United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010366.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on April 26, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order sets a new, advanced schedule for sentencing submissions from both the prosecution and defense, following a letter from the Government. The schedule outlines several deadlines in May and June 2022, culminating in the final sentencing hearing on June 28, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010364.jpg
This is a letter dated April 25, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests that the court order the Probation Office to complete its revised Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) earlier than the currently scheduled date of June 21, 2022. The letter argues that the current schedule, which has the revised PSR due on the same day as the defendant's sentencing submission, does not allow the parties sufficient time to incorporate the report's findings into their own submissions before the June 28 sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010324.jpg
This document is the first page of an Opinion & Order filed on April 1, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the allegation that 'Juror 50' provided inaccurate information regarding a history of sexual abuse during jury selection. The text outlines the legal standards for impartial juries and notes that an uncommon post-trial hearing was conducted to investigate the juror's conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Vernon S. Broderick dated April 1, 2022, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government opposes the defendant's request to stay proceedings based on a Paramount Plus trailer featuring an interview with Juror 50, arguing the request is speculative and that the Court has already conducted a thorough fact-finding hearing regarding the juror.
DOJ-OGR-00010319.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated April 1, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The government requests an extension, specifically an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, until April 22, 2022, for Counts Seven and Eight in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. This extension is sought to allow parties to continue researching and briefing pending post-trial motions, which the government argues is in the interests of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00010291.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on March 15, 2022, it is the government's memorandum opposing the defendant's motion for a new trial. The prosecution team is headed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00010267.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions,' filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell: Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010267.
DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg
This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.
DOJ-OGR-00010204.jpg
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed on March 18, 2013, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse. The case (S3 09 Cr. 581) involves multiple defendants including Paul Daugerdas, Donna Guerin, and Denis Field. The document also bears markings indicating it was later filed as Exhibit A-6074 in a 2020 civil case (1:20-cv-00338-AJN) on August 24, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010158.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from a proceeding on October 12, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. David K. Parse, with Judge William H. Pauley III presiding. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, and the defense, represented by Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder.
DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg
This document is an affidavit filed by David Parse on August 7, 2012, in the criminal case *USA v. Daugerdas et al.* (Case 1:09-cr-00581). In the affidavit, Parse attests that during jury selection, he heard attorney Theresa Trzaskoma mention a juror had the same name as a suspended attorney but dismissed it as a coincidence. Parse states he only learned later (after a motion for a new trial was filed) that the issue of the juror ('Conrad') actually being the suspended lawyer had surfaced prior to deliberations. Note: While this document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text strictly concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case and juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010126.jpg
This document is the first page of a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at NYU, filed on April 6, 2012, in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. Gillers outlines his qualifications and states he was asked to address whether attorneys for the firm Brune & Richard met their ethical obligations regarding the disclosure of a 'July 21 letter' and an investigation into 'Juror No. 1.' The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice release (DOJ-OGR stamp), though the specific text on this page relates to the Daugerdas tax fraud case rather than explicitly mentioning Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009870.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" for the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00009801.jpg
This document is the preliminary statement of a memorandum filed by the United States Government on March 11, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has failed to meet the heavy burden required to prove juror misconduct during voir dire. The text cites legal precedents to support the finality of trials and argues the motion should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00009693.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 11, 2022. The case is identified as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00009691.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 9, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order confirms that, following a hearing, the court has docketed several case documents, including an Opinion & Order and a signed immunity order, with limited redactions to protect juror anonymity. The judge further orders that the unredacted versions of these documents will be filed under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00009660.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on March 9, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is based on an application by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted individual to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022. The document states that this individual had refused to testify, citing the privilege against self-incrimination, but the U.S. Attorney judged their testimony to be in the public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00009632.jpg
This document is a court order filed on March 7, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details an application by US Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted male witness to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022, despite the witness refusing to do so based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The document cites Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003 regarding immunity and compulsion of testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009630.jpg
This is a legal declaration filed on March 7, 2022, by Assistant US Attorney Lara Pomerantz in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document supports an application to grant immunity to a redacted male witness who has refused to testify based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The prosecution seeks to compel this witness's testimony for a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00009626.jpg
This legal document is an application filed on March 7, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The application requests a court order to grant immunity to and compel the testimony of a witness, whose name is redacted, for a hearing scheduled on March 8, 2022. The witness had previously refused to testify, invoking their privilege against self-incrimination.
DOJ-OGR-00009563.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Omnibus Post-Trial Motions, filed on February 25, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney and Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach as Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.
DOJ-OGR-00009527.jpg
This document is an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed by the United States on March 18, 2013, regarding defendant David Parse. It outlines the procedural history, noting Parse's conviction on May 24, 2011, for obstructing IRS laws and mail fraud following an eleven-week trial involving 'one of the largest tax fraud schemes ever charged.' The document appears to be part of a larger case file (possibly related to the Jenkens & Gilchrist tax shelter case) that may have been included in a larger document production.
DOJ-OGR-00009525.jpg
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed by the United States (via US Attorney Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse in the case *United States v. Paul Daugerdas, et al.* (S3 09 Cr. 581). Originally filed on March 18, 2013, this specific copy was submitted as Exhibit A-6074 on February 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), likely as legal precedent or background material.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity