United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019258.jpg
This is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on September 2, 2020. The order addresses Maxwell's request to modify a protective order to allow her to file discovery materials under seal in related civil cases. The document notably approves Government redactions to previous filings, citing the need to protect an 'ongoing grand jury investigation.'
DOJ-OGR-00019239.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on September 3, 2020 (received September 4, 2020) in the Southern District of New York. Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 court order that denied her motion to modify a protective order. The filing cites legal precedents (Pichler v. UNITE, Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., and Brown v. Maxwell) to establish jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine.
DOJ-OGR-00019222.jpg
This document is the final signature page (Page 19 of 19) of a federal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists the specific US Code violations (including conspiracy, perjury, and sex trafficking statutes) and is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00019192.jpg
This document is the final signature page (Page 19 of 19) of an indictment filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the charges under 18 U.S.C. codes (including conspiracy, perjury, and sex trafficking statutes) and bears the name of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and the signature of the Grand Jury Foreperson.
DOJ-OGR-00019175.jpg
This document is a sealed indictment filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, charging GHISLAINE MAXWELL with one count of conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts. The indictment alleges that MAXWELL played a significant role in the sexual exploitation and abuse of multiple minor girls by Jeffrey Epstein between at least 1994 and 1997, assisting Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing victims as young as 14 years old, knowing they were underage, and causing them to travel.
DOJ-OGR-00019125.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 9, 2021. The trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00016927.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The proceedings took place on December 18, 2021, at 9:10 a.m. in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorneys including Maurene Comey) and the defense (including Jeffrey Pagliuca and Christian Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00016484.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 16, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman; Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00013279.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00013014.jpg
Cover page of the official transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 7, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The document lists Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (US Attorneys) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00010538.jpg
This legal memorandum, filed on June 22, 2022, from the United States Government, concerns the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her instrumental role in the sexual abuse of young teenage girls, often in conjunction with Jeffrey Epstein, and highlights the lasting harm inflicted on victims. The document states that Maxwell's sentencing is scheduled for June 28, 2022, and argues for a sentencing range of 360 to 660 months' imprisonment under the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00010536.jpg
This document is the cover page for "The Government's Sentencing Memorandum" in the criminal case of the United States of America versus Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on June 22, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the legal counsel for the government, including U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and several Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00010532.jpg
This is a court order issued on June 21, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order corrects the contact information for Wendy Olsen, the Coordinator of the Victim Witness Unit, and establishes the procedure for victims who wish to make a statement at sentencing. Victims are required to submit a written statement by email to the Victim Witness Unit by noon on June 23, 2022, and must indicate if they also wish to make an oral statement.
DOJ-OGR-00009191.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00009122.jpg
This document is the Preliminary Statement from a legal memorandum filed by the US Government on February 24, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has not met the heavy burden required to prove that a juror deliberately lied during voir dire or that the juror would have been struck for cause, citing legal precedents such as McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood. The filing requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion based on the present record.
DOJ-OGR-00009099.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the 'Voir Dire' (jury selection) proceedings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal teams present for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus Sternheim and Stabile).
DOJ-OGR-00009002.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2022. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00008987.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court filing (Document 609) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. It presents legal arguments citing various precedents to establish that jurors retain privacy interests after a trial concludes and that jurors face criminal exposure for perjury on questionnaires. It also argues that third parties may intervene in criminal trials to protect their constitutional rights.
DOJ-OGR-00008980.jpg
This document is the cover page for a Memorandum of Law filed on February 24, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed by attorney Todd Spodek on behalf of 'Juror 50', who is seeking to intervene in the case to release a sealed jury questionnaire and transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00008976.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 24, 2022. The order approves the defendant's proposed redactions to court documents, finding they are necessary to protect juror anonymity and privacy. The court orders the parties to file the redacted briefs and other materials by February 25, 2022, and also states it will docket a motion from 'Juror 50'.
DOJ-OGR-00008972.jpg
This is a court order filed on February 18, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, rejecting specific redaction requests because the information constitutes legal arguments or is widely reported in the press. The document specifically lists page and line numbers in the Defense Brief where redactions were denied.
DOJ-OGR-00008925.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00008916.jpg
This document is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 11, 2022, in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is a response to a request from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) to file an amicus brief regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial. The judge sets a deadline of February 18, 2022, for any party to file such a motion and outlines four specific requirements that must be met for the court to consider it.
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
This is a court order filed on February 11, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denies the defendant's motion to seal all documents related to her motion for a new trial in their entirety, ruling that sealing must be narrowly tailored. The document also references a motion to intervene by 'Juror 50' and mentions that media organizations have requested the unsealing of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00019865.jpg
This document is the first page of the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution argues that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk due to her wealth, three passports, foreign citizenship, and lack of ties to the US, and requests she be detained pending trial for her alleged role in partnering with Jeffrey Epstein to exploit minors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity