Bobbi Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
22
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-22 | N/A | Service of the EVCP (Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) confirmed. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Pretrial conference | A Pretrial Conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell, with her present alongside her attorneys an... | Before Judge Alison J. Nath... | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-22 | Legal proceeding | Filing of a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020457.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 5 to December 9, 2021. It details daily jury trial proceedings, legal correspondence regarding evidence and witness testimony (specifically regarding 'Witness-3' and alleged sexual activity), and administrative orders such as juror reimbursement. The document lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020444.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings on November 10 and 11, 2021. It details the scheduling of voir dire, COVID-19 courtroom protocols, and rulings on motions in limine, including the denial of a defense motion to exclude expert testimony on grooming. It also lists the attorneys present for both the prosecution and defense during a pretrial conference.
DOJ-OGR-00020440.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from November 2 to November 4, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding trial length, juror anonymity, release on bond, and evidentiary hearings (Rule 412 and Daubert). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a hearing for November 10, 2021, and directed the government to address issues regarding Maxwell's transportation and access to legal mail at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020439.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from October 29, 2021, to November 2, 2021. It lists various court orders regarding legal mail, motions in limine, redactions, and scheduling for Daubert and Rule 412 hearings. It also includes a minute entry for a pretrial conference attended by the defendant, legal counsel, and government representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00020435.jpg
This document is a court docket from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from October 20-22, 2021. It records efforts by media organizations, including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, to oppose the sealing of jury selection materials, ensuring public access. The central entry is a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying the request to seal the materials and outlining the specific procedures and a comprehensive schedule for the upcoming jury selection process, including questionnaires, voir dire, and deadlines for counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020434.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from October 2021 detailing pre-trial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records various filings related to jury selection (voir dire), motions in limine, and Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (rape shield law), as well as the scheduling of a telephone conference. The document also notes the deletion of an incorrectly filed document and provides public access information for court proceedings while warning against recording.
DOJ-OGR-00020432.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from September 1, 2021, to October 13, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan ordering the government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators, scheduling jury selection for November 19, and various filings regarding redactions and voir dire procedures. The document highlights the logistical preparations for the trial, including scheduling around the Christmas holidays.
DOJ-OGR-00020414.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 15-16, 2021. It lists several entries, including a motion by the defense to continue the trial date, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions and the docketing of legal memorandums, and the Government's memorandum in opposition to twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defense. The judge also issued an order regarding the filing of reply briefs and procedures for requesting redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00015539.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015168.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 17, 2021. It records an agreement between the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense to admit specific exhibits (MG-12, MG-1, 610-A, and A-5) into evidence. The document bears signatures from both the Assistant United States Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015166.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). It represents an agreement between the prosecution and defense regarding the authenticity of UK land registry records. Specifically, it validates records retrieved in 2021 concerning properties at 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London, with one record dating back to ownership confirmation in January 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00016914.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell presents stipulations agreed upon by both parties, including the birth date of Mike Wallace and the opening dates of *The Lion King* on Broadway. The page concludes with the beginning of a written stipulation regarding a witness named 'Kate' attending a meeting with prosecutors in September, listing the full legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00009084.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The potential juror denies having any personal or familial connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. As the juror answered 'No' to all questions, the follow-up section for explanation is left blank.
DOJ-OGR-00019818.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 23 of 24) from 'Case 21-58' covering entries from March 22 to March 24, 2021. It details the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail by Judge Alison J. Nathan and Maxwell's subsequent notice of appeal. Additionally, it contains a detailed order regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, requiring the firm to file objections on the public docket.
DOJ-OGR-00019794.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering March 22-24, 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's third motion for bail and Maxwell subsequently filing a Notice of Appeal. Additionally, a significant order was issued regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, setting protocols for victim notification and filing objections to the subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00019768.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's third motion for bail and issuing an order regarding the defense's attempt to subpoena a law firm representing alleged victims. Maxwell subsequently filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the bail denial.
DOJ-OGR-00009775.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-000389-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, attests that they do not personally know and have had no dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The juror's negative responses indicate no known conflicts of interest with the key legal figures in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00009677.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror ID 50 attests that they do not know and have no past or present dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The responses indicate no declared conflicts of interest between the potential juror and the key legal figures in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg
This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00005295.jpg
This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwel...
Defense filing in support of bail motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity