| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Schoen
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Federal Register document
|
Evidentiary exhibit |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Investigative subject provider |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
APO
|
Investigator subject of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Goldman Sachs
|
Document production |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Evidence submission |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document producer recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SinoVision
|
Subject of investigation citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subject of investigation discovery |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submitter investigative subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Document provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ackrell Capital
|
Investigative subject evidence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
|
Investigative subject evidence provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subject of inquiry document provider |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Call from House Oversight Committee to DOJ regarding Jeffrey Epstein indictment. | N/A | View |
This document appears to be a page (p. 192) from a manuscript or essay discussing the philosophical and practical implications of Artificial Intelligence. It uses analogies involving Boeing 747 autolanding systems and references Benjamin Franklin to discuss human cognition versus AI. The text mentions 'Maes' lab' (likely referring to Pattie Maes at MIT Media Lab) and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was evidence in a congressional investigation, likely related to the MIT Media Lab/Epstein inquiry.
This document appears to be page 191 of a manuscript or book draft, likely produced during the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein (indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018423). The text discusses the evolution of Artificial Intelligence, its ability to self-learn, and debates within the physics community (citing George Ellis and Joe Silk) regarding 'post-empirical science' and the stalling of traditional scientific verification. The content aligns with Epstein's known interests in theoretical physics and transhumanism/AI, suggesting this may be part of a project he was writing or funding.
This document appears to be page 190 of a manuscript or book regarding Artificial Intelligence, specifically discussing the differences between 'Predictive Learning' and 'Representational Learning.' It cites mathematician Doron Zeilberger and AI designer Roger Grosse (referencing a 2013 work). While the page contains a House Oversight Bates stamp, the content is technical/scientific in nature, discussing machine learning algorithms, medical diagnostics, and computer creativity (music composition). It mentions 'Maes' (likely Pattie Maes of MIT Media Lab), which may be the link to the Epstein investigation given his funding of scientists.
This document appears to be page 189 of a manuscript, essay, or book regarding Artificial Intelligence and Transhumanism found within the House Oversight Epstein files. The text discusses the philosophical and technical implications of AI surpassing human intelligence (the Singularity), referencing Alan Turing, deep neural networks, and a 'New Caste' of engineers. It explicitly mentions 'Maes' AI' (likely referring to MIT professor Pattie Maes) and concludes with a reference to Joseph Weizenbaum.
This document appears to be page 188 of a non-fiction book investigating the history and philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. The text discusses the 'Disappearing AI Problem,' Alan Turing's 1950 paper 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence,' and the mechanics of the Turing Test. While stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018420,' suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation (potentially related to Epstein associations with tech figures or scientists), the specific content of this page is purely historical and theoretical regarding computer science.
This document appears to be a page (p. 187) from a book manuscript (Chapter Eleven: Citizens!) included in House Oversight Committee evidence regarding MIT. The text is a narrative describing the author's interactions with Pattie Maes at the MIT Media Lab in the 1990s, discussing the history of Artificial Intelligence, recommendation engines, and the work of Joseph Weizenbaum.
This document appears to be page 186 of a manuscript or book, likely 'The Seventh Sense' (referenced in the text), containing a theoretical discussion on the history of empires (Rome, Qin, Incas) and network theory. It draws parallels between ancient administrative efficiency and modern network dynamics, arguing that enduring power structures grow without destructive costs. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in evidence for a Congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein/MIT Media Lab inquiry.
This document appears to be a page (185) from a geopolitical manuscript or white paper discussing network theory, 'Hard Gatekeeping,' and the balance of power between the US and China. It references historical hegemony and political science theories by Kauffman, Little, and Wohlforth. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was produced as evidence in a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a book or manuscript (specifically referencing 'The Seventh Sense,' a concept and likely book title) analyzing US-China relations through the lens of network theory. It argues that China is not currently a military threat to the US but faces significant internal demographic and economic challenges. The text draws parallels to the diplomatic rapprochement of the 1970s, citing Nixon and Kissinger's efforts to engage with Zhou Enlai to avoid Chinese isolation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, potentially related to documents possessed by or sent to Epstein associates.
This document is page 182 of a manuscript or report discussing evolutionary biology, specifically the concept of 'co-evolution' and complexity theory. It references biological transitions, cooperation versus competition, and cites works by Smith, Szathmary, and others regarding social self-organization and systems theory. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation, likely recovered from files associated with Jeffrey Epstein's scientific interests.
This text outlines a grand strategy for US foreign policy regarding China, advocating for a "gatekept order" rather than direct containment. It argues for creating a strong network based on US values that other nations can join conditionally, while urging cooperation on global issues to avoid fatal conflict. The passage also introduces the concept of "Seventh Sense" logic, comparing geopolitical shifts to complex adaptive systems in nature.
This document (page 180, Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412) appears to be a page from a geopolitical strategy manuscript or policy paper. It analyzes US-China relations, arguing that traditional containment strategies are failing (citing the AIIB example from 2014) and discussing cultural differences in transparency ('diamonds vs jade'). The author proposes that the greatest threat is not a specific nation but the 'evolution of the network itself' and suggests a grand strategy of 'Hard Gatekeeping' modeled after Metternich's 'Concert of Nations'.
This document appears to be page 179 of a book or policy paper included in a House Oversight Committee evidence production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018411). The text is a geopolitical analysis of US-China relations, contrasting the strategies of 'engagement' (panda hugging) and 'containment' (panda kicking). It argues that despite economic integration, deep strategic misalignment exists due to differing worldviews and China's increasing desire to remain distinct rather than becoming 'Westernized.'
The text explores the geopolitical tension between the United States and China, comparing their relationship to historical rivalries like Germany and Great Britain to illustrate the dangers of the "security dilemma." It discusses how each nation's pursuit of security often leads to mutual insecurity and highlights their fundamentally different perceptions of the current global order—America viewing it as sustainable and beneficial, while China sees it as broken and in need of reconstruction ("Da po, Da li").
This document appears to be page 177 of a manuscript or policy paper (often attributed to Jeffrey Epstein in the context of House Oversight releases) discussing a geopolitical strategy termed 'Hard Gatekeeping.' The text argues for shifting US military focus away from traditional hardware (aircraft carriers, bombers) toward 'topological control' and defense against contagions, panic, and cyberattacks. It cites historical examples of defensive strategies (Roman Empire, Tokugawa Japan, Tang China) and references a 2015 scientific paper on network theory and 'super spreaders.'
This document is page 176 of a manuscript or policy paper included in House Oversight records (likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, possibly a draft by Joshua Cooper Ramo or similar intellectual in Epstein's circle). The text discusses geopolitical philosophy, adapting the Westphalian concept of sovereignty to modern networks ('Cuius reticulum, eius reticulum'), and argues for an aggressive American defense strategy against existential threats like AI and genetic engineering. It cites a 2015 article in Nature regarding network theory and node centrality.
This page (175) appears to be from a strategic policy paper or manuscript discussing the concept of 'Hard Gatekeeping' in international relations and cyber security. It argues for a system where nations must adhere to certain standards (like IPv6 or nuclear non-proliferation) to benefit from inclusion in 'American gatekept systems.' It cites Brian Arthur's power-law dynamics and references historical precedents like the Thirty Years War to argue against forced inclusion while maintaining strategic exclusivity.
A page from a manuscript or philosophical essay discussing geopolitical strategy, specifically the concept of 'gatelands' and open vs. closed systems. The author argues that American influence should rely on the magnetic appeal of its superior economic and technical systems rather than force, referencing Gresham's Law and the history of global trade. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
This document is page 173 of a strategic policy paper or book (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018405) discussing the concept of 'Hard Gatekeeping.' The text argues for shifting national strategy from traditional military or diplomatic goals (like Middle East peace) toward 'topological mastery' of networks, including digital currency, genetic information platforms, and cyber/biological security. It cites Kenneth Waltz and Hal Brands to support arguments about anarchy, security, and grand strategy.
This document appears to be a page (p. 172) from a manuscript or book draft discussing geopolitical theory, specifically the concept of 'Gatekeeping' in the age of networks. It contrasts physical borders with topological controls over data and population flows, referencing historical figures like Lloyd George and Arnold Toynbee to draw parallels between colonial land acquisition and modern network power. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018404' stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence in a US House Oversight investigation.
This document is page 170 of a manuscript or book (likely 'The Seventh Sense' by Joshua Cooper Ramo, based on the content) stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses American foreign policy through the lens of 'network science' and 'topological destiny,' contrasting modern network threats with historical geopolitical models like the Cold War or Napoleonic era. It cites various academic sources and historical figures, including Thomas Paine and Andre Wolfers, to argue that the primary modern challenge is the destabilizing nature of global networks rather than traditional existential threats.
This document appears to be page 169 from a book (likely 'The Seventh Sense' by Joshua Cooper Ramo) discussing geopolitical strategy, historical cycles of war, and the research philosophy of Richard Hamming. While the text itself is philosophical and historical in nature, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018401' indicates it was produced as evidence during a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely linked to inquiries involving Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document appears to be a page (168) from a book or manuscript, possibly 'The Seventh Sense' by Joshua Cooper Ramo, included in House Oversight Committee evidence files. The text discusses Chinese geopolitical history, specifically Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms and philosophy ('white cat, black cat'), and transitions into a theoretical discussion on network connectivity, 'The Seventh Sense,' and global restructuring ('great destruction and great construction'). It does not explicitly mention Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
This document appears to be page 167 of a book manuscript (Chapter Ten: Defense in Depth), marked as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. The text recounts the author's meeting in Beijing with retired Chinese diplomat Huang Hua, discussing the philosophical differences between Western goal-oriented thinking and Chinese assessment of the 'nature of the age.' It contrasts the eras of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, specifically regarding their foreign policy and stance on the likelihood of war.
This text argues that in a highly interconnected, networked world, society needs sophisticated "gates" (monitoring and response systems) rather than "walls" (isolation) to manage crises like disease outbreaks or financial panics. Drawing parallels between the Ebola response and the 1929 financial crisis, the author warns that modern "Space Time Compression" makes the world vulnerable to rapid cascading failures without proper gatekeeping mechanisms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity