Trove
Sign In Sign Up

defense

Person
Mentions
14
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
7
Also known as:
Defense Council Defense Counsel (Thomas) Court and Defense Counsel Defense Counsel (Laura) Counsel for Government and Defense Defense Counsel (Cassidy, Guha, Necheles) Defense Counsel (Jay)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2020-10-19 N/A Government sends 'preliminary statement of facts' to defense counsel to discuss potential resolut... Email correspondence View

EFTA00027491.pdf

This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) regarding the forensic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence reveals significant friction caused by technical incompatibility between the FBI's forensic tools and the USANYS's 'Relativity' review platform, exacerbated by delays due to COVID-19 and FBI network infrastructure updates. The document lists specific seized hardware (Dell servers, Sony laptops, various hard drives with NYC serial numbers) and concludes with USANYS seeking funding to hire a private vendor (BRG) to expedite the processing because they have lost confidence in the FBI's ability to deliver in a timely manner. While flight records are mentioned as a type of document contained within the evidence (specifically regarding the inability to link attachments to emails), no actual flight logs are present in this document.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00018888.pdf

This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, concerning the transmission of legal discovery material ('3500 material') in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender confirms that files have been uploaded to USAfx for the defense team and that a physical drive will be prepared and sent via FedEx. The email includes several attachments referencing indices, non-testifying witness material, and cover letters.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021991.jpg

This is the final page (page 15) of a court transcript filed on December 19, 2019, for Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. The judge rules to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act until April 20, 2020, to allow for discovery production and motion preparation. The hearing is adjourned, and the defendants' bail status remains unchanged.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A government prosecutor addresses the Court regarding the potential calling of a rebuttal expert and the logistics of closing arguments, specifically how to present sealed exhibits to the jury without making them public. The speaker emphasizes coordination with the defense to ensure the process runs smoothly.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005248.jpg

This document is page 3 of a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 15, 2021. The Government argues that the defense's proposed deadline of November 15, 2021, for filing Rule 412 motions (regarding the admissibility of victims' sexual behavior) is impractical as it conflicts with jury selection and the Thanksgiving holiday. The Government requests an earlier deadline to allow sufficient time for investigation and *in camera* hearings.

Legal filing / government motion (case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005215.jpg

This legal document, filed on October 13, 2021, argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered voir dire (jury questioning) for a high-publicity case involving a well-known defendant. The filing contends that the sensitive and inflammatory nature of the charges, specifically sexual abuse of minors, makes it unlikely for jurors to be candid in a group setting, thus hindering the ability of both the defense and prosecution to identify biases and ensure a fair trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$40,332,000,000.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$40,332,000,000.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
1789-01-01 Received PRC / US Government defense $40,332,000,000.00 Defense Spending ($40,332 MM) View
As Sender
73
As Recipient
33
Total
106

Reciprocal discovery under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)

From: Government officials
To: defense

Request for inspection and copying of evidence intended for trial.

Request
2020-08-05
Communication Source

Reciprocal Discovery

From: Government officials
To: defense

Request for reciprocal discovery under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b) and disclosure of prior statements.

Legal request (referenced)
2020-08-05
Communication Source

Protective Order Ruling

From: Judge Alison J. Nathan
To: defense

Court ruling adopting the Government's proposed protective order regarding discovery materials.

Memorandum opinion & order
2020-07-30
Communication Source

Bail hearing arguments

From: defense
To: ["Court"]

The defense made written and oral submissions to the Court urging the release of the defendant on bail.

Legal submissions
2020-07-14
Communication Source

Bail Application

From: defense
To: Court

Arguments for release on bail, offers of private security, and explanations for hiding (media frenzy).

Court hearing (oral/written submissions)
2020-07-14
Communication Source

Waiver of physical presence

From: defense
To: THE COURT

Signed waiver of physical presence form received by the court.

Form submission
2020-07-10
Communication Source

Discovery Request

From: defense
To: Government officials

Request for information on other officers and charging decisions.

Letter
2020-03-27
Communication Source

Forensic Reports

From: Government officials
To: defense

Forensic reports for electronic devices and a photograph of a text message.

Discovery production
2020-03-16
Communication Source

Witness Statements / Discovery

From: Government officials
To: defense

Provision of witness statements and 3500 material four months in advance of trial.

Discovery production
2020-02-10
Communication Source

Adjournment Request

From: defense
To: Court

A letter referenced by the court in which the defense requested an adjournment of the trial.

Letter
2020-01-30
Communication Source

Discovery Request

From: defense
To: Government officials

Request for OIG reports and internal BOP records.

Letter
2020-01-29
Communication Source

An unspecified incident

From: defense
To: JANE

After referring to the December 2019 interview, the defense asked questions about a February 2020 interview.

Interview
2020-01-01
Communication Source

JE defense supplemental letter requesting preservation an...

From: defense
To: prosecution

Referenced in attachment filename.

Letter
2019-08-01
Communication Source

JE defense letter requesting preservation and production

From: defense
To: prosecution

Referenced in attachment filename.

Letter
2019-07-26
Communication Source

Discovery and Case Management

From: defense
To: prosecutors

Weingarten mentions having 'good conversations' with the prosecutors.

Meeting
2019-07-16
Communication Source

An unspecified incident

From: defense
To: JANE

The defense referred Jane to a document from a December 2019 interview.

Interview
2019-01-01
Communication Source

Discovery

From: defense
To: plaintiff

Requests for names of medical providers, employers, and education history.

Interrogatories
2016-04-21
Communication Source

Unknown

From: defense
To: A. Marie Villafaña

Jay - I hate to have to be firm about this, but we need to wrap this up by Monday. I will not miss my indictment date... I have had an 82-page pros memo and 53-page indictment sitting on the shelf since May...

Email
2010-06-30
Communication Source

Psychiatric Evaluation

From: Ryan
To: defense

A report drafted by Dr. Hall, allegedly containing largely hearsay regarding Minor Victim-4.

Report
2009-01-01
Communication Source

Response regarding witness Alexander Hamilton

From: defense
To: THE COURT

Defense response regarding the witness received at 12:31 a.m.

Legal filing/response
2008-10-22
Communication Source

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File CIVIL RICO...

From: Spencer Kuvin
To: defense

Filing of motion and service to counsel via CM/ECF or mail.

Electronic filing
2008-08-13
Communication Source

Response regarding NPA

From: Criminal Division/DOJ
To: defense

Six- or seven-page letter endorsing the exercise of prosecutorial discretion and noting unusual facts surrounding the NPA.

Letter
2008-05-01
Communication Source

Submissions regarding jurisdiction

From: defense
To: DOJ Criminal Division

Submissions arguing the case was a local crime without interstate elements.

Letter
2008-03-01
Communication Source

NPA modification

From: Acosta
To: defense

Acosta's letter proposing NPA modification was ultimately rejected by the defense team.

Letter
2007-12-19
Communication Source

Rejection of federal plea and shift to state-only resolution

From: defense
To: prosecution

Defense rejected the federal plea option and resumed negotiations for an NPA for Epstein to plead to only state charges.

Negotiation
2007-09-20
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search