on Rodgers' recollection of conversations with Ms. Maxwell regarding the timeline of her residential moves after her father's death in November 1991. The transcript includes legal objections by another attorney, Mr. Everdell, on the grounds of foundation and hearsay, and subsequent rulings by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013386.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring a sidebar discussion during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues that evidence of Maxwell's father's death and her subsequent financial decline—followed by Epstein buying her a townhouse—establishes a financial motive for her participation in Epstein's crimes. The defense (Mr. Everdell) objects, claiming the events occurred three years before the alleged conspiracy and are irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00013385.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large apartment in Manhattan, located at 59th Street near Columbus Circle, and testifies that Ms. Maxwell moved from there to a studio apartment in late 1991 or early 1992. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding the relevance of the questioning, which is then debated in court.
DOJ-OGR-00013383.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The witness testifies about first meeting Ms. Maxwell in July 1991, describes her physical appearance and personality at the time, and states she was 'number two' below Jeffrey Epstein. The witness then positively identifies Ms. Maxwell, the defendant, in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00013337.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. The questioning establishes that the witness received phone calls from Epstein and Sarah Kellen, with Sarah calling on Epstein's behalf. The transcript also details the witness's first contacts with the U.S. government for this case, including a meeting in a Florida parking lot around January 4, 2021, and a subsequent phone/video meeting on January 13, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00013336.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn denies having any conversations with his ex-partner, Carolyn, about Jeffrey Epstein or his testimony. A new line of questioning begins by Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on whether Shawn recalls visiting a house in Palm Beach in 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013334.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies that he accompanied a girl named Carolyn (then 16) to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house multiple times, waiting outside for an hour while she went in alone. He states that she would emerge with money in hundred-dollar bills and admits that they were using drugs during this time period.
DOJ-OGR-00013333.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (inferred from context and case number). A witness named Shawn testifies about a photograph taken on a boat during Melissa's 16th birthday, identifying Carolyn, Melissa, and Candace. Shawn also testifies to accompanying Melissa to Jeffrey Epstein's house multiple times, noting that Melissa took a girl named Amanda there, which drew an objection from the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00013332.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. The witness identifies a photograph, Government Exhibit 105, as being from 'Melissa's 16th birthday' and names Carolyn, Melissa, and Candace as individuals in the photo. Following a request from the government's attorney, Ms. Comey, the court admits the exhibit into evidence under seal to protect the privacy of the individuals depicted.
DOJ-OGR-00013331.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about observing a girl named Melissa, who was sixteen at the time, visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house accompanied by a woman named Carolyn. The witness states that after staying inside for an hour, the two females emerged carrying money.
DOJ-OGR-00013329.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between attorneys and a judge. The discussion revolves around a procedural issue: whether the prosecution can refer to a person named Amanda Lazlo as a victim, given that her name was not previously disclosed to the defense as required by a court order. The attorneys debate the admissibility of testimony about Amanda from a witness named Carolyn the previous day, with Amanda's age (stated as 18) being a key point of contention.
DOJ-OGR-00013327.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn identifies two former girlfriends, Melissa and Amanda Lazlo, and confirms he dated them concurrently with a woman named Carolyn. Crucially, Shawn testifies that Amanda Lazlo was 15 or 16 years old the first time he saw her go to Jeffrey Epstein's house, and identifies Melissa's name in an exhibit listed under 'child name'.
DOJ-OGR-00013325.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn is being questioned by Ms. Comey regarding a girl named Carolyn. The testimony establishes that Carolyn was 14 years old, had a middle school education, and visited Jeffrey Epstein's house, where she encountered Maxwell (whose first name she could not pronounce).
DOJ-OGR-00013324.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness identifies Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph (Exhibit 112) and testifies about conversations with a person named Carolyn regarding interactions at Epstein's Palm Beach house involving Jeffrey, Sarah, and an unidentified woman. The page includes a procedural exchange where the judge corrects a ruling on a hearsay objection from 'sustained' to 'overruled'.
DOJ-OGR-00013318.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn is under direct examination by Ms. Comey regarding the location of Jeffrey Epstein's house on El Brillo Way and the socioeconomic difference between Palm Beach and West Palm Beach. The witness describes living with a woman named Carolyn in West Palm Beach and rarely visiting Palm Beach due to a lack of money.
DOJ-OGR-00013316.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by Ms. Comey. The testimony establishes that a woman named Carolyn met Jeffrey Epstein through Virginia Roberts, who was a schoolmate of the witness at Survivors Charter School. The witness identifies Virginia Roberts in a photograph (Government Exhibit 113) and mentions hanging out with Carolyn, Virginia, and Virginia's boyfriend, Tony Figueroa, in 2001, engaging in activities like driving around and smoking pot.
DOJ-OGR-00013314.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about his background, including growing up in West Palm Beach, attending Survivors Charter School, and having a girlfriend named Carolyn at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00013313.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It depicts the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Shawn identifies Government Exhibit 20 as a copy of his ID, and the defense attorney Ms. Sternheim voices no objection to the exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00013312.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the transition between witnesses, where Ms. Gill is excused and a new witness, testifying under the pseudonym 'Shawn,' is called by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The Court issues specific instructions to sketch artists not to draw Shawn's exact likeness to protect the anonymity of a previous witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013302.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Court and prosecutors Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of 'Exhibit 52' and the lack of further witnesses for it. The prosecution plans to submit a letter arguing for the exhibit's admission based on current evidence before the court goes into recess.
DOJ-OGR-00014685.jpg
This is the final page (page 7) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The proceedings are adjourned for the holidays until December 27, 2021. The Judge (The Court) discusses upcoming masking rules due to COVID-19 concerns and ensures supplies will be available, while Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim confirm they have no further matters to address.
DOJ-OGR-00014682.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding jury deliberations, specifically addressing a jury note declining an offer because they had plans, and confirming that a 'limiting instruction' was included with the transcript of witness 'Annie's' testimony provided to the jury. The court prepares to dismiss the jury for the day at 4:25 PM.
Cross-examination of Mr. Alessi
Ms. Comey responds to the Court, stating she didn't understand the defense's point about lacking an opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Alessi, as she recalls there was an extensive examination.
Argument regarding paragraph 39 of a complaint
Ms. Comey argues that a witness's testimony is consistent with the complaint's timeframe and that it was not legally necessary for the complaint to include every detail of alleged sex acts beyond 'fondling and masturbation'.
Government Exhibit 296
Ms. Comey questions Gregory Parkinson about the contents of Government Exhibit 296, a CD. Parkinson identifies it and describes its contents as video of a search warrant execution.
Request to seal discussion of witness's family details
Ms. Comey requests that if Mr. Pagliuca is going to discuss the details of Carolyn's family, the discussion should be held at side bar and under seal.
Government's rebuttal argument in the trial of Ghislaine ...
Ms. Comey begins the government's rebuttal by focusing the jury's attention on the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her alleged crimes of abusing children, specifically mentioning Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. She characterizes the defense's arguments as distractions and reaffirms that while the government has the burden of proof, it is appropriate to respond to the defense's theories.
Identification of individuals in photographs from the Eps...
Ms. Comey questions a witness who identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in two photographs (Exhibits 307 and 320), which are subsequently admitted into evidence by the court. The witness states the photos came from a CD reviewed during the investigation.
Objection to characterization of testimony
Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca's attempt to read testimony into the record, stating she does not believe it is inconsistent with prior testimony.
Motivation of witnesses testifying against Ghislaine Maxwell
Ms. Comey argues that the four witnesses against Ghislaine Maxwell testified for justice, not for financial gain. She posits that since they had already received large financial payouts, they had no monetary incentive to risk perjuring themselves in a federal trial.
Female passenger on Mr. Epstein's plane
Ms. Comey questions witness Mr. Rodgers about a female passenger on Mr. Epstein's plane who he understood attended Interlochen. She directs him to identify the passenger's name using Government Exhibit 12 without saying it aloud.
Carolyn's age and introduction to Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Carolyn, about her initial interactions with someone named Shawn. Carolyn states she told Shawn she was 17 but he learned she was turning 14 by attending her birthday party. Carolyn also testifies that Shawn led her to meet Jeffrey Epstein via his friends, Virginia Roberts and Tony Figueroa.
Introduction of prior consistent statements
Ms. Comey informs the court of her intention to question a witness about 'Jane's' prior consistent statements.
Massagers in Mr. Epstein's room
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Alessi, about the types, appearance, frequency of discovery, and location of massagers found in Mr. Epstein's room.
Direction to review Government Exhibit 14
Ms. Comey asks the Court to direct the jury to turn to Government Exhibit 14, specifically to a child's name and birth date entry.
Cleaning procedures after Mr. Epstein's massages.
Ms. Comey questions Mr. Alessi about what he cleaned up after Mr. Epstein's massages. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the time frame. Mr. Alessi explains that whether he cleaned up towels depended on if the massage therapist was a repeat visitor or a new person.
Cleaning procedures after Mr. Epstein's massages.
Ms. Comey questions Mr. Alessi about what he cleaned up after Mr. Epstein's massages. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the time frame. Mr. Alessi explains that whether he cleaned up towels depended on if the massage therapist was a repeat visitor or a new person.
Relevance of a photograph as evidence
Ms. Comey argues that a disturbing photograph displayed outside Mr. Epstein's bedroom contradicts the defense's argument that the defendant was unaware of Epstein's attraction to underage females due to a 'halo effect'.
Witness's relationship with Virginia Roberts and her conn...
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Shawn, about their acquaintance with Virginia Roberts. The testimony establishes they were schoolmates, met in 2001, and socialized with Roberts and her boyfriend, Tony Figueroa. It is also stated that an unnamed female met Jeffrey Epstein through Virginia Roberts.
Objection to document C4
Ms. Comey objects to the inclusion of document C4, arguing it was crafted by lawyers, not the witness, and would confuse the issues for the jury.
Missing Jurors
Asking if the Court has attempted to call the missing jurors.
Stipulation regarding authenticity of Government Exhibits...
Ms. Comey stipulates on the record that Government Exhibits 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 are true and correct copies of birth certificates from various state and county agencies.
Request for briefing schedule regarding cross-examination...
Ms. Comey informed the court that the government and defense counsel disagree on the propriety of certain cross-examination topics for government witnesses. She requested to submit a written briefing to avoid discussing sensitive information, such as past criminal convictions or identifying details of anonymized witnesses, on the public record.
Identification of Government Exhibit 332 and Virginia Rob...
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Meder, about a photograph (Government Exhibit 332) from a CD (logged as 1B26) that was reviewed as part of the Epstein and Maxwell investigation. She also asks if the witness is familiar with the appearance of Virginia Roberts.
Jury video screens
Ms. Comey noted that the jurors' screens in the jury box had been turned for a video presentation and thanked the courthouse staff for their help.
Proposed limiting instructions
At the court's request, Ms. Comey reads the proposed (but now withdrawn) limiting instructions for a video and a photo (Government Exhibit 250) into the record.
Proposed limiting instructions
At the court's request, Ms. Comey reads the proposed (but now withdrawn) limiting instructions for a video and a photo (Government Exhibit 250) into the record.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity