Minor Victim-3
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Groomer victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Alleged victim perpetrator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Exploitative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Perpetrator victim alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Criminal conspiracy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial criminal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abusive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Recruiter victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Victim accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Accused abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Groomer recruiter to victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Alleged groomer victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Milestone | Minor Victim-3 turned 25 before 2003, making a substantive count based exclusively on conduct inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Minor Victim-3 | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Crime | MAXWELL encouraged Minor Victim-3, who was under 18, to provide massages to Epstein in London, kn... | London, England | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim-3 during massages that MAXWELL encouraged. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | Alleged instances of sexual abuse took place over a three-year period beginning approximately 27 ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Minor Victim-3 traveled to the United States. | United States | View |
| N/A | Grooming | MAXWELL groomed and befriended Minor Victim-3, knowing she was under the age of 18. | London, England | View |
| N/A | Crime | Alleged sex acts between Epstein and Minor Victim-3. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | MAXWELL encouraged Minor Victim-3, then under 18, to provide massages to Epstein, knowing Epstein... | London, England | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and sexual abuse | JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited multiple minor victims (Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, Min... | Manhattan, New York; Palm B... | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim-3 during massages that were arranged and encouraged by MAXWELL. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conspiracy | The defendant allegedly participated in a conspiracy by recruiting and grooming Minor Victim-3 to... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial where Minor Victim-3 is expected to testify about her subjective experience of the allege... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grooming | MAXWELL groomed and befriended Minor Victim-3 while she was under the age of 18. | London, England | View |
| N/A | Introduction | MAXWELL introduced Minor Victim-3 to Epstein and arranged multiple interactions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | Minor Victim-3 was abused by Epstein in the United States. | United States | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Minor Victim-3 provided massages to Epstein, during which he sexually abused her. MAXWELL was awa... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | The defendant is charged with conspiring to transport and entice minors for the purpose of sexual... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grooming | MAXWELL groomed and befriended Minor Victim-3 while knowing she was under 18. | London, England | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Epstein sexually abused Minor Victim-3 during massages that MAXWELL encouraged her to provide. | London, England | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal act | The defendant's alleged efforts to recruit and encourage Minor Victim-3 to engage in sex acts wit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding / testimony | Victims are expected to testify about sexual abuse. The Government has requested that Minor Victi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Facilitation of abuse | MAXWELL encouraged Minor Victim-3 to provide massages to Epstein, knowing Epstein intended to sex... | London, England | View |
| N/A | Grooming | MAXWELL groomed and befriended Minor Victim-3. | London, England | View |
| N/A | Crime | Allegations of a conspiracy involving grooming a minor girl (Minor Victim-3) to engage in sex act... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020742.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court indictment filed on March 29, 2021, detailing allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding the grooming of minors. It specifically outlines the grooming of 'Minor Victim-1,' who was approximately 14 years old when met by Maxwell. The text describes how Maxwell and Epstein befriended the victim between 1994 and 1997 via shopping trips and movies, asked personal questions, and normalized nudity to facilitate sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00020441.jpg
This document is a log of court filings and orders from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between November 3 and November 8, 2021. The entries detail procedural matters ahead of her trial, including Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders on motions for reconsideration, jury selection logistics, and deadlines for witness-related briefings. The filings also concern motions to exclude evidence related to an alleged victim and the government's response to defense motions.
DOJ-OGR-00002357(2).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, discusses a July 2016 deposition of Maxwell. It states that a superseding indictment alleges Maxwell committed perjury during this deposition by providing false testimony about her knowledge of sexual activities at Epstein's Palm Beach house. The document notes that a district court had previously compelled her testimony over privacy objections, believing a protective order was sufficient.
DOJ-OGR-00002316.jpg
This is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 124) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. The defense argues that the indictment is unconstitutionally vague because it uses interchangeable terms for victims (e.g., 'Minor Victim-1' vs 'girls') and fails to provide specific dates or locations for alleged crimes occurring 27 years prior. The text lists specific vague allegations such as 'befriend,' 'groomed,' and 'took Minor Victim -2 to a movie' to illustrate the difficulty in preparing a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002316(1).jpg
This legal document, part of a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues that the indictment against her is unconstitutionally vague. It claims the inconsistent use of terms like "minor victims" and "girls," combined with a lack of specific dates for alleged crimes from decades ago, prevents Maxwell from preparing an adequate defense. The filing asserts this vagueness makes it impossible to investigate the allegations or challenge the prosecution's evidence effectively at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00019485.jpg
This page of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell details specific allegations of abuse and recruitment. It charges that in 1996, Maxwell personally gave an unsolicited massage to a topless minor in New Mexico, and between 1994-1995, encouraged another minor to massage Jeffrey Epstein in London knowing abuse would occur. It also introduces 'Count Four,' charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019482.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against an individual named MAXWELL, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines specific allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation of three unnamed minors (Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3) between 1994 and 1997. The alleged crimes, which involved a co-conspirator named Epstein, took place in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London, England.
DOJ-OGR-00019480.jpg
This legal document alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell groomed and befriended a minor, referred to as Minor Victim-3, in London between 1994 and 1995. Maxwell introduced the victim to Epstein and encouraged her to perform massages, knowing Epstein would sexually abuse her, which he subsequently did. The document further alleges that in a 2016 deposition for a civil case, Maxwell provided false statements under oath to conceal her role in facilitating the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00019478.jpg
This document is a page from an indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It describes how Maxwell enticed minor victims, specifically 'Minor Victim-1' (age 14), between 1994 and 1997. The text outlines grooming tactics used by Maxwell and Epstein, including shopping trips and movies, as well as Maxwell normalizing sexual abuse by undressing in front of the victim and being present during abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00019218.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020. It details specific allegations of abuse, including Maxwell providing a massage to "Minor Victim-2" in 1996 and encouraging "Minor Victim-3" to massage Epstein between 1994-1995 with knowledge of his abusive intent. The document also outlines Count Four, charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019215.jpg
This page from a legal indictment, filed on July 2, 2020, details several allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges state that between 1994 and 1997, MAXWELL, in concert with Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse of three minors (Minor Victim-1, -2, and -3) across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The specific allegations include participating in group sexual encounters, enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and facilitating sexual abuse by encouraging a minor to provide massages to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019213.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell groomed and facilitated the sexual abuse of a minor, "Minor Victim-3," by Epstein in London between 1994 and 1995. The document also states that Maxwell later attempted to conceal her conduct by providing false statements under oath during a 2016 deposition for a civil litigation case.
DOJ-OGR-00019185.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing specific allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges describe her involvement with Epstein in the sexual abuse and exploitation of three minors between 1994 and 1997. The alleged criminal acts, including group sexual encounters and enticement to travel for sex acts, occurred in New York, Florida, and London, England.
DOJ-OGR-00019183.jpg
This document page, filed on July 2, 2020, details allegations that Ghislaine Maxwell groomed a minor (Minor Victim-3) in London between 1994 and 1995, facilitating sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how Maxwell encouraged the victim to perform massages knowing they would lead to sexual acts. Additionally, it introduces a count regarding Maxwell providing false statements under oath during a 2016 civil deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00003142.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, is a memorandum from the Government arguing that it has provided the defense with sufficient discovery information for trial. The Government contends that details about three minor victims and related private plane flights are adequate, and that providing more specific information about events from over two decades ago would constitute premature 'Jencks Act' production. A footnote clarifies that one of the victims, 'Minor Victim-3', was 17 years old at the time of the alleged events.
DOJ-OGR-00003130.jpg
This document is page 196 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues for the admissibility of evidence regarding 'Minor Victim-3' to demonstrate the defendant's intent and modus operandi, citing legal precedents (McDarrah, Brand). It also argues that the defendant's motion to dismiss Counts One or Three based on multiplicity is premature under Second Circuit precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00003129.jpg
This document is page 195 of 239 from a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues for the admissibility of evidence regarding 'Minor Victim-3' under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404(b), stating that the defendant's grooming patterns were idiosyncratic and that the evidence is not unfairly prejudicial compared to the charges involving Victims 1 and 2. It explicitly states the defendant witnessed and participated in the abuse of victims at the hands of Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00003128.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) arguing for the admissibility of evidence under Rule 404(b). It details the defendant's 'modus operandi' of befriending minors (specifically Minor Victim-3), normalizing sexual topics, and arranging travel to facilitate sexual acts with Epstein. A footnote addresses the defense's anticipated argument regarding lack of knowledge or intent.
DOJ-OGR-00003125.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, is a government response in a criminal case. The prosecution argues that evidence concerning 'Minor Victim-3' is admissible to prove a conspiracy, even though a direct charge based on her testimony is time-barred because she turned 25 before 2003. The government asserts that the charges remain timely due to the involvement of 'Minor Victim-1' and 'Minor Victim-2' and distinguishes the current case from a cited precedent (*Hsia*) by stating the alleged conduct, grooming a minor for Jeffrey Epstein, is central to the conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00003124.jpg
This document is page 190 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The Government argues against striking allegations related to 'Minor Victim-3,' asserting that her testimony regarding grooming and sex acts in London is probative of the defendant's intent and the conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein, even if potential statute of limitations issues exist for specific charges. The document emphasizes that the evidence establishes the relationship between the defendant and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00003123.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on April 16, 2021, argues that the indictment against the defendant is valid. The prosecution asserts that the defendant's alleged actions of recruiting and grooming 'Minor Victim-3' for 'Epstein' constitute sufficient evidence of participation in a conspiracy, even if the substantive crime of transporting a minor was not completed. A footnote addresses a defense objection to the term 'abuse,' noting that while Minor Victim-3 may have been over the age of consent in the United Kingdom for some acts, she will testify to the traumatic nature of the experience.
DOJ-OGR-00003122.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing against a defendant's motion to strike allegations concerning 'Minor Victim-3'. The prosecution asserts that evidence regarding this victim is relevant and admissible for proving the conspiracies charged in Counts One and Three involving Epstein, citing established conspiracy law.
DOJ-OGR-00003118.jpg
This page is from a Government legal filing (Document 204, filed April 16, 2021) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against the defendant's motion to dismiss counts 1-4 and specifically opposes the motion to strike references to 'Minor Victim-3' from the indictment. The prosecution asserts that interactions between the defendant, Epstein, and Minor Victim-3 were part of the broader conspiracy to entice and transport minors, even if specific acts involving this victim might be time-barred as substantive charges.
DOJ-OGR-00003016.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing that there was no due process violation regarding the timing of an indictment. The Government contends that the delay was justified because two critical witnesses, Minor Victim-1 and Minor Victim-3, only came forward to be interviewed in August and September 2019, less than a year before the indictment was sought in June 2020. The document cites legal precedents to support the position that delays caused by witness unavailability are permissible and that prosecutors can wait until an investigation is complete before seeking charges.
DOJ-OGR-00003009.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the admissibility of certain evidence in the case against Epstein. It cites multiple legal precedents establishing that proof of lawful conduct on some occasions is irrelevant to disproving a specific criminal charge. The document applies this to the Epstein case, asserting that a prior investigation's findings about his conduct in the 2000s are irrelevant to the current charges from 1994-1997, and notes that two key victims were only interviewed for the first time in late 2019.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | Minor Victim-3 | $0.00 | Reference to 'paid sex acts' and 'commercial se... | View |
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Email Chain
Email Chain between Jeffrey Epstein and Minor Victim-3# (GX-406)
Unknown
Email Chain between Jeffrey Epstein and Minor Victim-3 (GX-406)
Scheduling appointment
Scheduling appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein; Employee-2 was in NY calling FL.
Scheduling appointment
Scheduling appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein.
Scheduling appointment
Scheduled appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein.
Scheduling appointment
Scheduled appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
No Subject
Scheduling appointment for sex acts with Epstein (Call placed to Florida).
No Subject
Scheduling appointment for sex acts with Epstein.
Grooming
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with Minor Victim-3.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity