Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Counsel

Person
Mentions
172
Relationships
34
Events
237
Documents
81
Also known as:
Plaintiffs' Counsel Plaintiffs' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) Special Counsel Jeffrey Epstein's Counsel Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein All Counsel Counsel General (South African) Counsel General Nine victims who had previously retained counsel legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) Government and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) legal counsel Counsel (Comey and Sternheim)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
34 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jury
Professional
5
1
View
person Loftus
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The Defendant
Client
5
1
View
person Recipient of Information
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The President
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Legal representative
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
1
1
View
person The Court (Judge)
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Legal visits characterized by uncomfortable conditions, lack of privacy, and surveillance MDC Legal Visiting Rooms View
N/A N/A Meeting between Court and Counsel at 8:45 AM. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Trial sessions planned for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday before Christmas and New Year's. Courtroom View
N/A N/A 10-minute break (Recess) Courtroom View
N/A N/A 9 a.m. conference regarding the jury charge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Charging Conference (Trial Tr. at 2758–61) Court View
N/A N/A Jury Charge / Instructions phase of the trial. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Scheduled oral argument in both cases. Court View
N/A N/A Side bar conferences Courtroom View
N/A N/A Government Exhibit 10 is admitted into evidence. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President. Washington D.C. (Implied) View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation Scheduling Discussion Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation/Recess Courtroom View
N/A Legal proceeding The Hearing N/A View
N/A N/A Protracted discussion regarding a jury note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential Evidentiary Hearing Court View
N/A N/A Guards setting up a tripod/camera focused on Maxwell during legal conferences. MDC View
N/A N/A Closing arguments in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Counsel Meeting Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal conferences where Maxwell is separated by a cloudy plastic shield, cannot handle documents,... MDC Visiting Room View
N/A Trial A trial in which the jury is being instructed on how to evaluate witness testimony. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court and the Defendant's counsel discussed a note received from the deliberating jury. Court View
N/A Meeting A daily meeting scheduled for 8:30 a.m. beginning 'tomorrow' to prepare for voir dire. courtroom, 518 View
N/A Court proceeding The court is in session to discuss a note from the jury regarding their deliberation schedule aro... Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011668.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017415.jpg

This document page, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, appears to be a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing legal work during the Apartheid era. It begins with a quote from 'Woody' (likely Allen) about blacklisting, then recounts the narrator's denied visa to South Africa, collaboration with Irwin Cotler, and secret negotiations with an East German lawyer to exchange client Anatoly Sharansky and potentially Nelson Mandela. It notes Mandela's refusal to be part of a spy swap.

Manuscript draft / legal exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149.jpg

This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein against federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The text argues that the prosecution lacks evidence of 'inducement' or 'enticement' occurring over the phone or internet, noting that communications were often handled by secretaries and did not contain explicit content. The defense claims the women involved ('masseuses') were 'friends of friends' who visited Epstein's home voluntarily, often without direct prior contact with Epstein himself.

Legal memorandum / defense filing
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030263.jpg

The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Investigative narrative / document produced to house oversight committee
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg

This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.

Legal transcript
2025-11-17
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Plaintiffs Counsel $0.00 Obligation to pay counsel a reasonable fee for ... View
0001-07-01 Received Attorney General ... Counsel $0.00 Hypothetical refusal of the Special Counsel's b... View
As Sender
33
As Recipient
75
Total
108

Privilege Waiver

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Discussion on whether privilege was waived and confirming it belongs to the client.

Court transcript
2021-12-01
Communication Source

Testimony

From: JANE
To: Counsel

Jane testified she did not know cooperation would benefit civil litigation.

Court transcript
2021-12-01
Communication Source

Court Transcript

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Cited as '12/01/21 Tr. at 567'.

Transcript
2021-12-01
Communication Source

Re: U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Nathan NYSD Chambers
To: Counsel

Asking to confirm as soon as possible that a copy of the response was served on counsel for the moving parties.

Email
2021-11-22
Communication Source

Re: U.S. v. Maxwell...

From: Nathan NYSD Chambers
To: Counsel

Requesting confirmation that a copy of the response was served on counsel for the moving parties.

Email
2021-11-22
Communication Source

Juror Lists

From: Counsel
To: Court

Deadline for lists for questionnaires completed on Nov 12.

Email
2021-11-13
Communication Source

Juror Lists

From: Counsel
To: Court

Deadline for lists for questionnaires completed on Nov 4 and 5.

Email
2021-11-07
Communication Source

Draft preliminary remarks for prospective jurors (Dkt. 366)

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Order inviting response to proposed address to prospective jury.

Court order
2021-10-22
Communication Source

Conference

From: Court
To: Counsel

Reference to 'yesterday's conference' where reasons for the order were stated on the record.

Meeting
2021-10-21
Communication Source

Exhibit List

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Counsel hand-delivered and deposited exhibit list in the MDC legal mailbox.

Delivery
2021-10-17
Communication Source

Re: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Joint Proposed Juro...

From: Nathan NYSD Chambers
To: Counsel

The Court requests that counsel provide Word doc versions of the proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire.

Email
2021-10-14
Communication Source

Failure to provide hard drive to Ms. Maxwell

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC Legal"]

On the morning of the filing (October 14), counsel emailed MDC Legal again regarding the failure to provide Ms. Maxwell with the hard drive.

Email
2021-10-14
Communication Source

Failure to provide hard drive to Ms. Maxwell

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC Legal"]

On the morning of the filing (October 14), counsel emailed MDC Legal again regarding the failure to provide Ms. Maxwell with the hard drive.

Email
2021-10-14
Communication Source

N/A (Quoted text)

From: Chambers of the Hon. A...
To: Counsel

Request for logistics planning, attendee numbers, and phone numbers for Oct 21 teleconference and Nov 1 pretrial conference.

Email
2021-10-13
Communication Source

Non-receipt of hard drive by Ms. Maxwell

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC Legal"]

On October 13, counsel emailed MDC Legal because Ms. Maxwell had not yet received the hard drive of evidence.

Email
2021-10-13
Communication Source

Non-receipt of hard drive by Ms. Maxwell

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC Legal"]

On October 13, counsel emailed MDC Legal because Ms. Maxwell had not yet received the hard drive of evidence.

Email
2021-10-13
Communication Source

Re: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Joint Proposed Juro...

From: Nathan NYSD Chambers
To: Counsel

Clarifying rules on sealing documents on ECF and requesting a copy of Jencks Act materials.

Email
2021-10-12
Communication Source

Return of legal mail

From: Unit Manager
To: Counsel

Unit Manager contacted counsel regarding irregularity and personally returned legal mail.

Meeting/interaction
2021-10-09
Communication Source

US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery letter

From: Unknown (USANYS)
To: Counsel

Please see the attached letter.

Email
2021-09-14
Communication Source

U. S. v. Thomas, No. 19 Cr 830 - Discovery Production 7

From: Paralegal Specialist (...
To: Counsel

Notification regarding Government's discovery production (Production 7), including a zip file uploaded to USAfx and an 'attorney's eyes only' document.

Email
2021-04-14
Communication Source

Defendant's discovery access

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

A letter mentioned in the main document where MDC legal counsel asks the Court to vacate its January 15, 2021 order that permitted the defendant to use a laptop on weekends and holidays.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Request to vacate Jan 15, 2021 order

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

A letter from MDC legal counsel asking the Court to vacate its January 15, 2021 order that directed the MDC to permit the defendant to use a laptop on weekends and holidays.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Re: In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena_19-mc-00179

From: Courtroom Deputy to Ho...
To: Counsel

Notification of an attached Order filed under seal in 19-mc-179.

Email
2021-01-21
Communication Source

Restrictive conditions of confinement

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC warden"]

A letter detailing the most serious and extraordinarily restrictive conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement.

Letter
2020-10-29
Communication Source

Request for an expert opinion on UK-US extradition arrang...

From: Peters
To: Counsel

A set of five questions instructing a legal counsel to prepare an expert opinion on the extradition process between the UK and the US, specifically focusing on bail, consent, bars to extradition, and human rights arguments as they might apply to Ms Maxwell.

Legal instructions
2020-08-12
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search