Bobbi Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
22
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-22 | N/A | Service of the EVCP (Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) confirmed. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Pretrial conference | A Pretrial Conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell, with her present alongside her attorneys an... | Before Judge Alison J. Nath... | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-22 | Legal proceeding | Filing of a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
EFTA00020978.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
EFTA00020832.pdf
This document is an email dated November 9, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim). The email notifies counsel that a hard drive containing new discovery production is available for pickup at One St. Andrew's Plaza and highlights a specific disclosure regarding a witness statement. It also confirms that copies of this and prior productions are being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell's review.
EFTA00020815.pdf
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 13, 2021. It accompanies the production of spreadsheets previously reviewed by the defense at an FBI office in Denver. The letter notes that the original spreadsheets contained embedded hyperlinks to images of 'child exploitation materials,' necessitating the creation of a sanitized version for production.
EFTA00020439.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
EFTA00020437.pdf
This document is an email correspondence between attorney David Oscar Markus and Assistant United States Attorneys regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus informs the government of his representation of Maxwell in her bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries, while the government responds regarding document availability and existing protective orders.
EFTA00020434.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific technical issues regarding discovery production, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on over 110,000 documents extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution team discusses internally setting up a call with their vendor, PAE, to address these errors.
EFTA00020430.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 29, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence details technical disputes regarding discovery materials, specifically the defense's inability to provide a hard drive to Maxwell in prison (MDC), issues with unreadable disks, missing email attachments, and discrepancies in metadata for over 110,000 files seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution explains that some metadata is missing because files were 'carved or deleted' and offers solutions for transferring missing files.
EFTA00020426.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
EFTA00020105.pdf
A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 11, 2021. The letter discloses that the Government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and two other redacted individuals (one with a former alias) as 'co-conspirators' during the upcoming trial. The document is marked confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00019599.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responding to a discovery request. The Government declines to produce broad FOIA-related documents citing lack of legal basis under Rule 16, but provides specific materials related to Radar Online and FBI-NY's involvement in the SDFL investigation as a courtesy. The letter also corrects a defense assertion regarding the FBI Florida office's role in the prosecution team.
EFTA00019422.pdf
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of materials stamped SDNY_GM_00274187 through SDNY_GM_0274302, which are identified in the index as a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated 12-15-2020. The document notes that the letter and materials are subject to a protective order.
EFTA00019420.pdf
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter documents the production of materials designated as confidential, specifically referencing a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated December 15, 2020. The document indicates ongoing discovery obligations and mentions that physical items are in FBI custody.
EFTA00019092.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 regarding discovery disputes in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific issues to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), including technical problems with Maxwell accessing files on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and significant metadata discrepancies where files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation/modification dates occurring after his death and the seizure of the devices (dates in 2020). The chain concludes with USANYS contractors scheduling an internal meeting to address these production issues.
EFTA00019056.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 1, 2021, addressed to defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves to distribute an attached Order issued by the Judge which was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00018883.pdf
This document is a formal notice from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated April 23, 2021. The Government notifies the defense of its intent to call Dr. Lisa Rocchio as an expert witness to testify on trauma psychology, the dynamics of sexual abuse, grooming, and delayed disclosure, though she has not evaluated specific victims in this case. The letter also reiterates requests for reciprocal discovery and disclosure of defense expert witnesses.
EFTA00018837.pdf
An email chain from October 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that discovery materials were shared via USAfx and discusses logistics for providing digital copies (CD or hard drive) to Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00018026.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2021, relating to the case United States v. Maxwell (20-Cr-330). Attorney David Oscar Markus emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit a responsive letter regarding a government filing from June 30, 2021, explaining that he lacked filing privileges in the SDNY. Judge Nathan's chambers replied with an attached order.
EFTA00016949.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 23, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It serves as a formal notice pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(G) that the Government intends to call a clinical expert witness (name redacted) to testify about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and the impact of trauma on minors. The letter outlines the scope of the expert's anticipated testimony and requests reciprocal discovery regarding any experts the defense intends to call.
EFTA00016509.pdf
An email dated November 28, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits a motion to preclude cross-examination under seal and copies defense attorneys including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger.
EFTA00015823.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 16 evidence discs labeled as 'Epstein Encase Files.' The government identified these discs as containing a forensic image of a computer seized from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2005. However, the government concluded that the original warrant authorized seizure but not the search of the computer's contents, and thus they lack the lawful authority to review the files or allow the defense to access them.
EFTA00015636.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding discovery disputes. Key issues include the logistics of providing electronic discovery to Maxwell in prison (MDC) because she cannot use disks, missing email attachments, and metadata discrepancies for thousands of files and photos recovered from Epstein's devices and residences. The prosecution explains that 'carved' or deleted files lack original metadata and that certain photos came from seized CDs rather than devices processed by the FBI's CART unit.
EFTA00015185.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00014661.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.
EFTA00014650.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 20, 2021, accompanying a production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as statements from individuals the government does not currently plan to call. The letter also clarifies labeling protocols for confidential documents under the Protective Order to avoid confusion with classified material.
EFTA00013302.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 30, 2020, between Assistant US Attorney Maurene (Comey) and defense attorney Christian Everdell, with other legal team members CC'd. The correspondence concerns a recent order by Judge Nathan denying bail; the defense states they believe no redactions are necessary for the opinion, and the prosecution agrees, attaching a draft joint letter to the Court to convey this position. The document is marked with Bates stamp EFTA00013302.
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwel...
Defense filing in support of bail motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity