Ms. Comey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
15
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
38 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013403.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Rodgers testifies about a logbook containing initials 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) before the court breaks for lunch. After the jury leaves, defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises a procedural objection regarding the government's practice of referring to other flight passengers simply as 'and others' without naming them.
DOJ-OGR-00013395.jpg
A transcript page from a court proceeding dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The examination focuses on Government Exhibit 662 (GX-662), identified as a logbook containing a 'date' column. There is a brief confusion regarding whether to look at exhibit 661 or 662, which is resolved by Ms. Comey withdrawing the request for 661.
DOJ-OGR-00013394.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Rodgers, identified as a pilot, testifies to the authenticity of their flight logbook, stating entries were made within 30 minutes of flights. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully moves to admit the logbook as evidence (Exhibit 662 under seal and 662-R redacted) with no objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00013388.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning centers on Rodgers' recollection of conversations with Ms. Maxwell regarding the timeline of her residential moves after her father's death in November 1991. The transcript includes legal objections by another attorney, Mr. Everdell, on the grounds of foundation and hearsay, and subsequent rulings by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013386.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring a sidebar discussion during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues that evidence of Maxwell's father's death and her subsequent financial decline—followed by Epstein buying her a townhouse—establishes a financial motive for her participation in Epstein's crimes. The defense (Mr. Everdell) objects, claiming the events occurred three years before the alleged conspiracy and are irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00013385.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large apartment in Manhattan, located at 59th Street near Columbus Circle, and testifies that Ms. Maxwell moved from there to a studio apartment in late 1991 or early 1992. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding the relevance of the questioning, which is then debated in court.
DOJ-OGR-00013383.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The witness testifies about first meeting Ms. Maxwell in July 1991, describes her physical appearance and personality at the time, and states she was 'number two' below Jeffrey Epstein. The witness then positively identifies Ms. Maxwell, the defendant, in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00013337.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. The questioning establishes that the witness received phone calls from Epstein and Sarah Kellen, with Sarah calling on Epstein's behalf. The transcript also details the witness's first contacts with the U.S. government for this case, including a meeting in a Florida parking lot around January 4, 2021, and a subsequent phone/video meeting on January 13, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00013336.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn denies having any conversations with his ex-partner, Carolyn, about Jeffrey Epstein or his testimony. A new line of questioning begins by Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on whether Shawn recalls visiting a house in Palm Beach in 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013334.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies that he accompanied a girl named Carolyn (then 16) to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house multiple times, waiting outside for an hour while she went in alone. He states that she would emerge with money in hundred-dollar bills and admits that they were using drugs during this time period.
DOJ-OGR-00013333.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (inferred from context and case number). A witness named Shawn testifies about a photograph taken on a boat during Melissa's 16th birthday, identifying Carolyn, Melissa, and Candace. Shawn also testifies to accompanying Melissa to Jeffrey Epstein's house multiple times, noting that Melissa took a girl named Amanda there, which drew an objection from the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00013332.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. The witness identifies a photograph, Government Exhibit 105, as being from 'Melissa's 16th birthday' and names Carolyn, Melissa, and Candace as individuals in the photo. Following a request from the government's attorney, Ms. Comey, the court admits the exhibit into evidence under seal to protect the privacy of the individuals depicted.
DOJ-OGR-00013331.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about observing a girl named Melissa, who was sixteen at the time, visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house accompanied by a woman named Carolyn. The witness states that after staying inside for an hour, the two females emerged carrying money.
DOJ-OGR-00013329.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between attorneys and a judge. The discussion revolves around a procedural issue: whether the prosecution can refer to a person named Amanda Lazlo as a victim, given that her name was not previously disclosed to the defense as required by a court order. The attorneys debate the admissibility of testimony about Amanda from a witness named Carolyn the previous day, with Amanda's age (stated as 18) being a key point of contention.
DOJ-OGR-00013327.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn identifies two former girlfriends, Melissa and Amanda Lazlo, and confirms he dated them concurrently with a woman named Carolyn. Crucially, Shawn testifies that Amanda Lazlo was 15 or 16 years old the first time he saw her go to Jeffrey Epstein's house, and identifies Melissa's name in an exhibit listed under 'child name'.
DOJ-OGR-00013325.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn is being questioned by Ms. Comey regarding a girl named Carolyn. The testimony establishes that Carolyn was 14 years old, had a middle school education, and visited Jeffrey Epstein's house, where she encountered Maxwell (whose first name she could not pronounce).
DOJ-OGR-00013324.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness identifies Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph (Exhibit 112) and testifies about conversations with a person named Carolyn regarding interactions at Epstein's Palm Beach house involving Jeffrey, Sarah, and an unidentified woman. The page includes a procedural exchange where the judge corrects a ruling on a hearsay objection from 'sustained' to 'overruled'.
DOJ-OGR-00013318.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn is under direct examination by Ms. Comey regarding the location of Jeffrey Epstein's house on El Brillo Way and the socioeconomic difference between Palm Beach and West Palm Beach. The witness describes living with a woman named Carolyn in West Palm Beach and rarely visiting Palm Beach due to a lack of money.
DOJ-OGR-00013316.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by Ms. Comey. The testimony establishes that a woman named Carolyn met Jeffrey Epstein through Virginia Roberts, who was a schoolmate of the witness at Survivors Charter School. The witness identifies Virginia Roberts in a photograph (Government Exhibit 113) and mentions hanging out with Carolyn, Virginia, and Virginia's boyfriend, Tony Figueroa, in 2001, engaging in activities like driving around and smoking pot.
DOJ-OGR-00013314.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about his background, including growing up in West Palm Beach, attending Survivors Charter School, and having a girlfriend named Carolyn at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00013313.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It depicts the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Shawn identifies Government Exhibit 20 as a copy of his ID, and the defense attorney Ms. Sternheim voices no objection to the exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00013312.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the transition between witnesses, where Ms. Gill is excused and a new witness, testifying under the pseudonym 'Shawn,' is called by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The Court issues specific instructions to sketch artists not to draw Shawn's exact likeness to protect the anonymity of a previous witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013302.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Court and prosecutors Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of 'Exhibit 52' and the lack of further witnesses for it. The prosecution plans to submit a letter arguing for the exhibit's admission based on current evidence before the court goes into recess.
DOJ-OGR-00014685.jpg
This is the final page (page 7) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The proceedings are adjourned for the holidays until December 27, 2021. The Judge (The Court) discusses upcoming masking rules due to COVID-19 concerns and ensures supplies will be available, while Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim confirm they have no further matters to address.
DOJ-OGR-00014682.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding jury deliberations, specifically addressing a jury note declining an offer because they had plans, and confirming that a 'limiting instruction' was included with the transcript of witness 'Annie's' testimony provided to the jury. The court prepares to dismiss the jury for the day at 4:25 PM.
Identification of Government Exhibit 52
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Alessi, about a physical exhibit (GX-52), which he identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein.
Rebuttal to defense's claim of witness manipulation by th...
Ms. Comey argues that there is no evidence to support the defense's claim that the FBI manipulated witnesses. She states that all witnesses testified they were only asked to tell the truth and that for the defendant to be innocent, multiple witnesses must have lied.
Cross-examination of Mr. Alessi
Ms. Comey responds to the Court, stating she didn't understand the defense's point about lacking an opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Alessi, as she recalls there was an extensive examination.
Argument regarding paragraph 39 of a complaint
Ms. Comey argues that a witness's testimony is consistent with the complaint's timeframe and that it was not legally necessary for the complaint to include every detail of alleged sex acts beyond 'fondling and masturbation'.
Government Exhibit 296
Ms. Comey questions Gregory Parkinson about the contents of Government Exhibit 296, a CD. Parkinson identifies it and describes its contents as video of a search warrant execution.
Request to seal discussion of witness's family details
Ms. Comey requests that if Mr. Pagliuca is going to discuss the details of Carolyn's family, the discussion should be held at side bar and under seal.
Government's rebuttal argument in the trial of Ghislaine ...
Ms. Comey begins the government's rebuttal by focusing the jury's attention on the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her alleged crimes of abusing children, specifically mentioning Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. She characterizes the defense's arguments as distractions and reaffirms that while the government has the burden of proof, it is appropriate to respond to the defense's theories.
Identification of individuals in photographs from the Eps...
Ms. Comey questions a witness who identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in two photographs (Exhibits 307 and 320), which are subsequently admitted into evidence by the court. The witness states the photos came from a CD reviewed during the investigation.
Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics
Requesting a ruling on whether juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors can be used in cross-examination.
Scheduling/Adjournment
Stating there is nothing further to take up and they will keep the defense informed.
Evidence Authentication and Cross-Examination
Discussion regarding stipulations on evidence, specifically birth certificates and a prior sworn statement, and upcoming discussions on cross-examination limits.
Rule 48 application to dismiss the Epstein indictment
Ms. Comey confirms the legal necessity to abate proceedings due to Epstein's death but clarifies that the investigation into coconspirators continues.
Jurisdiction over investigation into Mr. Epstein's death
Ms. Comey argues to the Court that an investigation into Mr. Epstein's death is already being conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI, and that it is not within the court's purview to conduct a separate, independent investigation.
Identification of underage females
Questioning regarding the identity of two females seen at Epstein's Palm Beach house.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding building layout and identification of exhibits.
Redirect Examination regarding binders and CDs
Ms. Comey attempts to ask Ms. Meder about specific initials seen on black binders and dates seen on CDs. Ms. Menninger objects on grounds of hearsay. The Court sustains the objections.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding the frequency of visits to Zorro Ranch and identification of photos of the property.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity