DAMIAN WILLIAMS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
24
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional hierarchical |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW A. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Superior subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew A. Rohrbach
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
J. A. H. Hodge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 79 (Certificate of Compliance). | Court | View |
| 2023-04-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Certificate of Compliance for a motion in Case 22-1426, certifying that the motion co... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office filed an Application for Immunity Order to compel a witness t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | Legal authorization | Approval was granted for the U.S. Attorney's office to seek a court order to compel testimony fro... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 598 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, stating no redactions are sought for juror ques... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | N/A | Submission of Government's conclusion regarding defendant's motion for a new trial | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office submitted a document requesting the Court to deny a defendant... | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-01-10 | Court filing | A document was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE stating the defense's agreement with the governmen... | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00010736.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 26, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves as a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In it, the government submits a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was attached to her victim impact statement, in response to a court order issued that same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010732.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal document filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The document argues against adjourning a defendant's sentencing, stating that her continued access to legal documents and counsel means the sentencing should proceed as scheduled on June 28, 2022. The document is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00010728.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 26, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, is a submission from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The government states it does not oppose an application for an unspecified party to speak at sentencing but notes that the request appears to be governed by a previous court order from June 24, 2022. The document is submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by four Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00010590.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 55) of a court filing submitted by the United States Attorney's Office on June 22, 2022, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government explicitly requests a prison sentence between 360 and 660 months (30 to 55 years) citing the magnitude of her crimes involving the sexual exploitation of young girls.
DOJ-OGR-00010417.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing submitted on May 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It is submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach from the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00010415.jpg
This is the signature page (page 2) of a legal document filed on May 11, 2022, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal trial). It lists Damian Williams as the United States Attorney, with specific signatures from Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach representing the Southern District of New York. The document indicates a copy was sent to the Defense Counsel via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00010365.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal document filed on April 25, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document, submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and his assistants for the Southern District of New York, states that the Probation Office has no objection to advancing a deadline to June 14, 2022, provided that the parties submit comments on the draft Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) by June 1, 2022. Defense Counsel was copied on the filing.
DOJ-OGR-00010323.jpg
This is the second page of a legal filing (Document 652) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 1, 2022. The document is an opposition by the US Government to a motion for a stay, arguing it is based only on the defendant's conjecture. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00010320.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal document filed on April 1, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. The filing, submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and his assistants, states that the Government has conferred with defense counsel, and that defense counsel consents to an unspecified request. A copy was sent to the defense counsel via the court's electronic filing system.
DOJ-OGR-00010306.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 16 of 16) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 15, 2022. The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should be denied based on reasons in the Government's memorandum. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00010291.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on March 15, 2022, it is the government's memorandum opposing the defendant's motion for a new trial. The prosecution team is headed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg
This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.
DOJ-OGR-00009847.jpg
This is the signature page (Conclusion) of a legal document filed by the United States Attorney's Office in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record and instead schedule a hearing to resolve the motion. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00009799.jpg
This document is the cover page for the United States Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial. It was filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York under case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists United States Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach as counsel for the government.
DOJ-OGR-00009774.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, for case 20-cr-00330-ABN. The juror responds to a series of questions about their personal relationships with key case participants. The juror explicitly denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00009676.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. The juror responds to a series of questions, denying any personal knowledge of or past/present dealings with the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The juror consistently answers "No" to all questions regarding personal relationships with case participants.
DOJ-OGR-00009675.jpg
This document is page 14 of a filed court document (Document 638) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 9, 2022. It contains a portion of a questionnaire filled out by Juror ID 50. The juror answers 'No' to having any association with the NYPD and 'No' to having any opinion of U.S. Attorneys Damian Williams or Audrey Strauss that would affect their impartiality.
DOJ-OGR-00009660.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on March 9, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is based on an application by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted individual to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022. The document states that this individual had refused to testify, citing the privilege against self-incrimination, but the U.S. Attorney judged their testimony to be in the public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00009637.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 635) dated March 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains proposed questions for a juror regarding potential bias against Maxwell and their ability to be fair. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00009632.jpg
This document is a court order filed on March 7, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details an application by US Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted male witness to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022, despite the witness refusing to do so based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The document cites Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003 regarding immunity and compulsion of testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009630.jpg
This is a legal declaration filed on March 7, 2022, by Assistant US Attorney Lara Pomerantz in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document supports an application to grant immunity to a redacted male witness who has refused to testify based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The prosecution seeks to compel this witness's testimony for a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00009628.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 7, 2022, from the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Assistant Attorney General to Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The letter grants authorization to seek a court order to compel a witness, whose name is redacted, to testify in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. This order would provide the witness with immunity, overcoming any refusal to testify based on the privilege against self-incrimination.
DOJ-OGR-00009627.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the Southern District of New York, signed by US Attorney Damian Williams on March 7, 2022. It requests the Court to issue an order compelling a redacted individual to testify at a March 8, 2022 hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The request is made pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003, which typically relate to granting immunity to witnesses to compel testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009626.jpg
This legal document is an application filed on March 7, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The application requests a court order to grant immunity to and compel the testimony of a witness, whose name is redacted, for a hearing scheduled on March 8, 2022. The witness had previously refused to testify, invoking their privilege against self-incrimination.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity