Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Protective Order regarding Discovery

From: Court
To: Defense Counsel, Defen...

Rules regarding the possession, inspection, and copying of confidential discovery materials.

Legal order
2019-07-25
Communication Source

ECF No. 24

From: Jeffrey Epstein (Defense)
To: Court

Defense letter asserting the Austrian passport expired 32 years ago and was never used.

Letter
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Defense claims regarding Austrian passport expiration and...

From: defendant
To: Court

Claimed the passport expired 32 years ago and was never used.

Letter (ecf no. 24)
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Bail submission supplement (Dkt.24)

From: Jeffrey Epstein (Counsel)
To: Court

Referenced letter supplementing bail submission.

Letter
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Epstein Witness Tampering

From: federal prosecutors
To: Court

Allegation that Epstein paid $350,000 to influence potential witnesses.

Letter
2019-07-12
Communication Source

Attorney Update

From: Court
To: Parties

Attorney Alex Rossmiller, Maurene Ryan Comey, Alison Gainfort Moe for USA added.

Notice
2019-07-08
Communication Source

Opinion and Order

From: Court
To: Parties

Court issued an opinion and order [Doc. 435] regarding the case.

Court order
2019-02-21
Communication Source

Motion to unseal documents

From: Miami Herald
To: Court

Argued that with the case closed, all documents should be made public.

Legal motion
2018-04-01
Communication Source

Sealed Opinion

From: Court
To: Parties

A sealed opinion resolving the motion to quash the subpoena.

Legal opinion
2017-04-04
Communication Source

Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order

From: Parties (Plaintiff and...
To: Court

Joint submission of case management plan

Filing
2016-12-09
Communication Source

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED

From: Court
To: DONALD J. TRUMP

Summons issued as to Donald J. Trump.

Summons
2016-06-21
Communication Source

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED

From: Court
To: JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN

Summons issued as to Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Summons
2016-06-21
Communication Source

Testimony regarding non-prosecution

From: Bruce Castor
To: Court

Testified regarding intent to preclude prosecution to strip Cosby of Fifth Amendment rights.

Testimony
2016-02-02
Communication Source

Non-prosecution logic

From: Bruce Castor
To: Court

Reasoning regarding prosecution of other cases if evidence existed, provided Constand deposition wasn't used.

Testimony/statement
2016-02-02
Communication Source

Response in case

From: Laura Menninger
To: Court

Claimed Roberts fabricated stories for money.

Legal filing
2016-01-01
Communication Source

Response in Maxwell case

From: Laura Menninger
To: Court

Claimed Roberts fabricated abuse stories for money.

Legal response
2016-01-01
Communication Source

Motion to Seal

From: Boies, Schiller & Flex...
To: Court

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 at 10:08:04 a.m.

Filing
2015-12-11
Communication Source

Motion to Intervene / Affidavit

From: ALAN DERSHOWITZ
To: Court

Claimed he had not sexually abused Jane Doe No. 3 and that minimal investigation would prove it.

Legal filing
2015-01-05
Communication Source

Motion to join the case

From: Ms. Giuffre and Jane D...
To: Court

Seeking to join the case and asserting rights as victims under CVRA.

Legal filing
2014-12-30
Communication Source

CVRA pleading

From: Virginia Giuffre/Attor...
To: Court

Allegations of sexual contact against Dershowitz first appeared.

Legal pleading
2014-12-01
Communication Source

Order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188)

From: Court
To: Parties

Referenced as the order defining the subject matter of the Confidential Discovery Material.

Court order
2013-06-18
Communication Source

Criminal Complaint

From: federal prosecutors
To: Court

Three-count criminal complaint charging Snowden with theft and Espionage Act violations.

Legal filing
2013-06-01
Communication Source

Character Reference

From: Phil Allen
To: Court

Details David's extensive volunteer work in youth sports.

Letter
2013-03-07
Communication Source

Negotiations

From: Assistant U.S. Attorne...
To: Court

Admitting prosecutors backed down under pressure and reevaluated victim notification obligations.

Court filing
2013-01-01
Communication Source

Hearing

From: Court
To: Court

Transcript of Hearing

Transcript
2012-02-15
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search