Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Submission of document (Case 1:20-cv-00330-AJN)

From: Laura A. Menninger
To: Court

Respectfully submitted signature page.

Legal filing
2020-09-04

Opposition to requested stay

From: Robert Glassman, Esq. ...
To: Court

A letter from the Plaintiff vigorously opposing the requested stay, arguing Maxwell was trying to gain an unfair advantage.

Letter
2020-08-27

Consent to entry of a stay

From: Bennet J. Moskowitz, E...
To: Court

A letter from the Co-Executors consenting to a stay and requesting it apply to the entire proceeding, arguing a partial stay would be prejudicial.

Letter
2020-08-27

Plaintiff Opposition

From: Glassman
To: Court

Does not contest substantial overlap between cases.

Letter
2020-08-27

Discovery renewal instructions

From: Court
To: Parties

Referenced as Dkt. 49.

Order
2020-08-25

Reply letter regarding disclosure of information

From: defendant
To: Court

A reply letter from the Defendant stating she is seeking to disclose factual information under seal to certain judicial officers regarding a grand jury investigation.

Letter
2020-08-24

Reply letter

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Defendant's reply letter.

Letter
2020-08-24

Addressing proposed redactions

From: Government officials
To: Court

Letter addressing proposed redactions to the Aug 17 motion.

Letter
2020-08-24

Reply regarding protective order modification

From: Ghislaine Maxwell (Def...
To: Court

Defendant's reply letter addressing proposed redactions and arguments.

Reply letter
2020-08-24

Reply to Government's response

From: Ghislaine Maxwell (Def...
To: Court

Addressed proposed redactions and arguments.

Reply letter
2020-08-24

In support of her motion

From: MAXWELL
To: Court

Maxwell filed a reply to support her motion.

Legal filing (reply)
2020-08-24

Reply letter

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Defendant's reply letter.

Letter
2020-08-24

Addressing proposed redactions

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Letter addressing proposed redactions to the August 17 motion.

Letter
2020-08-24

Proposed redactions

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government proposed redactions to Maxwell's Aug 17 letter.

Proposal
2020-08-21

Response to Defendant's motion

From: Government officials
To: Court

Proposed redactions to Defendant's motion.

Response letter
2020-08-21

Proposed redactions

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government proposed redactions to Defendant's August 17 letter.

Letter
2020-08-21

Proposed redactions

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government proposed redactions to Maxwell's Aug 17 letter.

Proposal
2020-08-21

Motion to Stay

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Requesting stay of civil case until conclusion of criminal case.

Motion/letter
2020-08-19

Motion for a stay

From: Menninger (on behalf o...
To: Court

A letter motion filed by Maxwell requesting a stay of the civil action until the conclusion of her pending criminal case.

Letter
2020-08-19

Arguments for stay

From: Menninger
To: Court

Summarizing allegations and noting similarities between Indictment and Complaint.

Letter
2020-08-19

Defense arguments

From: Menninger
To: Court

Letter referenced regarding defense preparation difficulties.

Letter
2020-08-19

Defense Letter

From: Defendant
To: Court

Requesting order permitting defendant to file under seal in certain civil cases discovery materials produced by the Government.

Letter
2020-08-17

Motion seeking order modifying protective order

From: Ghislaine Maxwell (Def...
To: Court

Requested permission to file discovery materials under seal in certain civil cases.

Letter motion
2020-08-17

Motion seeking modification of protective order

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Sealed letter motion seeking to modify protective order to allow filing discovery materials in civil cases under seal.

Letter motion
2020-08-17

Defense Letter

From: Defendant
To: Court

Requesting order permitting defendant to file under seal in certain civil cases discovery materials produced by Government.

Letter
2020-08-17

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity