United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019864.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330 AJN), filed in the Southern District of New York. It lists Audrey Strauss as the Acting U.S. Attorney and identifies Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey as Assistant U.S. Attorneys handling the case. The header indicates the document was originally filed on July 2, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019746.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' entered on March 22, 2021. The document lists the legal counsel for both the defense and the prosecution (Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz) and notes that Maxwell's bail disposition is 'Committed'.
DOJ-OGR-00017350.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, as well as the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00017334.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017305.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, with the Honorable Alison J. Nathan presiding as District Judge. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00010750.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated June 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter from the defendant regarding her access to legal materials needed for sentencing preparation at the MDC. The Court confirms with the MDC Warden that Maxwell has been given access to documents and a writing implement and orders the Government to follow up with the Warden and report back to the Court by 2:00 p.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010749.jpg
This is a court order issued on June 26, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was referenced in a letter from the Defendant but had not been received by the Court. The judge orders the Government to officially docket this motion by midnight on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010748.jpg
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 25, 2022. The order requires the parties to submit their positions regarding a motion filed by Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein (Dkt. No. 675) by 10:00 a.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010744.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order addresses the rights of victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to be heard at sentencing. The court grants the request for three individuals, Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, to make oral statements at the sentencing, noting that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, does not object to their inclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00010729.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 26, 2022, regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution states that, in response to a court order, they have confirmed with the Metropolitan Detention Center's Warden and Chief Psychologist that the defendant has full access to her legal documents and counsel. Consequently, the government argues there is no reason to postpone her sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010727.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning an application by Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to speak at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter references a previous order where the Court declined to allow individuals not proven at trial to be directly harmed to speak at the hearing, instead permitting them to submit written statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010713.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by Robert Y. Lewis, the attorney for victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Lewis outlines his communications with the probation office between May 9 and May 31, 2022, to arrange the submission of Victim Impact Statements for Maxwell's upcoming sentencing. The declaration supports a motion for his clients to speak at the sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010692.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum filed on June 25, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorneys from Marsh Law Firm PLLC, on behalf of crime victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, are petitioning the court to allow their clients to deliver oral victim impact statements at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The memorandum argues that the court should consider the full scope of harm caused by Maxwell's crimes, beyond the specific counts for which she was convicted.
DOJ-OGR-00010672.jpg
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, counsel for Maria Farmer, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, providing a victim impact statement for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. Maria Farmer details how Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein trafficked, assaulted, and threatened her in 1996 on the Wexner estate, leading to the destruction of her career, health issues, and profound personal suffering. Due to a medical issue, Maria Farmer requests her statement be read into the record by her attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00010649.jpg
A letter dated June 22, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, representing Teresa Helm, asserts that Helm was trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 and requests permission for Helm to make an oral victim impact statement at the upcoming sentencing. The majority of the detailed statement is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00010526.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 21, 2022, in the criminal case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes the procedure for victims who wish to make a statement at sentencing, requiring them to submit a written statement via email to the Victim Witness Unit by noon on June 23, 2022. The Government is also ordered to inform the Defendant of any anticipated victim impact statements by 2:00 p.m. on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010524.jpg
A court order filed on June 17, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules the sentencing for June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York and outlines logistics for press, public, and victim access, while prohibiting electronic devices and telephone dial-in access.
DOJ-OGR-00010504.jpg
A character reference letter submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan by Kevin Maxwell in support of his sister, Ghislaine Maxwell, following her trial. Kevin Maxwell asserts that the prosecution's portrayal of Ghislaine contradicts his lifelong experience with her, describing her as a generous problem-solver who has financially assisted friends, family, and employees.
DOJ-OGR-00010497.jpg
This document is the first page of a character reference letter written by Isabel Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in support of her sister, Ghislaine Maxwell, prior to sentencing. Isabel highlights her own professional credentials, affirms her presence at the trial, and describes Ghislaine's upbringing, specifically noting the impact of their brother's death and the values instilled by their parents.
DOJ-OGR-00010447.jpg
This document is the title page of the Sentencing Memorandum filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell, including attorneys from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010447.
DOJ-OGR-00010418.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists Maxwell's defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser, the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman. The filing supports Maxwell's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report.
DOJ-OGR-00010407.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal filing (Doc 657) from April 2022 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The court is rejecting the Defendant's arguments that pre-indictment delay caused a prejudicial loss of evidence, specifically noting the Defendant failed to explain the loss of government property records, proof of Epstein's residency, or flight manifests delivered by pilot Larry Visoski to Epstein's New York office. The court also dismisses arguments regarding deceased potential witnesses as vague assertions.
DOJ-OGR-00010371.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court filing from April 29, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text outlines applicable law regarding the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, specifically discussing 'multiplicity' in indictments and how to determine if conspiracy charges involve the same agreement. It cites various legal precedents including Brown v. Ohio, United States v. Jones, and a previous ruling in the Maxwell case itself.
DOJ-OGR-00010367.jpg
This legal document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated April 29, 2022, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document, authored by Judge Alison J. Nathan, provides background on Maxwell's 2020 indictment for sex trafficking with Jeffrey Epstein, the subsequent thirteen-day trial, and the jury's guilty verdict on five of six counts. It introduces the defendant's post-trial motions, which argue for vacating some or all of her convictions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity