| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Schoen
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Federal Register document
|
Evidentiary exhibit |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Investigative subject provider |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
APO
|
Investigator subject of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Goldman Sachs
|
Document production |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Evidence submission |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document producer recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SinoVision
|
Subject of investigation citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subject of investigation discovery |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submitter investigative subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Document provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ackrell Capital
|
Investigative subject evidence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
|
Investigative subject evidence provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subject of inquiry document provider |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Call from House Oversight Committee to DOJ regarding Jeffrey Epstein indictment. | N/A | View |
This document page, stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', narrates the coordination between Edward Snowden and Laura Poitras during the early stages of the NSA leaks (circa 2013). It details Snowden's instructions for Poitras to recruit journalist Glenn Greenwald (for access to The Guardian) and Barton Gellman (for access to The Washington Post). The text describes the tradecraft and precautions Poitras utilized during a clandestine meeting with Gellman in Lower Manhattan to discuss the classified documents.
This document appears to be a narrative report (stamped House Oversight) detailing the initial contact between Edward Snowden and filmmaker Laura Poitras. It describes Snowden's employment at Dell in Hawaii in January 2013 and his admiration for Poitras's operational security, which she developed after being placed on a watchlist following her 2005 filming in Iraq. The text outlines how Snowden used Poitras's history of surveillance to establish a connection with her, referring to her as having been 'selected' by the NSA.
The document details the initial encrypted communication methods established between Edward Snowden (using aliases Anon108 and Citizen Four) and Laura Poitras in early 2013. It describes how Snowden utilized Micah Lee of the Freedom of the Press Foundation as an intermediary to obtain Poitras' PGP key. The text also critiques Snowden's initial claims to Poitras regarding his seniority and status within the intelligence community.
This page of a House Oversight report details the timeline of Edward Snowden's attempts to contact journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in late 2012 and early 2013 regarding NSA domestic surveillance. It describes Poitras' background, her anti-surveillance activism, and her connections to other figures like William Binney and Jacob Appelbaum. The text concludes with Snowden contacting Micah Lee in January 2013 as a secure route to reach Poitras in Berlin.
This document appears to be a page from a personal essay or blog post describing a past consensual BDSM encounter, focused on the importance of communication and safety (e.g., texting ID to a friend). It details the negotiation process, the encounter itself involving a collar and leather belt, and the boundaries set regarding sexual intercourse. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in evidence provided to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself contains no specific names or direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a printout of a blog post by Clarisse Thorn titled '[storytime] Sex Communication Case Studies' and related advice on sexual communication. It discusses workshops, writing love letters, and BDSM experiences, noting a URL dated July 2010. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
This document appears to be a page from an article, blog post, or essay stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses the mechanics of consensual '24/7' BDSM relationships, referencing specific educators 'Sir Top' and 'slave bonnie.' The author explores the use of journaling and letter writing as communication tools to navigate power dynamics and express desires that are difficult to verbalize.
This document appears to be a page of evidence from the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018473) containing a printout of a blog post by Clarisse Thorn dated June 14, 2010. The text discusses sexual communication tactics derived from BDSM practices, specifically the use of checklists to negotiate consent and desires, and introduces a section on 'Journal-Keeping' in the context of Master/slave relationships. The author references designing a workshop for the University of Illinois at Chicago.
This document is a page from a House Oversight Committee file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018472) containing a printout of online articles regarding sexual communication and BDSM practices. It discusses the use of 'S&M checklists' to negotiate consent and specific sexual acts, referencing blog posts from July 2010 by Clarisse Thorn and the 'Yes Means Yes' blog. The text focuses on theoretical discussions of consent mechanics rather than specific events or transactions.
This document appears to be a printout of a blog post or article regarding sexual ethics, consent, and relationship boundaries, stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018471'. The text discusses the concept that refusing sex is always a 'respectable choice' and includes a specific section by Thomas MacAulay Millar discussing BDSM dynamics (tops/bottoms) and spousal privacy. While part of a larger investigation file, the content itself is a general discussion on relationship dynamics rather than specific evidence of criminal activity.
This document appears to be a page from an article or transcript discussing sexual ethics, BDSM terminology, and consent, featuring commentary by Clarisse Thorn and Thomas MacAulay Millar. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence during a Congressional investigation, though the text itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or specific criminal acts.
This document, stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018469', appears to be a transcript of a blog post or article discussion featuring Thomas MacAulay Millar and Clarisse Thorn. The text focuses on BDSM safety practices, specifically the limitations of verbal 'safewords' and the necessity of nonverbal 'safesigns' (like hand squeezing) and active monitoring by the dominant partner. It includes a detailed quote from a commenter named 'Dw3t-Hthr' explaining the psychological inability to communicate verbally during altered states of consciousness.
This document appears to be a printout of a blog post or article discussing BDSM safety practices, specifically the 'stoplight' safeword system (Red, Yellow, Green). It features commentary from Thomas MacAulay Millar and a narrative from Clarisse Thorn regarding a sexual encounter with a man pseudonymously named 'Klark' while visiting America. The document is marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is evidence collected during a congressional investigation, likely related to materials found in the possession of subjects involved in the Epstein/Maxwell inquiry.
This document appears to be a page from a transcript or article featuring a dialogue between Clarisse Thorn and Thomas MacAulay Millar discussing BDSM psychology, specifically the concepts of 'safewords' and 'consensual nonconsent.' While the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018467' indicates this page is part of a larger government release (likely related to the Epstein investigation files), the text on this specific page discusses general BDSM theory and personal relationship dynamics without mentioning Jeffrey Epstein or specific crimes.
This document appears to be a page from a larger evidence file (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018466) containing a blog post titled 'The Annotated Safeword.' It features a dialogue/article format between Clarisse Thorn and Thomas MacAulay Millar discussing the mechanics and ethics of safewords within BDSM and sexual communication. While part of a document dump likely related to sex trafficking or oversight investigations, the text itself is a general educational discussion on consent and does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or specific crimes.
This document is a printout of a blog post dated November 11, 2010, from the website of Clarisse Thorn. The text discusses sexual communication, consent, and the application of S&M communication tactics to general sexuality. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018465' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in evidence for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018464, appears to be a page from a personal narrative, blog post, or essay regarding sex education and BDSM. The author reflects on their own misconceptions about BDSM, the utility of erotica, and the lack of education regarding sexual communication and boundary setting. The text describes the author creating a sex education workshop utilizing checklists inspired by the BDSM community to help partners communicate preferences.
This document contains a personal narrative reflecting on the nuances of sexual desire, consent, and self-discovery. The author critiques the idea of sex being purely mechanical or value-neutral, sharing anecdotes about early experiences where they felt pressured or confused by a lack of desire, and emphasizes the importance of understanding individual preferences.
This document appears to be a personal essay or blog post reflecting on sexual ethics, specifically critiquing the concept of "value-neutral" sex promoted during the sexual revolution. The author discusses resources like "The Joy of Sex" and "Our Bodies, Ourselves," expressing regret that the emotional weight of sex was not emphasized in their upbringing. The page ends with a block quote from a synopsis of the book "Modern Sex" regarding the failures of the sexual revolution. It bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
The author discusses their "sex-positive" upbringing and critiques the notion that sex must always be easy and light-hearted. They share their personal journey of discovering and accepting their interest in BDSM, contrasting their initial repression of "dark" desires with a friend's experience of integrating BDSM more easily due to a repressed background where all sex was viewed as taboo.
This document appears to be a printed blog post or article titled 'Liberal, Sex-Positive Sex Education: What's Missing,' originally written in 2009 and reposted in 2010 to support Scarleteen.com. The author reflects on their own sex-positive upbringing in the 1980s within the Unitarian Universalist tradition and shares correspondence with their mother regarding the challenges of parenting and sex education. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is likely an exhibit in a congressional investigation.
This document is a printout of a blog post titled 'Love Bites: An SM Coming Out Story' likely written by Clarisse Thorn, dated June 30, 2010. It details the author's personal reflections on feminism, BDSM, and her romantic relationships with two men named Andrew and Richard. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018459', indicating it was included as evidence or background material in a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or personal narrative (likely Virginia Giuffre's manuscript, based on the 'Andrew' and 'Richard' characters common in her accounts) included in House Oversight evidence. The text details the narrator's return from a six-month absence, her exploration of a BDSM identity through therapy found via 'Kink Aware Professionals,' and the transition of her friendship with a man named Andrew into a romantic relationship. It concludes with the narrator explaining to her father that she requires a specialist for 'S&M'.
This document appears to be a page from a personal narrative or memoir collected as evidence by the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped 018453). The text details a woman's emotionally turbulent and physically painful relationship with a man named Richard, who is described as a polyamorous BDSMer who inflicted bruises that left scars. The narrator describes a dynamic of infatuation, anger, and pain, noting that while the relationship did not revolve around sex, it was defined by pain and emotional conflict.
This document appears to be a page from a personal essay or narrative titled 'Love Bites: An S&M Coming-Out Story,' included in a House Oversight evidence file (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018450). The text recounts a relationship from the summer of 2005 when the narrator was 20 years old, focusing on a man named Richard and their sadomasochistic dynamic. It describes a specific drunken incident at a party where a friend intervened due to concern over Richard's physical treatment of the narrator, followed by a later conversation about their motivations for inflicting and receiving pain.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity