United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00005665.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'Motion in Limine', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 29, 2021. The motion is filed on behalf of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose of the motion is to request the exclusion of evidence related to an individual identified as 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00005625.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to exclude evidence based on Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the precedent set by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a hearing on the matter. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005595.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to prevent the prosecution from introducing statements from alleged co-conspirators. This request is framed as a sanction for the prosecution's purported failure to adhere to a court order issued on September 3, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005555.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum of Law' filed on October 29, 2021, by the United States Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330). The filing is in further support of the government's motions in limine and lists Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005394.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE" for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document was filed on October 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The prosecution is represented by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005392.jpg
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 28, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021, and details the logistical arrangements, including the location, access for victims and family, and COVID-19 protocols for public viewing in designated overflow courtrooms. The order explicitly prohibits the use of electronic devices in the overflow rooms.
DOJ-OGR-00005387.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on October 27, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses logistics regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire, scheduling the release of juror names to counsel for November 16 and anticipating opening statements to begin on November 29 following peremptory strikes.
DOJ-OGR-00005380.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 26, 2021. The Government accepts the Court's proposed remarks for jury selection but seeks clarification on when the specific names of prospective jurors will be revealed to the legal parties. The Government requests confirmation that juror names will be withheld from the parties until November 16, 2021, the start of oral voir dire, to maintain juror anonymity in open court.
DOJ-OGR-00005379.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed by Christian Everdell, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting a one-week extension (until November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet. The letter explains that the delay is needed due to other pressing deadlines and states that the government consents to the request. Judge Alison J. Nathan signed and ordered the approval of this request on October 26, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005375.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan sets deadlines for omnibus response briefs (due Oct 25) and reply briefs (due Oct 27) regarding motions in limine. The order also mandates that by October 29, 2021, the parties must file public versions of these briefs with proposed redactions and submit a joint letter justifying those redactions based on Second Circuit legal standards.
DOJ-OGR-00005358.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'JOINT PROPOSED EXAMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS' for the criminal case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Filed on October 22, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002895.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 195) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 5, 2021. The Government is arguing that the Court should require notice for all Rule 17(c) subpoenas rather than allowing them to be issued *ex parte* (without notice), citing various legal precedents (Wey, Earls, Skelos, St. Lawrence, Boyle) to support the position that *ex parte* proceedings should only be permitted with a compelling reason. Footnotes clarify the Government's concern regarding financial institutions responding to broad subpoenas for impeachment purposes and state that this request does not apply to subpoenas returnable at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002674.jpg
This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.
DOJ-OGR-00005784.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal document filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The document is the government's omnibus memorandum opposing motions in limine filed by the defendant. It lists the prosecution team, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00005775.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude the introduction of specific government exhibits (251, 288, 294, 313, and 606) in her trial. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005747.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude law enforcement witnesses from offering expert opinion testimony. The document lists the names and contact information for the four attorneys and their respective law firms representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005738.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005726.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002913.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated April 9, 2021, regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that the timing of a superseding indictment (S2) was based on new evidence—specifically involving 'Minor Victim-4'—rather than improper motives, and opposes any delay to the trial scheduled for July 2021. The letter also asserts that the new charges reinforce the Court's previous decisions to deny bail to Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002901.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. It states that Maxwell receives 13 hours of discovery review time daily (more than any other inmate) with access to both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints about missing emails, clarifying that an MDC investigation found Maxwell deleted them herself or archived them, rather than staff deleting them.
DOJ-OGR-00002866.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 24) of a Superseding Indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific US Codes violated (conspiracy, sex trafficking, perjury, transportation of minors) and bears the name of US Attorney Audrey Strauss and the signature of the Grand Jury Foreperson.
DOJ-OGR-00002843.jpg
This is the first page of a Superseding Indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the SDNY against Ghislaine Maxwell. Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 2004, Maxwell recruited and groomed victims as young as 14 for Jeffrey Epstein, knowing they were minors.
DOJ-OGR-00002822.jpg
This legal document is an "Opinion & Order" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated March 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Joshua Adam Schulte. The court denies a motion by Schulte, a former CIA employee accused of leaking information to Wikileaks, to dismiss a superseding indictment. Schulte argued the grand jury was unconstitutional due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the court rejected this claim, allowing the prosecution to proceed towards a second trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity