RICHARD D. KAHN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
78
Very Strong
|
74 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
49
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Client |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor representative |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor of estate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor deceased |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co executors |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co defendants |
4
|
4 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Mary "Molly" S. Dirago
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Estate executor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Valerie Sirota
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor administrator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-12 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by Charles L. Glover | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-08 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew J. Aaronson | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-08 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Valerie Sirota | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Jane Doe 15 case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Filing of Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Mary Doe v. Indyke et al. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Opinion issued in related case Mary Doe v. Indyke and Kahn. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-16 | N/A | Defendants served responses and objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests. | N/A | View |
| 2020-04-14 | N/A | Filing of Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-13 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to file reply | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-03-27 | N/A | Filing of Answer and Affirmative Defenses | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-17 | N/A | Summons filed in Civil Action Case 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-17 | N/A | Summons filed in the US District Court Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-16 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants' reply | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-10 | N/A | Plaintiff served 68 Requests for Production and 14 Interrogatories on Defendants. | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to file motion to dismiss | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | New deadline for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (extended from Feb 21). | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Defendant's motion to dismiss. | Court | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Order issued granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within two weeks. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-21 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants' motion to dismiss | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-17 | N/A | Proposed extended deadline for Defendants to answer or respond to the complaint. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Order on Plaintiff's Anonymity | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Parties exchanged initial Rule 26 disclosures. | N/A | View |
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, using the pseudonym Anastasia Doe, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Other Personal Injury' and jurisdiction is based on diversity.
048.pdf
This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF in the Southern District of New York, filed on October 8, 2020. Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 voluntarily dismisses her action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities without costs. The document is signed by attorneys David H. Brodie (for the Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the Defendants).
045.pdf
A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program on July 11, 2020. The parties request that the current lawsuit remain stayed pending the resolution of the compensation claim.
044.pdf
A Notice of Change of Address filed on July 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz notifies the court that his firm, Troutman Sanders LLP, has changed its name to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the physical address and contact numbers remain the same.
036.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on December 23, 2019, by Bennet J. Moskowitz, an attorney for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The declaration serves to submit a copy of the Plaintiff's (Jane Doe 17) original complaint as an exhibit in support of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the case in the Southern District of New York.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
034.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on December 23, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The defendants, representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporations, are moving to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The hearing is scheduled before Judge Paul E. Engelmayer.
033.pdf
A letter motion dated December 19, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities, requesting a brief extension to respond to the complaint in Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter lists numerous corporate defendants linked to Epstein, including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request on the same day and noted that future requests should be directed to Judge Freeman.
031.pdf
This document is a Rule 7.1 Statement filed on December 19, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities. The filing, submitted by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP, certifies that none of the defendant corporations have parent corporations or are owned 10% or more by publicly held corporations. It lists numerous entities associated with Epstein, including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, and various LLCs.
029.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation filed on December 12, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agree to an order protecting the Plaintiff's anonymity, outlining strict protocols for disclosing her identity only to necessary defense counsel and staff, requiring Non-Disclosure Agreements for any other necessary disclosures. It includes the text of the proposed order and a template NDA.
027.pdf
A letter from defense attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests the court vacate a recent order granting the plaintiff anonymity, not to oppose the anonymity itself, but to ensure they have the opportunity to respond regarding the specific terms of that anonymity to protect their defense rights, citing a previous deadline of December 21, 2019.
025.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 8, 2019, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion of Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' to proceed anonymously in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and various associated corporate entities.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities (including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company). The motion requests a court order allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and lists the legal representation for the plaintiff from three different law firms.
024-02.pdf
A proposed court order from November 2019 in the Southern District of New York regarding case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The document grants Plaintiff Jane Doe 17's motion to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by Indyke and Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities.
024-01.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.
023.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on November 7, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE (Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP formally enters the case to represent the defendants, specifically the estate executors Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as well as numerous corporate entities associated with Epstein (e.g., Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, JEGE Inc.).
022.pdf
This document is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on November 6, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). Attorney Alan Goldfarb of Miami, Florida, is entering his appearance to represent the Plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, in a lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of the Epstein Estate).
021.pdf
A legal filing from Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities in the case Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Engelmayer of an agreement between parties regarding the acceptance of service and an extension of time until December 21, 2019, for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The judge granted and signed the order on November 5, 2019.
019.pdf
This document is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on October 28, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). Attorney David H. Brodie enters his appearance as counsel for 'All plaintiffs' (identified as Jane Doe 17 in the caption) in the lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
018.pdf
This is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on October 28, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Laura J. Starr is entering her appearance to represent 'All plaintiffs' (specifically Jane Doe 17) in the case against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
016.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the motion for attorney David H. Brodie to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the plaintiff.
015.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signed the order granting attorney Alan Goldfarb's motion to appear *pro hac vice* on behalf of the plaintiff.
010.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 24, 2019, in the Southern District of New York by attorney Andrew S. Buzin. The motion seeks the admission of Florida attorney Laura J. Starr *pro hac vice* to represent the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The filing includes Starr's declaration, a certificate of good standing from the Florida Supreme Court, and a proposed order. Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz stated that the Defendants do not oppose the motion.
009.pdf
This is an unopposed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Andrew S. Buzin to admit Laura J. Starr pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document includes a declaration by Laura J. Starr confirming her good standing with the Florida Bar and lack of disciplinary history, a certificate of service, and a certificate of good standing from the Florida Bar.
007.pdf
This document is a formal Summons in a Civil Action filed on October 22, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (represented by Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Laurel Inc, NES LLC, etc.). The summons instructs the defendants to respond within 21 days to avoid a default judgment and lists the plaintiff's legal representation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity