House Oversight Committee
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Schoen
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Federal Register document
|
Evidentiary exhibit |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Investigative subject provider |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
APO
|
Investigator subject of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Goldman Sachs
|
Document production |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Evidence submission |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document producer recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SinoVision
|
Subject of investigation citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subject of investigation discovery |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Submitter investigative subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Document provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Document provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ackrell Capital
|
Investigative subject evidence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
|
Investigative subject evidence provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subject of inquiry document provider |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Call from House Oversight Committee to DOJ regarding Jeffrey Epstein indictment. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018369.jpg
This document is page 137 of a manuscript or book, likely 'The Seventh Sense' (based on the specific terminology used in the text). It discusses the difference between physical geography and network topology, referencing a 1965 paper by Janelle and using Napoleon as an analogy for understanding new strategic dimensions. The page bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018369, indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018368.jpg
This document appears to be a page (136) from a book or academic text included in a House Oversight investigation production. It discusses the sociological and economic impacts of transportation speed, referencing concepts like 'Space-Time Compression' and 'Space-Time Convergence' by scholars Donald Janelle, Marx, and Paul Virilio. The text argues that the acceleration of travel (rail, air) diminishes the importance of geography and that mastering speed is a source of power and wealth.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018367.jpg
This document appears to be page 135 of a manuscript or book, marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of evidence produced for a congressional investigation (likely related to Jeffrey Epstein). The text is a philosophical and historical essay discussing the acceleration of technology, 'Hillis-style neural computers,' and the concept of modernity. It draws comparisons between the technological shifts in Russia (citing Tolstoy's 'Anna Karenina' and his death) and the expansion of the American frontier via the rail system. It does not contain direct communications or financial records related to Epstein's criminal activities on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016476.jpg
This document is the final signature page of a legal brief or correspondence dated December 28, 2018, signed by Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo. It references the procedural history of a SORA hearing and copies the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016475.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing (likely by a New York prosecutor) opposing a motion by 'the Post' to release appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The document argues that New York Civil Rights Law § 50-b prohibits the release of these documents to protect the privacy of sex crime victims. The author notes that the underlying crimes were prosecuted in Florida and that 'the Post' has not properly notified the victims or the Florida prosecutors as required by law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471.jpg
An email exchange from December 2018 between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, Director of Communications for the Manhattan DA. Edelman requests information regarding the Epstein case. Frost declines, stating the brief is filed under seal pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b to protect sex offense victims; Edelman challenges this, noting that typically only victim names are redacted, not the entire document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016470.jpg
An email exchange from December 5, 2018, between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Manhattan DA Communications Director Danny Frost. Frost asks if a requested 'cover page' is for publication or background information, noting that publication requires legal review. Edelman confirms the request is for her information only, not for publication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016469.jpg
An email chain from December 5, 2018, between reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, the Director of Communications for the Manhattan DA. Edelman questions Frost regarding an attached document, specifically asking if a judge ordered it sealed or if the sealing was merely stated by the DA's office, noting that the cover page is unclear. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016468.jpg
This document is an email exchange from December 5, 2018, between Susan Edelman (NY Post Reporter) and Danny Frost (Director of Communications for Manhattan DA Cy Vance, Jr.). Edelman inquires about a specific date and whether a court order exists to seal a document. Frost responds with the date 'August 2011.' The document contains the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016468.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016467.jpg
An email exchange from December 5, 2018, between NY Post reporter Susan Edelman and Manhattan DA Communications Director Danny Frost. Edelman questions whether the DA's office unilaterally sealed a document without a hearing. Frost responds that they are bound by Civil Rights Law § 50-b rather than a court order. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016466.jpg
An email exchange from December 5, 2018, between New York Post reporter Susan Edelman and Danny Frost, Director of Communications for the Manhattan DA. Edelman challenges the denial of a document request, arguing that victim names could simply be redacted. Frost responds that the document is filed under seal and he cannot violate it, but suggests 'off the record' that the Post should have their lawyers petition the court directly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016464.jpg
This document is a cover sheet labeled 'EXHIBIT D'. It bears the Bates stamp identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016464', indicating it serves as a divider or introductory page for a specific exhibit within a larger document production related to a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016463.jpg
The document is a news article detailing the scrutiny faced by Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance's office over its handling of Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender hearing, following revelations of a secret non-prosecution agreement in Florida. It highlights critical remarks from Judge Pickholz, the involvement of prosecutor Gaffney, and the role of then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta in sealing a federal indictment, ultimately questioning how Vance could have been unaware of the high-profile case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462.jpg
A 2018 New York Post article reporting on a January 2011 court hearing where the Manhattan DA's office, represented by Jennifer Gaffney, requested a downgrade of Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender status from Level 3 to Level 1. The request stunned Judge Ruth Pickholz, who noted she had never seen prosecutors make such a downward argument for such a troubling case. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee review.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016461.jpg
This document is a divider page labeled 'EXHIBIT C'. It features a Bates stamp number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016461' in the bottom right corner, indicating it is part of a larger document production by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016460.jpg
This document appears to be a media article preserved in House Oversight records describing a New York court hearing where Judge Ruth Pickholz expressed shock that the DA's office argued for leniency regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender status. Despite the DA's arguments, Epstein was assigned Level 3 status (the highest risk level), a decision upheld by the NY Court of Appeals citing evidence of multiple victims. The article also references Virginia Roberts' allegations against Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016459.jpg
This document is a news article from January 2015 reporting that the Manhattan District Attorney's office, specifically ADA Jennifer Gaffney, argued in a 2011 hearing that Jeffrey Epstein should receive a lower (Level 1) sex-offender status. The article highlights that this leniency would spare him from registering every 90 days in New York and mentions allegations involving Prince Andrew. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016458.jpg
This document is a separator or cover page labeled 'EXHIBIT B'. It contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016458' in the bottom right corner, indicating it is part of a document production related to a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016456.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an investigative report (likely the Miami Herald) detailing the aftermath of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the unusual coordination between federal prosecutors and Epstein's defense team regarding victim notification, contrasts Ken Starr's defense of Epstein with his prosecution of Clinton, and features quotes from Detective Recarey expressing regret that Epstein avoided prison and that victims were labeled prostitutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016455.jpg
This document serves as a narrative summary of the tense negotiations between the US Attorney's Office (Acosta, Sloman) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz, Starr) around 2008. It details how Epstein's lawyers aggressively pressured the government to prevent victim notification, leading to a secret non-prosecution agreement while the FBI briefly continued investigating in NY and NM. The text notes that in 2013, the government finally admitted they backed down on victim notifications due to objections from Epstein's attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016454.jpg
This document page, likely from a House Oversight Committee report, features a photograph of a woman (presumably Villafaña) and a text excerpt describing her frustration during legal negotiations. It quotes a communication from Villafaña to Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz, dated December 13, 2007, in which she claims to have 'bent over backwards' to accommodate the effects of an agreement on Mr. Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016453.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news report (likely the Miami Herald given the authors) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details a December 2007 letter from Alexander Acosta to Kenneth Starr, in which Acosta complains that Epstein is in violation of a September plea agreement and criticizes the defense team's stalling tactics. The page features a collage of photos including Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz, and others, though only the text is analyzed here.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016451.jpg
This document, likely from a House Oversight investigation, details the 2011 fallout where victim Roberts publicly accused Epstein, Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. It describes Alexander Acosta's defense of his decision not to prosecute Epstein federally, citing a 'year-long assault' by Epstein's legal team. However, the report notes that documents show prosecutors capitulated to the defense team's demands, abandoning a prepared 53-page indictment from 2007.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity