United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009476.jpg
This is an affidavit from David Parse, a defendant in case S3 09 Cr. 581 in the Southern District of New York, filed on August 7, 2012. Parse states that he only became aware of a potential issue regarding a juror named Conrad being a suspended lawyer after his legal team, the Brune firm, had already filed a motion for a new trial. He specifies learning this information after a conference call on July 15, 2011, and recalls his lawyer, Theresa Trzaskoma, had previously dismissed a concern about a prospective juror having the same name during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00009447.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal declaration by Stephen Gillers, a law professor and expert in legal ethics, filed on April 6, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Gillers outlines his extensive qualifications and states that he has been asked by the court to provide an opinion on whether the attorneys for clients named Bruce and Richard fulfilled their ethical obligations regarding the potential failure to disclose a letter and an investigation concerning 'Juror No. 1' during March, May, and July of 2011.
DOJ-OGR-00002962.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from the U.S. Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 16, 2021. The Government submits this memorandum to oppose twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defendant on January 25, 2021. The statement outlines the Government's arguments for denying the motions, asserting that they lack support in fact or law and addressing specific points such as the irrelevance of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and the timeliness of the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002935.jpg
This is the cover page for the Government's Omnibus Memorandum opposing the defendant's pre-trial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S1 20 Cr. 330). The document was filed on April 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, and lists the prosecution team led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00004893.jpg
This document is a cover letter filed on July 2, 2021, by attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It accompanies the filing of unsealed Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress, in compliance with a court order dated July 1, 2021. The document bears the case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and a DOJ bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00004806.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell on July 1, 2021. The order lifts the temporary seal on a previous opinion regarding Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence. It also unseals a memorandum decision, an order, and hearing transcripts from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, and orders Maxwell to file these documents on the public docket without redaction by July 2, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00004785.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order filed on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, the law firm that represented Virginia Giuffre in a 2015 civil defamation suit against Maxwell. The document outlines the background of the civil suit, noting that Giuffre alleged defamation regarding accusations of sexual abuse by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004782.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the defendant's request that the Government is only required to file updates if there are material changes to Maxwell's conditions of confinement. The court noted it would take no further action absent other specific applications for relief.
DOJ-OGR-00004780.jpg
This is a court order issued on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and further orders the unsealing of documents from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, including a memorandum and transcripts from hearings in March and April 2019. The parties are given a short timeframe to confer and propose redactions to these documents before they are made public.
DOJ-OGR-00004776.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 16, 2021. The order approves redactions proposed by Maxwell regarding a Government update on her confinement conditions and orders the Government to publicly file the redacted version by June 17, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00004748.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a videoconference hearing held on April 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Tiffany Days (Case No. 19 CR 0619). Tiffany Days was one of the prison guards charged with falsifying records on the night Jeffrey Epstein died. Notably, the header indicates this document was filed on June 15, 2021, as Document 300 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the case number for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting this transcript was used as an exhibit or filing in the Maxwell trial.
DOJ-OGR-00004743.jpg
Mandate issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on June 7, 2021, affirming the District Court's orders denying bail to Ghislaine Maxwell. The court denied her motion for bail or temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, which the appellate court directed back to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00004737.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on June 4, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for specific items, including a victim's teenage diary, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The judge notes that while the victim's diary describes visiting Epstein in New York, there is no indication Maxwell is mentioned in the journal.
DOJ-OGR-00004735.jpg
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 2, 2021, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order establishes a detailed disclosure and filing schedule for the prosecution and defense, setting deadlines from September to November 2021 for key pre-trial activities such as disclosing victim identities, witness lists, expert reports, and filing various motions.
DOJ-OGR-00004712.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from a legal memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on May 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions should be denied, presenting five key reasons. These include the assertion that a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein is irrelevant to this case, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply, the charges are timely under the statute of limitations, and claims of prosecutorial delay are unfounded.
DOJ-OGR-00014717.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 28, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (led by US Attorney Damian Williams) and the defense team (including attorneys from Haddon Morgan and Foreman and Cohen & Gresser). Also noted as present are representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00014679.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 22, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, details the legal teams for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), and notes the presence of FBI agent Amanda Young and NYPD officer Paul Byrne. The document was filed on August 10, 2022, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00014679.
DOJ-OGR-00014659.jpg
Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00002842.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that redactions on a letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP be removed unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release.
DOJ-OGR-00002767.jpg
This document is the first page of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, and summarizes the procedural history of her previous bail denials due to flight risk. The order sets up a discussion regarding Maxwell's third motion for release on bail, filed in February 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002726.jpg
This legal document is an affidavit filed by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Dated January 25, 2020, the affidavit certifies that the defense attempted in good faith to resolve issues with government counsel regarding a Motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures, but no agreement was reached. This filing is a procedural requirement under Local Criminal Rule 16.1.
DOJ-OGR-00020128.jpg
This is a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the charges against Maxwell (sex trafficking of minors and perjury) and addresses her renewed motion for release on bail pending trial. The judge reiterates the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a clear flight risk and indicates that new arguments presented only solidify this view.
DOJ-OGR-00020104.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on December 23, 2020, it is a reply memorandum in support of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document lists the names and contact information for her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00020064.jpg
This legal document is a memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, stating that the court's previous decision to deny bail was correct because she remains a serious flight risk. The memorandum asserts that her new bail proposal is just a repackaging of old arguments and does not mitigate the risks posed by her extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
DOJ-OGR-00020061.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 28, 2020. It is the U.S. Government's memorandum opposing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release in criminal case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists the prosecuting attorneys, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity