United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002807.jpg
This document is a legal declaration filed by Sigrid S. McCawley on March 26, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, an attorney for an intervenor, declares under penalty of perjury that she meets the requirements for admission pro hac vice, including having no felony convictions or disciplinary actions. She is associated with Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and is a member of the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C.
DOJ-OGR-00002806.jpg
This legal document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, is requesting permission to appear as counsel for her firm and the victims they represent in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion affirms McCawley's good standing in the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C., and attests that she has no history of felonies or disciplinary actions.
DOJ-OGR-00002805.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 26, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters her appearance as counsel for the Intervenor (the law firm itself) and the victims represented by the firm.
DOJ-OGR-00002804.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Boies of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is formally notifying the court that he is appearing as counsel for his firm (as an Intervenor) and for the unnamed victims the firm represents in this matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002802.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the court's March 22, 2021 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document confirms Maxwell's status as committed (incarcerated) and lists the Assistant U.S. Attorneys prosecuting the case.
DOJ-OGR-00002762.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, filed on March 18, 2021. The order addresses disputes between the Government and the Defendant regarding requests to redact and seal information in pre-trial motions. The Court outlines the three-part legal test from the Second Circuit it will use to rule on these requests, balancing the presumption of public access against factors like judicial efficiency and privacy interests.
DOJ-OGR-00002759.jpg
A legal cover letter dated March 15, 2021, from attorneys Cohen and Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter lists ten reply memoranda being filed on behalf of their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. These filings relate to motions to dismiss indictments, suppress evidence (involving a redacted subpoena target), sever counts, and request a bill of particulars.
DOJ-OGR-00002732.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The document lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from three different law firms based in New York and Colorado.
DOJ-OGR-00002727.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 4, 2021, providing a status update on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government reports that Maxwell receives 13 hours of discovery review time daily (more than any other inmate), has access to both desktop and laptop computers, and maintains regular video-teleconference contact with her attorneys despite the suspension of in-person visits due to COVID-19.
DOJ-OGR-00002694.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal memorandum filed on February 4, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002692.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, dated January 25, 2021. It serves as a notice of motion from Maxwell's defense team, led by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP, requesting a bill of particulars and other pretrial disclosures from the prosecution. The document also requests oral argument on the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00005277.jpg
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 22, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order announces the attachment of the court's draft jury questionnaire and voir dire, noting that it includes changes from a proceeding on the previous day. It also mentions an additional question has been proposed due to the District's COVID-19 protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00005274.jpg
A court order filed on October 22, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330). The document outlines procedures for jury selection, including the administration of screening questionnaires in early November and the anonymization of jurors using assigned numbers. It mandates that the prosecution and defense confer to categorize prospective jurors into four lists regarding their eligibility for voir dire or excusal.
DOJ-OGR-00005268.jpg
A court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 20, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets the agenda for a telephone conference scheduled for the following day to discuss jury selection logistics and an unopposed request to seal the joint proposed juror questionnaire. The Judge also notes that the Court's draft questionnaire will be emailed to the parties immediately for discussion during the conference.
DOJ-OGR-00005266.jpg
This is a court order filed on October 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection, providing public dial-in numbers while noting a separate line for involved parties (counsel, defendant, victims, family). It also explicitly warns against recording or rebroadcasting the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00005264.jpg
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government is submitting motions *in limine* under seal, requesting redactions to protect the privacy of victims and third parties, and specifically requesting that 'Section X' remain redacted until the conclusion of the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005246.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 15, 2021. It discusses the scheduling of motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which governs the admissibility of evidence regarding a victim's sexual behavior. The document contains an endorsement by Judge Nathan ordering that such motions be filed by October 27, 2021, with responses due November 1, and a tentative hearing on November 5.
DOJ-OGR-00005243.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 15, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter addresses a complaint about legal mail delivery delays at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), detailing the specific administrative steps mail must go through (warehouse logging, legal department retrieval, internal tracking) before reaching an inmate. The government consulted with MDC legal counsel to explain these procedures to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00005237.jpg
This document is a letter filed on October 15, 2021, by the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning the deadline for the defendant to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which governs the admissibility of evidence regarding a victim's sexual behavior. The document outlines the legal standards and purpose of Rule 412, emphasizing victim privacy protections.
DOJ-OGR-00005233.jpg
This document is a court order issued on October 15, 2021, by U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order acknowledges the court's receipt of a letter from the defendant concerning the delivery of her legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The judge orders the Government to respond to the defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00005232.jpg
This is a court order dated October 14, 2021, from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan acknowledges receipt of a letter from the defendant regarding a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 and orders the Government to respond by 5:00 p.m. on October 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005224.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, filed on October 14, 2021. The order addresses the court's receipt of a letter from a victim's lawyer regarding trial attendance, stating it will be filed under seal and shared with counsel. It also outlines procedures for ensuring public, victim, and defendant's family access to the upcoming trial, providing contact information for coordination through the Victim Witness Unit and the District Executive's Office.
DOJ-OGR-00005223.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan acknowledges receipt of the defendant's motion for a specific type of jury selection (voir dire) and orders the Government to file a response by Monday, October 18, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005206.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a Memorandum of Law, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 13, 2021. It is filed by the legal team for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion seeks an individual and sequestered jury selection process (voir dire) to be partially conducted by the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00005205.jpg
This is a Notice of Motion filed on October 13, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys for Maxwell are formally notifying the court and prosecution of their intent to request a specific jury selection process, namely 'individual sequestered juror voir dire and limited counsel-conducted voir dire'. The motion is to be brought before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity