| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
This document is an Opinion and Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan addresses the defendant's renewed motion for release on bail pending trial, ultimately indicating that the new information solidifies the Court's view that the defendant remains a flight risk.
A legal letter dated December 30, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter confirms that neither the prosecution nor the defense proposes any redactions to the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
This document is a letter filed on December 30, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors inform the court that, after conferring with the defense, both parties agree that no redactions are necessary for the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. Consequently, they have no objection to the order being filed publicly in its entirety.
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the criminal case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 23, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a reply memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. It lists her attorneys from three different law firms located in New York and Denver.
This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum' filed on December 23, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing is in support of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 23, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants the Defendant's request to file certain materials related to her bail application with redactions, as the Government did not oppose them. The Court found that the proposed redactions satisfy the legal test for balancing the public's right to access against privacy interests and judicial efficiency.
A court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order approves Maxwell's request to redact portions of her reply to the Government's opposition regarding her renewed bail application, citing legal standards for privacy and judicial efficiency.
This document is a formal letter from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer describes her personal victimization by Maxwell and argues that Maxwell is a flight risk, lacks empathy or remorse, and exhibits psychopathic behavior.
This document is the first page of the Government's memorandum opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, filed on December 18, 2020, in the SDNY. The Government argues that Maxwell remains a serious flight risk due to her extensive financial resources and foreign ties, citing the Court's previous denial of bail on July 14, 2020. The prosecution asserts that the new defense motion merely repackages old arguments and offers financial details the Court previously deemed irrelevant to the flight risk determination.
This document is a sworn affidavit and waiver of extradition from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Maxwell affirms her identity as the defendant, states her triple citizenship (US, UK, France), and confirms she is incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She attests to having reviewed the charges and her extradition rights under various international treaties with her legal counsel from Cohen & Gresser, LLP.
This document is an Affidavit and Waiver of Extradition filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on December 14, 2020. In it, Maxwell confirms her citizenship (US, UK, France), her residence in the US since 1991, and her incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She acknowledges reviewing the charges with her legal counsel from Cohen & Gresser, LLP, and indicates an understanding of her rights regarding extradition treaties between the US and the UK.
This document is a sworn affidavit and waiver of extradition from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In it, Maxwell states her citizenship (US, UK, France), her current incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, and confirms she has reviewed the indictment with her lawyers, Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell. She also acknowledges being informed of her rights regarding extradition under various treaties between the U.S., France, and the EU.
This document is a sworn affidavit from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the affidavit, Maxwell confirms her identity, her citizenship in the US, UK, and France, and her incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She attests that she has reviewed the indictment with her lawyers and understands her rights concerning a potential extradition request from the United States to the United Kingdom.
This document is a confidential letter dated November 17, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, advocating for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The anonymous author attests to Maxwell's good character, offers a $2,000 bond, and describes a long-standing relationship with Maxwell and her family, arguing against flight risk and highlighting severe confinement conditions.
This is a character reference letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 28, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail request. The anonymous author, a family friend since age 15, describes the Maxwell family dynamic, characterizing Robert Maxwell as narcissistic and controlling while praising Ghislaine's work ethic, intelligence, and caring nature. The letter details the author's long-term relationships with various Maxwell siblings and the mother, Betty Maxwell, noting the author wrote a book for Betty prior to her death in 2013.
A character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The author, whose name is redacted, describes a 30-year friendship with Maxwell, noting her academic success at Oxford and honesty. The author details two specific trips to the US in February 2013 and December 2018 where they and their son stayed with Maxwell in New York and another redacted location, asserting they never witnessed inappropriate behavior.
This document is a letter dated November 30, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, providing a character reference for Ghislaine. The author, whose name is redacted, describes a lifelong friendship with Ghislaine, highlighting her positive qualities, shared interests, and dedication to the non-profit TerraMar Project for ocean protection.
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a memorandum in support of a renewed motion for bail for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the case name as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and identifies her legal counsel from three different law firms.
This document is a legal cover letter dated December 8, 2020, from attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys are submitting a Renewed Motion for Bail under seal, providing both an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for public filing to protect privacy and confidential financial information. The document references previous correspondence and protective orders governing discovery materials.
This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on December 14, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants Maxwell's request to file her renewed bail application with redactions, as the government did not oppose it. The Court finds that the redactions are justified under the three-part test established in the Second Circuit case *Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga*, determining that the motions are judicial documents and that privacy interests outweigh the presumption of public access in this instance.
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 7, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, establishes page limits for filings (40 pages for motion/response), and grants permission for the Government to file submissions under seal with redactions.
This legal document is a letter dated November 23, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter provides an update on the confinement conditions of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), specifically that she was placed in quarantine after a staff member tested positive for COVID-19. The letter details that Maxwell tested negative, outlines the protocols for her quarantine including access to legal calls and discovery materials, and confirms she is being monitored by medical staff.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a deadline extension for electronic discovery in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government cites delays with an outside vendor processing data from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2019. The letter details the volume of discovery produced so far (350,000+ pages) and outlines the timeline of data seizure, privilege review by Epstein's estate, and subsequent warrant acquisition.
This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government requests to delay the disclosure of certain photographs and documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's victims until eight weeks before trial to protect an ongoing investigation. The Government argues these materials concern abuse occurring after the indictment period (post-1997) and are not exculpatory regarding the charges against Maxwell for the 1994-1997 period.
This document is an affidavit of certification filed on October 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey attests that the government attempted to negotiate with Maxwell's defense counsel to delay the disclosure of materials concerning victims of Jeffrey Epstein, but the defense refused to consent, leading to an inability to reach an agreement. The affidavit is filed pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 16.1 to certify this impasse to the court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity